Philosophy Now Forum

The only 'immorality' here is the one where posturing misogynistic religioturd males think they have a right to control women's reproduction. Reigiosity is anti-philosophy anyway. Religioturds are incapable of using logic and reason and as such should be barred from ever rearing their ugly heads in ...

gaffo wrote: ↑

Sun Jun 02, 2019 2:58 am

why provide a link to the lesser movie.

the original was the best one.

I agree. 'Remakes' are always so ridiculously over the top. Strangely, the old time special effects look a lot more real to me than today's overdone CGI.

it clear to all here that you "hate americans/american empire" (did you hate the English empire that rule prior? - too young? convenient since your NZ is a benificiary of the latter. I note your bias - "america bad" - do you even had the mind to think of the enlightenement concepts? - or too biased...

You are saying that, like the Americans you demean, grammar is unimportant to you when you semi-speak informal English. Who are you, I ask, to admonish those who use informal English? It seems to me that you might be one who feels superior to (all?) Americans, and who cannot stand missing an opport...

Immanuel Can I'm content. Others can assess our arguments. Thanks. In my assessment, Immanuel Can, your arguments reflect those of a complete fanatic devout theist piece of shit. The contents of your arguments are pieces of shit, too. I'm content with that. FYI, there is religionism and there is re...

I've always thought that philosophy was about thinking about things on a below-the-surface level. Every word in that article happens to be true. If that 'hurts the feelings' of some people then tough titty. Here's what I think of Harry J Bentham: He's a soft cock, socialist, brain-dead globalist, s...

You offer absolutely no evidence to back up your claim. Umm...I...didn't make a claim. :shock: I have no idea what "evidence" you would be expecting. I'm afraid I'm not finding your conversation style comprehensible. I think we'll go back to the original topic, and I'll continue with others. https:...

This American recognizes a sentence fragment when he sees one. This non-American recognises informal, semi-spoken English rather than formal English. You are saying that, like the Americans you demean, grammar is unimportant to you when you semi-speak informal English. Who are you, I ask, to admoni...

commonsense wrote: ↑

Sat Jun 01, 2019 12:33 am

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑

Thu May 30, 2019 11:34 pm

Obviously not to Americans.

This American recognizes a sentence fragment when he sees one.

This non-American recognises informal, semi-spoken English rather than formal English.

The question is whether abortion is moral. You say 'Moral claims can be factual as well. When one says, "Abortion is wrong," one is making a statement of fact.' This is false, You may (and I know you do) insist that it is false to say that moral claims are factual. I'm not disputing your saying it....

Spelling and grammar checks, voice recognition and auto correct solve many problems. Abbreviations and texting languages can be found in online dictionaries. In view of these tools, and because there are so many other subjects vying for the students’ attention, it is no longer feasible to teach spe...

Precisely my point. I don't see where you're disagreeing. I'm taking a slight issue with this claim: So we have a moral argument, not a dispute about facts. If there were facts, there could be no argument...the answers - yea or nay - express moral opinions, not factual claims. There are two things:...

:gun: :house: :girl: :truck: :lips: :hamburger: :pray: :cowboy: :bank: :milk: :cat: :ghost: :newspaper: :boom: :beer: :dog: :car: :pizza: :fist: :computer: :bikini: :walking: :horse: :mountain: :hotdog: :rocket: :star: :baseball: :muscle: :book: :heart: freedom, bitches More like 'Fuck you'. And lo...

Obviously not to Americans.

Odd that 'less than 3%' is now a 'very low number' while less than 1% and probably 0% is considered 'high' and something that needs to be discussed at great length. The statistics become either 'high' or 'low', depending on which 'argument' they are attempting to present......