Philosophy Now Forum

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 5:28 pm

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 5:16 pm

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 5:15 pm
What do you mean by words are equivalent?

They both refer to "everything". Or does the multiverse not include everything?

Ok you don't know what "topics" are. Hmm

I don't speak French either. Maybe I need a translator?

Maybe you don't know what a "topic" is. So when I say stuff like "multiverse topic", you don't know how to separate that from other stuff. If the words are equivalent, then what difference does it make? What do you mean by words are equivalent? They both refer to "everythin...

Usually, everything = multiverse. I see. What if I refer to everything as the "universe", am I wrong to call it that? Maybe you don't know what a "topic" is. So when I say stuff like "multiverse topic", you don't know how to separate that from other stuff. If the words...

In multiverse topics, "universe" doesn't mean absolutely everything. Which part of this escapes your understanding? Then what do you call everything? Just "everything"? Usually, everything = multiverse. I see. What if I refer to everything as the "universe", am I wrong...

Not considering hypothetical extensions to the world we see, is the end of philosophy, but of course idiots like this one don't even understand this much I'm sure you're not an idiot. You're probably very intelligent. You just need to get terminology straight. And it's not your fault. So don't be h...

Just fuck off Poor thing. Whatever you want, dude. Not considering hypothetical extensions to the world we see, is the end of philosophy, but of course idiots like this one don't even understand this much I'm sure you're not an idiot. You're probably very intelligent. You just need to get terminolo...

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:48 pm Faith is the easy way out.
It is unnecessary and injurious

You're probably right. I've had it with all the religions and pseudo religions. I'm more interested in what scientists have to say about the real world.

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:47 pm Just fuck off

Poor thing. Whatever you want, dude.

There's nothing wrong with the terminology, it's just not compatible with the old definition of universe. There is no "old" definition of "universe". The universe has been much the same since the beginning of human civilization. The "multiverse" theory isn't even incor...

Why the hell would you agree with Age's point. In a multiverse topic, by definition the totality of all multiverses is not the universe. Because the "multiverse" is a bunch of nonsensical sophistry. It's a joke of a theory. It can't even get its terminology straight. There's nothing wrong...

Religion does not make use of mathematics. The reason why is simple. If it did, most people would not understand it. I agree with Age's point that if there is a "multiverse" then the totality of all multiverses is, by definition, the universe. Even a dumb "hick" like me isn't as...

The only ontology that requires true "insight", is the Platonic one. Like religion huh Religion does not make use of mathematics. The reason why is simple. If it did, most people would not understand it. I agree with Age's point that if there is a "multiverse" then the totality ...

Why "shouldn't" eternal peace exist? What's ever wrong with peace? Is there such a thing as too peaceful or not enough strife? Pretty much this: Becuz in perfect peaceful circumstances there can be no improvement... becuz there is no conflict, nothing struggling. Question is, is improveme...

I think "How can world peace be achieved" is a better way of framing the question. It eliminates the "we/they" distinction and throws it back on the lap of each of us, I suppose. It also frames it as a "to do" list for cooperative effort, instead of some heroic conspira...

OK. It's back to instantaneous.