Philosophy Now Forum

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 16, 2019 8:24 pm

So much for math containing all of the answers...

Are you an admirer of the great surrealist painter Salvador Dali? He is famous for having written the screenplay of the Hollywood blockbuster Hello Dali.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Dal%C3%AD

Its just a matter of perspective. From experience of this 3rd party intelligence (22yrs worth) I cannot to this day truly discern between whether God is 'divine' or whether it is indeed some form of technology, indeed an A.I. (note my previous post above) I don't think our one-post-wonder friend is...

I will answer to your polite and constructive questions. I have a question. Suppose I'm walking down the street and a guy standing on a soapbox tells me that I'm nothing but a thought in the mind of God. God made the world and made me. God is everywhere, knows everything, can do anything. God makes...

Here is Henri, the existentialist cat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q34z5dCmC4M

How did this become the insane crank forum?

Does it have phalluses?

Isn't that just logical AND?

So that if it's raining AND it's Tuesday you'd say that rain implies Tuesday?

This is because mathematics is a sub set of logic and so therefore needs logic in order to justify all of its axioms I haven't followed this thread but this sentence caught my eye. Didn't Gödel definitively prove that math isn't a subset of logic? Math transcends logic. Gödel's work destroyed the h...

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 26, 2019 3:22 am

..this argument is about losing sanity...not gaining it.

Don't you first have to have some sanity to lose?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑

Wed Aug 21, 2019 6:58 pm

10. P Vs. NP is its own solution to its own problem as a process of definition.

If P = NP you just divide by P to get 1 = N. QED.

PeteOlcott wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 23, 2019 10:16 pm

Conceptual truth is a set of stipulated relations between meanings mutually defining
each other semantically comprising the body of conceptual knowledge.

20 years on that meaningless word salad. It's funny or sad, pathetic or horrifying.

Yes, I am aware of it. It's part of model theory. I am arguing ultrafinitism. As usual. Was not aware that's your usual viewpoint. I'm a big fan of the work of the late Ed Nelson, the most prominent serious ultrafinitist. But arguing against the use of the infinity symbol in the extended real numbe...

What does that mean? You a Cantor denier? I mean that whereof one cannot speak, one must remain silent. We can't speak of one infinity being greater than another infinity without committing conceptual and symbolic equivocation. ∞ + 1 = ∞ (True) ∞ + 1 - ∞ = ∞ - ∞ (Undefined) ∞ + 2 = ∞ (True) ∞ + 1 >...

Skepdick wrote: ↑

Sun Aug 18, 2019 9:10 pm

Infinity is the principle of explosion in disguise.

What does that mean? You a Cantor denier?

PeteOlcott wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 17, 2019 6:41 am

It is a correct refutation of [you are a clueless wonder that does not know jack shit].

Pete's losing it.