Right a great extent.Felasco wrote:A child has only the mind of a child to go on. That doesn't equal what children think being true.chaz wyman wrote:You can accuse people of reducing the universe to the limits of human experience and sense, but that is all we will ever have to go on.
Search found 24 matches
- Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:35 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God + Allah = ?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 25148
Re: God + Allah = ?
- Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:33 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God + Allah = ?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 25148
Re: God + Allah = ?
Ok, fine.chaz wyman wrote: That is not important. I can find out enough to compare Spinoza to a whole host of other philosophies, but there is nothing on the one you mention in detail to make a comparison.
- Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:26 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God + Allah = ?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 25148
Re: God + Allah = ?
In which philosophy or religious belief, there is no patch or influence?chaz wyman wrote:
That does not make sense.
- Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:36 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God + Allah = ?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 25148
Re: God + Allah = ?
As the philosophy based on easter & western philosophies, it is normal that we may have patch in the philosophy.chaz wyman wrote: I'm not sure you have Spinoza right, and the stuff on Drishtantoism on the Internet is rather patchy.
- Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God can never be proven, so we are drishtantoist.
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1793
God can never be proven, so we are drishtantoist.
In Drishtantoism , God is not neglected but avoided. Here avoidance doesn’t mean opposing God but staying at a distance from the being. As God can never be proven, man has to be in the earth by the might of man-made philanthropic ethics. Shobuj Taposh acknowledges certainly that by opposing/neglecti...
- Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:42 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God + Allah = ?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 25148
Re: God + Allah = ?
Some scholars take Drishtantoism as a Spinozist version. It is their wrong business. It is different from Spinozism . Following Descartes , Spinoza said that we find the knowledge of God through reason. To him, the thing which is independent is substance. He took the substance as nature too. That is...
- Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:08 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God + Allah = ?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 25148
Re: God + Allah = ?
If I define "god" as "nature", as apparently the philosopher Spinoza did, I still don't think anybody knows very much about god. Drishtantoism is different from Spinozism. In Drishtantoism, God is not neglected but avoided. Here avoidance doesn’t mean opposing God but staying at...
- Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:42 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Be good only for saving yourself and the world
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2222
Be good only for saving yourself and the world
It is a Drishtantoist principle. According to Drishtantoism, I want to give a brief. The principle urges man to be good ethically. To Shobuj Taposh, if a man becomes so, he will express honest courage for saving himself. In this way, if all men save themselves ethically, the world will be saved from...
- Tue Nov 13, 2012 6:31 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God + Allah = ?
- Replies: 74
- Views: 25148
God + Allah = ?
It is a Drishtantoist question. Drishtantoism, established by Shobuj Taposh, follows the equation: God + Allah = there is nothing, though theist and atheist will/may say that the equation is the crop of bizarre thought and God+ Allah= 0 respectively. To say mathematically, God + God = 2God (If Allah...