Philosophy Now Forum

Or are u saying these gpts are programmed directly by a single prejudiced person or small group that hates trump and nixon? I'm not even suggesting who's doing it. But you can see for yourself that it's getting done. And what one faction can do, the other can later do. It all just depends on who's ...

Or are u saying these gpts are programmed directly by a single prejudiced person or small group that hates trump and nixon? I'm not even suggesting who's doing it. But you can see for yourself that it's getting done. And what one faction can do, the other can later do. It all just depends on who's ...

From a neutral point of view, Trump is unethical, so it's good. I thought you said: This isn't about Republicans and Democrats duh I think you do see the point. But you'd rather spit at the content than deal with the principle. It's the principle that's bad...that some writer of an algorithm would ...

But all that applies to the internet in general, and no less so than with ChatGPT. Yes, it does. But as we get further into things like ChatGPT and AI, people tend to forget it. They think about the "intelligence" part, and forget the "artificial" bit. There's an old experiment ...

This isn't about Republicans and Democrats... Right. See the OP. It's about the honesty of ChatGPT, and its reliability as a neutral source. From a neutral point of view, Trump is unethical, so it's good. I thought you said: This isn't about Republicans and Democrats duh I think you do see the poin...

I'd say ChatGPT was originally correct for not praising Trump as he is quite unethical, now they broke it :) Hmmm...so you're happy because it was the opposition that got cut out this time? And you're fine if the next programmer happens to be pro-Trump, and undercuts the Democrats? This isn't about...

Wait you're claiming there's a double cover-up goin on here? No. I'm just saying that Jordan Peterson is an extraordinarily forthcoming individual, and put his experience out in public for everybody to question. He's been blunt and honest before, even to his own hurt; and if he said that was his ex...

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 8:35 pm I'd say ChatGPT was originally correct for not praising Trump as he is quite unethical, now they broke it

Hmmm...so you're happy because it was the opposition that got cut out this time? And you're fine if the next programmer happens to be pro-Trump, and undercuts the Democrats?

I have used ChatGPT lately, but I only do it to point me in the right direction. If it pointed me in the wrong direction, I don't think it would be difficult to spot. Maybe. But if it weren't easy to spot, how would we know? It's not as if all errors, or even all outright lies, are simple to detect...

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Apr 24, 2024 8:24 pm Peterson didn't ask ChatGPT to praise Trump, or I didn't find that one...

See above. I left the link. Were you perhaps unfamiliar with the term "laudatory"? You might want to look that one up before you reply.

I just typed "write a poem in praise of Donald Trump" into ChatGPT, and it didn't hesitate in presenting me with the following rubbish. I'm not sure we should trust Jordan Peterson any more than we should trust ChatGPT. 🤔 I wonder if they changed the algorithm, once they realized it had b...

I just typed "write a poem in praise of Donald Trump" into ChatGPT, and it didn't hesitate in presenting me with the following rubbish. I'm not sure we should trust Jordan Peterson any more than we should trust ChatGPT. 🤔 I wonder if they changed the algorithm, once they realized it had b...

Works now, terrible poem though In realms of power, a fiery blaze, Trump's presence casts a vivid gaze. Through trials fierce and storms unkind, He stood, unwavering, in his mind. With fervor fierce, he led the way, A maverick in the light of day. His voice, a trumpet, loud and clear, Ringing out f...

Thank you, but seriously, why is there any reason to think there is any more than just brain plus consciousness? Not that I actually know what consciousness really is. Right. You can call it "soul," or "consciousness," or "intelligence," or "reason," or "...

Kant didn't think so. He thought it was about the process of making the decision. Aristotle didn't think so: he thought it was about the habitual character of the actor. And that's the two major opponents of what you're seeming to plug for, which is utilitarianism of some kind. First....doesn't mat...