Search found 12242 matches
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:29 am
- Forum: Metaphysics
- Topic: Is Hegel Still Relevant?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 15231
Re: Is Hegel Still Relevant?
Hi, I have read about the progression of consciousness through the various stages down to absolute Spirit, and I am baffled cause I see none of it in real life. Most of the people are stuck in their daily affairs and there is no hint of basic progress, let alone aiming at absolute knowledge. Anyone...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:33 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Excel to Analyze Quranic Verses in 1400 Themes - Useless??
- Replies: 13
- Views: 178
Re: Excel to Analyze Quranic Verses in 1400 Themes - Useless??
So the AI isn't good enough yet to ask why are you even doing this thing at all? The entire idea is the pointless bit. Better ways of doing the pointless thing would still be pointless. Have you noticed anyone supporting your mad idea in this thread or really anywhere else? Any human that is.... Yo...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:19 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 38
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:04 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 38
Re: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
Notes:
Method of Rating Credibility and Objectivity of FSK using rationally & generally accepted criteria with weights;
Methodology of Rating Objectivity of FSK
viewtopic.php?t=41096
Method of Rating Credibility and Objectivity of FSK using rationally & generally accepted criteria with weights;
Methodology of Rating Objectivity of FSK
viewtopic.php?t=41096
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:04 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 38
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:04 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 38
Re: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
3 So your FSRC theory can't explain why the natural sciences are the 'gold standard' for providing knowledge of reality. Your theory undermines or contradicts that claim. I have explained the gold standard is based on criteria accepted by rational basis. It amounts to using a model to assess models...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:01 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
- Replies: 4
- Views: 38
Avoiding Circularity in Assessing Objectivity of FSRC
Since this point is raised frequently, here is a separate thread to address the issue; I don't misunderstand your argument. It's just fallacious. Your FSRC theory provides no basis for assessing the credibility, reliability or objectivity of a practice and discourse that produces knowledge - and so ...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:31 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
- Replies: 191
- Views: 20491
Re: Moral Fact Deniers Has Cognitive Deficit in Morality
Already did that. I highlighted the words you quoted in the OP in the photo below. Now just read the sentence that I underlined following it. That proves that you have been wrong about the contents of the essay all along. A very major part of what has gone wrong here is that you never learned the b...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:06 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Excel to Analyze Quranic Verses in 1400 Themes - Useless??
- Replies: 13
- Views: 178
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:01 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: W's "On Certainty" is a Subset of the FSRC
- Replies: 13
- Views: 128
Re: W's "On Certainty" is a Subset of the FSRC
Why waste your time on all 676? Your work with the first 16 is shit. All you've done is assert nonsense about KFC-buckes in [blue brackets] . You can continue to the end of the book or just declare victory now and stop, it makes difference, no knowledge about Wittgenstein is uncovered by it and we ...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 3:32 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: FDP has a Cognitive Moral Deficit in Morality
- Replies: 38
- Views: 483
FDP has a Cognitive Moral Deficit
........ That's all there is to the matter. I have now explained what Boyd was saying in the passage you took to be describing an argument that I am lacking cognitive function. We now can see that mine is not the cognitive function that we ought to be questioning. I cannot see your point clearly if...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:55 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: What could make morality objective?
- Replies: 9753
- Views: 1025093
Re: What could make morality objective?
... Failed again. You're not actually addressing my argument and trying to refute it. You claim to have set out 'the generally accepted criteria any rational person would readily accept' in assessing and comparing models of reality. But you refuse to acknowledge that, given your FSRC theory, such c...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:20 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
- Replies: 29
- Views: 342
Re: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
Moral Relativists are the same as Moral Realists. Note as defined in meta-ethics Moral Objectivists are just deluded, fascistic, authoritarians. I linked somewhere to you but you ignored or cannot comprehend your own ignorance: https://forum.philosophynow.org/viewtopic.php?p=702192#p702192 There ar...
- Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:12 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
- Replies: 29
- Views: 342
Re: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
... the scientific FSRC as the gold standard... I don't think that morality can find any ground on science, because science doesn't say anything about what is good and what is bad. Obviously, a morality that takes science into consideration is stronger than a morality that doesn't. I said "str...
- Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:52 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
- Replies: 29
- Views: 342
Re: Moral Relativists Should Tolerate Moral Realism
... no one would deny it is objective to all humans. The fact that no one denies something doesn't mean so much. If no one denies that the planet earth is flat, this doesn't make the planet earth flat. I think the essential point is when you talk about frameworked objectivity. It means that you adm...