Search found 12385 matches

by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 10:13 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Indirect Realism is Not Realistic
Replies: 10
Views: 96

Re: Indirect Realism is Not Realistic

Why would anyone seriously argue in 2024 that mind-independent objects don't change with (Einsteinian) time? Are you using a weird 300 years old idealist argument or something? Your thinking is totally bankrupt. The change of Einsteinian time is not an a priori intuition according to indirect reali...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 10:05 am
Forum: Philosophy of Religion
Topic: Kant: It is Impossible to Prove God Exists as Real
Replies: 20
Views: 169

Re: Kant: It is Impossible to Prove God Exists as Real

A FSRC exists wherever there is a collective-of-subjects [not one or a loose group of people] grounding upon an implicit or explicit constitution in relation to the realization and cognition of knowledge. A FSRC can be named in reference to the subject matter it is involved and there is no need for...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:48 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Indirect Realism is Not Realistic
Replies: 10
Views: 96

Re: Indirect Realism is Not Realistic

Your thinking is so bankrupt you don't even understand the issue and the problem. Re 1: or example, sense data constantly changes, but mind-independent objects do not. The perceptual variation argument demonstrates this: One moment my sense data may be of a square table, the next it’s diamond-shape...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 9:20 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Indirect Realism is Not Realistic
Replies: 10
Views: 96

Re: Indirect Realism is Not Realistic

VA wishes to be shown wrong once and for all. :) 1. Looks like an outdated idealist objection. Let's drop the nonsensical mental/material duality of Western philosophy. Sense data is of course "physical", we pick up data using our senses, and then the brain/mind creates a representation u...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:58 am
Forum: Philosophy of Religion
Topic: Kant: It is Impossible to Prove God Exists as Real
Replies: 20
Views: 169

Re: Kant: It is Impossible to Prove God Exists as Real

I have demonstrated, the scientific FSRC has the highest degree of credibility and objectivity, thus is taken as the golden standard and indexed say at 100/100 where all FSRC are contrasted. You claimed it, yes. And within what FSRC was this assertion conditioned on? What is the name of that FSRC? ...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 8:23 am
Forum: Philosophy of Religion
Topic: Kant: It is Impossible to Prove God Exists as Real
Replies: 20
Views: 169

Re: Kant: It is Impossible to Prove God Exists as Real

But if all facts are based on frameworks and systems of knowledge, and nothing can be deemed true or false if you're operating outside of that framework and system of knowledge, then all I have to do is declare a FSK where 'God exists as Real' is true - or, more briefly for the native english speak...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:44 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Indirect Realism is Not Realistic
Replies: 10
Views: 96

Indirect Realism is Not Realistic

Atla had been claiming Indirect Realism is realistic in contrast to say Kant's Empirical Realism - Transcendental Idealism. The so-called realists has hijacked and bastardized the term 'real' with their ideology of realism. In serious philosophical consideration Indirect Realism is not realistic as...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:14 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: AI's Water Level Effect: e.g. Atla
Replies: 22
Views: 203

Re: AI's Water Level Effect: e.g. Atla

Again, here is the nuance from your OP: Wiki disagrees with you. ChatGPT disagrees with you. They agree with me. It's called mind-independence, not absolute independence. Where are YOU getting your definition from? Your above is a strawman in relation to my argument: You did not specify the context...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:12 am
Forum: Ethical Theory
Topic: The Transcendental-Idealism-FSRC is outdated
Replies: 46
Views: 547

Re: The Transcendental-Idealism-FSRC is outdated

Lol --------------------- Again you are very deceptive and a cheater. ChatGpt wrote the following: Direct and indirect realists indeed argue for the mind's independence from the external world in a more absolute sense, emphasizing that the external world exists independently of our perceptions or m...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:00 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: AI's Water Level Effect: e.g. Atla
Replies: 22
Views: 203

Re: AI's Water Level Effect: e.g. Atla

I use the Wiki definition. I asked: where do you see "absolute independence" in it? What happened to your brain and cognitive abilities. I have already explain WIKI in general do not go into the details and the very nuanced aspects. Good philosophy necessitate dealing with the nuances of ...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:55 am
Forum: Ethical Theory
Topic: The Transcendental-Idealism-FSRC is outdated
Replies: 46
Views: 547

Re: The Transcendental-Idealism-FSRC is outdated

Wtf, you don't know what "more" means? :) You are so stupid and creating strawman all the time. You are such a cheater as usual. Why don't you address my point directly when asking ChatGpt; It is more sweet, then it must be sweet and not otherwise. If apple A is more sweet than apple B, t...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:24 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: AI's Water Level Effect: e.g. Atla
Replies: 22
Views: 203

Re: AI's Water Level Effect: e.g. Atla

Where do you see "absolute independence" in the definition you quoted? This is really stupid. Where is "your" definition and understanding of "Indirect Realism"? WIKI or even ChatGpt will always start with the general definition. Mind-independence is implied in "d...
by Veritas Aequitas
Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:20 am
Forum: Ethical Theory
Topic: The Transcendental-Idealism-FSRC is outdated
Replies: 46
Views: 547

Re: The Transcendental-Idealism-FSRC is outdated

What?? Isn't it true that 'more x' then it must be x and not y. It is more sweet, then it must be sweet and not otherwise. So, 'more absolute' surely mean it must be absolute and not the opposite, i.e. relative. If not, sure, ask ChatGpt. Wtf, you don't know what "more" means? :) If A is ...