Philosophy Now Forum

philosopher wrote: ↑

Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:15 pm

Why are you against me?

Because the three posts of yours that I've read indicate you have a very simplistic view of the World. You appear to see only in black and white.

philosopher wrote: ↑

Sun Sep 02, 2018 9:13 pm

Please provide an argument against this definition, if you disagree.

I don't disagree with the existing definition. I'm saying let's give it a new definition so it no longer applies to us.

philosopher wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 31, 2018 10:43 pm

I've noticed the lack of scientistics (adherents of Scientism, that is reductionist at core) on this forum. Why is it that Scientism is frown upon here?

I don't know what scientism is but if you are advocating it, that's a good enough reason to frown on it.

philosopher wrote: ↑

Sat Sep 01, 2018 8:09 pm

Humans are evil. No doubt about it.

Well humans invented the word along with it's definition. We could always change the definition so the description doesn't apply to most of us. Fixed.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 20, 2018 10:06 pm

I have an apple for you dearest teacher......bite me.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 20, 2018 9:46 pm

I have no idea what I’m talking about....it’s all but sound just bubbling up from the silence.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 20, 2018 8:04 pm

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

That makes a change; you usually have no idea of what you are talking about.

Well the unmoved life living itself doesn't have to move or do anything, but when it does move and do something, it will be because it was meant to move and do something, and it will not move or do something one nano second before it is meant to do it. And that movement will be known as knowledge. ...

Dontaskme wrote: ↑

Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:22 am

The only reason I am not a brain surgeon right now is because life has not yet evolved that skill in me.

If you are saying that life hasn't sent you to medical school in order to be educated in the skills of brain surgery, then I suppose you could look at it that way.

-1- wrote: ↑

Sun Jul 29, 2018 12:19 am

Not me. I'll kick him in the nuts for this.

You'd have to find him first. Greatest I am is always getting worked up over the actions of a God he doesn't believe exists, seems like a waste of energy, to me.

What is normally referred to as education is actually indoctrination. Most just accept its impartiality as fact. Those like Orwell, Einstein, Mark Twain and others saw it for what it is. Unless Orwell, Einstein, Mark Twain and others didn't have any education, it appears they managed to get through...

Dontaskme wrote: ↑

Sat Jul 28, 2018 8:14 pm

I never let any schooling(prison) - (artificial programming) get in the way of my education ~ DAM

So what did get in the way of it?

Consciousness is not measured by the ability to form sentences (computers and socialists can do that), but by the conceptual content within the sentences. And the example you provided: In the real world, consciousness is determined implicitly, in context measured in the favor of consciousness by th...

Greylorn Ell wrote: ↑

Wed Jul 25, 2018 9:13 pm

No computer I've constructed or programmed has greeted me upon a morning's fire-up with the message, Cogito ergo sum.

And how many people do you know who greet you like that? How long have you been suffering from this Descartes obsession of yours.

Greylorn Ell wrote: ↑

Tue Jul 24, 2018 11:17 pm

You give Hairball more credit than he warrants. He's clearly not studied Descartes,

Any idiot can study Descartes, but that would just make him an idiot who knows something about Descartes. I'm assuming that you have studied Descartes, in which case you prove my point.