Search found 12247 matches
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:58 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: What could make morality objective?
- Replies: 9756
- Views: 1025299
Re: What could make morality objective?
... Failed again. You're not actually addressing my argument and trying to refute it. You claim to have set out 'the generally accepted criteria any rational person would readily accept' in assessing and comparing models of reality. But you refuse to acknowledge that, given your FSRC theory, such c...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:46 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
- Replies: 37
- Views: 411
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:44 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
- Replies: 37
- Views: 411
Re: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
I define morality & ethics as the management and modulation of evil to enable its related good. How do you determine what is evil and what is good? I only define what is evil and its related evil acts. Thus I will have to come up with a complete list of what is defined as evil with its varying ...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:36 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Theory of Mind?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 32
Theory of Mind?
I wrote this; All Philosophies are Reducible to ‘p-Realism’ vs anti-p-realism [Idealism] https://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=28643 The above dichotomy between p-realism vs anti-p-realism emerged since the origin of philosophy. P-realism [mind-independent] arising from the sense o...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 10:02 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
- Replies: 37
- Views: 411
Re: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
Take the case of empathy which is one very critical element of morality. I don't think that empathy has anything to do with morality. We need to define morality-proper. I define morality & ethics as the management and modulation of evil to enable its related good. Thus the focus is to cultivate...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:29 am
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Is Hegel Still Relevant?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 15242
Re: Is Hegel Still Relevant?
Hi, I have read about the progression of consciousness through the various stages down to absolute Spirit, and I am baffled cause I see none of it in real life. Most of the people are stuck in their daily affairs and there is no hint of basic progress, let alone aiming at absolute knowledge. Anyone...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:33 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Excel to Analyze Quranic Verses in 1400 Themes - Useless??
- Replies: 13
- Views: 190
Re: Excel to Analyze Quranic Verses in 1400 Themes - Useless??
So the AI isn't good enough yet to ask why are you even doing this thing at all? The entire idea is the pointless bit. Better ways of doing the pointless thing would still be pointless. Have you noticed anyone supporting your mad idea in this thread or really anywhere else? Any human that is.... Yo...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:19 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:04 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
Re: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
Notes:
Method of Rating Credibility and Objectivity of FSK using rationally & generally accepted criteria with weights;
Methodology of Rating Objectivity of FSK
viewtopic.php?t=41096
Method of Rating Credibility and Objectivity of FSK using rationally & generally accepted criteria with weights;
Methodology of Rating Objectivity of FSK
viewtopic.php?t=41096
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:04 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:04 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
Re: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
3 So your FSRC theory can't explain why the natural sciences are the 'gold standard' for providing knowledge of reality. Your theory undermines or contradicts that claim. I have explained the gold standard is based on criteria accepted by rational basis. It amounts to using a model to assess models...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:01 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
Since this point is raised frequently, here is a separate thread to address the issue; I don't misunderstand your argument. It's just fallacious. Your FSRC theory provides no basis for assessing the credibility, reliability or objectivity of a practice and discourse that produces knowledge - and so ...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:31 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
- Replies: 191
- Views: 20494
Re: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
Already did that. I highlighted the words you quoted in the OP in the photo below. Now just read the sentence that I underlined following it. That proves that you have been wrong about the contents of the essay all along. A very major part of what has gone wrong here is that you never learned the b...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:06 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Excel to Analyze Quranic Verses in 1400 Themes - Useless??
- Replies: 13
- Views: 190
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:01 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: W's "On Certainty" is a Subset of the FSRC
- Replies: 13
- Views: 133
Re: W's "On Certainty" is a Subset of the FSRC
Why waste your time on all 676? Your work with the first 16 is shit. All you've done is assert nonsense about KFC-buckes in [blue brackets] . You can continue to the end of the book or just declare victory now and stop, it makes difference, no knowledge about Wittgenstein is uncovered by it and we ...