Philosophy Now Forum

If you define it: you, at the same time refute it. So you define it and you have the implausibility of it is the same words. It's an idea that serves no purpose and answers no question; a solution without a problem. The evidence seem to point to a world which changes and evolves by a material cause...

To describe god as "all" ,does not suggest it has a brain, thought ,a consciousness , power or influence on anything . what your describing is the physical world , stars and planets , and this is somehow controlled by the nothing again ,,??? if god is everything , everything doesn't have ...

Chaz, in a hypothetical world where there is a Chaz that is theist, would he consider panentheism (not pantheism) as plausible? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism You mean in a hypothetical world where there was a Chaz that was not Chaz, would he think pantheism plausible.? I don't know, I am...

I checked out your panentheism , from an Atheists perspective , it's which version of the fantasy are we talking about , so on that level , it makes little or no difference which type of blaablaatheist, Proof beyond reasonable doubt ,, so lets see some , you have made the claim , it would be a some...

Objective proof , could you explain , put it so even the likes of Chaz could get it , objective , do you mean ,REAL ,,,ACTUAL ,,,PROOF ,,??? so you are admitting there is no real proof ,,?? someone said there was proof , who was that idiot ,,?? who among us is stupid enough to try and present proof...

Chaz, in a hypothetical world where there is a Chaz that is theist, would he consider panentheism (not pantheism) as plausible?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism

So just on the ''off'' chance that God actually does exist, would you not agree it is more rational to behave as if there is one? Isn't this a version of Pascal's Wager? How do you think people who believe in god behave differently to those who don't? Perhaps... I dont think people that believe in ...

] I agree YOU have no proof of God, so you have made the ASSumption there isnt one. there is no unbroken line from this world to god , it requires the leap , so thats the irrational part , the leap , if you understand language at all , you must realize a leap of faith is there to cross the gap , be...

Re: What Do Pictures Want?

what wants want?

Belief in god is irrational , lets examine irrational , impulsive ,not thought through , unfounded , because we have NO PROOF for the existence of god , we have to do the leap of faith thing , I agree YOU have no proof of God, so you have made the ASSumption there isnt one. there is no unbroken lin...

Lets define God as:- 1. All knowing (apart from the future). 2. Having the ability to judge and reincarnate 'souls'. Yes. That is no kind of omniscience at all. What's the use of knowing everything is you don't how how to use that information? Why have you placed such an artificial restriction on g...

While society blames god for our misery, we will never address the real cause of the problems , the ancients thought , if the crops failed , we need to sacrifice a few more virgins , or first born sons etc , most of the religious wars are people defending what they imagine , is gods honour , that h...

1. All knowing ,,, is that , all knowing but just didn't tell us ,,??? it knew about the Dinosaurs , but didn't tell us ,,?? knew that we evolved from monkey , but instead feeds us a pack of lies ,,???? here's how it is mate , YOUR fictitious being knows everything , you think it should know , it k...

Yes. That is no kind of omniscience at all. What's the use of knowing everything is you don't how how to use that information? Why have you placed such an artificial restriction on god. But think about it. If I do not know the future, I can't do anything. Even for me to act in the most basic way in...