Philosophy Now Forum

Your maths is right, interpretation in politics well... If you're a congressperson voting on a tax bill, you have to look past the percentage to get a truer picture of the financials. So do you think we can come up with a better math language that is more expressive? Do you think we can find an hone...

. Hi, I'm Blaggard ...the things people say that are complete bullshit. ............................................................... http://i.imgur.com/95jtz.gif . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIP6EwqMEoE http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/8100000/Inigo-Montoya-the-princess-bride-inigo-m...

I think, however, you don't which is both a reply to the above and a rather witty way of saying two things at once, of course you seem to say nothing at all and not even in a sentence or at once or likewise cleverly or more interestingly in any form. Please feel free to put that in a different font ...

The OP has no sense at all, maths at all, or logic. Why you picked up on complex maths is perhaps most apposite though. I think I wonder and no offense mate if you really understand maths? Quantum mechanics, or quantum well that is the least of your problems with the OP. Are you talking to me? The O...

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Shouldn't this be on some religious nut-job site?

Probably but philosophy forums are the new religious nut job site, so, it's possibly in the right place. Although I will have to trust the irony is not wasted on you.

You don't correspond full stop, the fact that you don't correspond off board is the least of your problems I think. I realise though you are playing a game of snakes and ladders, with yourself. Do hf with that, let me know how it all turns out, not off board of course, bored or board the argument yo...

Is that stupid tax, because we already have the lottery so we don't need it?


Tea party, they should try actually drinking tea, might actually help, and the irony of that is not lost on anyone is it? Perhaps they could eat cake too?

Jackles, the closer you get to c the more local you will not be. That is true, but then moving away from people at speeds approaching c and getting further away is hardly more than a tautology. Do though explain what you mean, for once perhaps in your stupid Jesus life. Because I am out of ideas as ...

Well thank you for that Bill (I think) but I don't really think it attempts to answer the question.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:




..I think I found a place where you can put this.

.

I know a place you can put that post perhaps? Let's trade emails. Couldn't hurt, well I say that but meh you get the gist...

Someone today asked me a really interesting question which I think basically involves almost every area of philosophy, well at least that my limited mind knows. So I will just ask the question and see where it leads... "What would restore my faith in people?" I know what a straight out of ...

Welcome, if it's any consolation I am also too sexy for myself, and so sexy it hurts.

You sound like a mad nerd, I think you will fit in perfectly here. Cthulhu willing.

Well yeah what's wrong with nit picking anyway? Philosophy is that surely or it is nothing...

I think I wonder and no offense mate if you really understand maths?

Quantum mechanics, or quantum well that is the least of your problems with the OP.

no a hole inside hole just means stop digging. In maths the hole is just a hole to which the number is always the same regardless of the whole. ;) But if you must: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AckvdGbk4w Eels. they had a point, even with a polo on their face, elements of either not quite combini...

You're asking a question that cannot be answered by religious people. Religion is full of such questions, hence the apologetics movement in any religion. Suffice to say Jesus came to save mankind, from what in that time and why, and even how who alone knows? he just did, as to whether any such man d...