Search found 4224 matches
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:21 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: How can you KNOW the difference? which is which?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 305
Re: How can you KNOW the difference? which is which?
I agree with much of what you have said there . Extinction is the only way guaranteed to end human suffering in all of its various manifestations . Far from being something to be feared death is a release from such suffering and so should not be feared at all . I think death is eternal and that is t...
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 5:00 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Principle of causality does not apply to nothing
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3051
Re: Principle of causality does not apply to nothing
I am NOT attempting to be understood here in this forum You would have to wait till I write somewhere else and relate it back to what I post here to best understand the ME You may very well not be attempting to be understood here in the forum but that does not mean I should not try to understand yo...
- Thu Nov 26, 2020 3:09 pm
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Principle of causality does not apply to nothing
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3051
Re: Principle of causality does not apply to nothing
I will no longer be posting on the forum as it is not actually necessary for me to do so any moreAge wrote:
Good to see you back by the way
I will however carry on trying to understand you as best as I can based upon what you post here
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:46 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Mind
- Topic: Who's minding the mind?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 329
Re: Who's minding the mind?
Unfortunately I do not actually know what that question is
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:45 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Getting to the Heart of All Philosophical & Religious Dogmatic Jargon
- Replies: 11
- Views: 319
Re: Getting to the Heart of All Philosophical & Religious Dogmatic Jargon
I also want to know as much as possible but prefer to learn at a slow pace
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:42 am
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Principle of causality does not apply to nothing
- Replies: 117
- Views: 3051
Re: Principle of causality does not apply to nothing
I still have to read all of the posts you have just made but accept most of what you have said here
Some of it I do not really understand but shall just have to see if you will provide any clarification
Some of it I do not really understand but shall just have to see if you will provide any clarification
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:33 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: There is no personal God or impersonal God.
- Replies: 250
- Views: 4726
Re: There is no personal God or impersonal God.
I do not always understand both of you but I try to as best as I can
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:25 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: The Problem of Evil
- Replies: 236
- Views: 3740
Re: The Problem of Evil
Human beings can choose to do or not do evil because they have the freedom make both moral and immoral choices
This freedom exists whether or not there is a God and so in that respect it makes absolutely no difference either way
This freedom exists whether or not there is a God and so in that respect it makes absolutely no difference either way
- Wed Sep 23, 2020 12:28 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: social priorities
- Replies: 3
- Views: 257
Re: social priorities
So much could be achieved without them but they exist and so that has to be accepted
- Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:47 am
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: Quantity and Quality
- Replies: 7
- Views: 612
Re: Quantity and Quality
Different minds can observe the same thing simultaneously and yet have different subjective opinions with regard to its quality
No two will think exactly the same all of the time and so there is no universal standard for determining what quality actually is
No two will think exactly the same all of the time and so there is no universal standard for determining what quality actually is
- Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:24 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: social priorities
- Replies: 3
- Views: 257
Re: social priorities
Free will and non reciprocal altruism are obviously problematic but we have to work within our limitations
- Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:40 am
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: Big Question 1
- Replies: 44
- Views: 1431
Re: Big Question 1
Why do good people do bad things ? Labelling someone a good person just means that they do good things most of the time just not ALL of the time So it does not mean they cannot or do not do bad things as well but just not as often as the good things they do Equally too a bad person can do bad thing...
- Sat Sep 19, 2020 6:30 am
- Forum: Political Philosophy
- Topic: "There has never been true communism."
- Replies: 300
- Views: 6693
Re: "There has never been true communism."
One : we are not actually hardwired to be universally altruistic
Two : communism doesnt work because people like to own stuff as Frank Zappa said
The first applies to true communism and the second applies to economic communism
You all know the difference so I dont need to tell you what it is
Two : communism doesnt work because people like to own stuff as Frank Zappa said
The first applies to true communism and the second applies to economic communism
You all know the difference so I dont need to tell you what it is
- Wed Sep 16, 2020 1:43 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: There is No Distinction Between Appearances and Things in Themselves
- Replies: 73
- Views: 1684
Re: There is No Distinction Between Appearances and Things in Themselves
A false statement is as much a part of the Universe as a true statement is The important thing here is the fact that both types of statements can exist regardless of anything else A false statement is false in relation to the statement itself but not in relation to the fact that it exists A true sta...
- Wed Sep 16, 2020 11:44 am
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: ethical suppression of speech
- Replies: 102
- Views: 2358
Re: ethical suppression of speech
I would actually say that the human beings known as or who call themselves scientists are just as susceptible to their own biases as other human beings The ones that are called scientist just pretend or believe they are not and some others actually believe this What evidence do you have for this ? ...