Philosophy Now Forum

H

. Maybe my response here to HH might help toward your suggestion. No. Actually your response didn't help at all. The more I see how your mind works, the more I understand how your inability to write and your naturally occurring thought process undermines any possible insight you may possess. Good l...

Ah - please indulge me and answer me this:

is there a One reality?

Lol. D was a bit 'deluz-insal'. But no less than Hex babble.

Well it's as I thought. But i Thot I give it a try and see if anyone is interested in more that their own belief systems.

Have fun repeating yourselves.

Thanks Bill for what OP means. And thanks for the prompt. Maybe my response here to HH might help toward your suggestion. (Please excuse my not using the PN formatting for the quote; I wrote this reply on a separate app) Maybe I'm being as obstinate as HH; so I will address his comments. L4: " ...

So the general thesis has been verified by the obviously offended response from HH. Thank you for your valuable input HH. I appreciate your effort. I'm sure there are others in this forum who might have a more sensible and rational approach to philosophical critique and interactive learning, a manne...

HH: there are many ideas in your reply that have loose meaning. Perhaps you can pick one term or idea you disagree with then we can find out if I am incorrect. For as it is, you are proving to me I am correct by your response.

At risk of exposing my density - I just saw that if one reads this part 2 by itself, it does seem like a political philosophy type. :). It seems people are reading it, but saying nothing. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. I just read the bit you posted and I assumed it was political philosophy...

HexHammer wrote:OP is pure ramblings, not a tiny bit of sound thinking.

Everything is rave and babble.

OP? What is OP?

Can you tell me how or what specifically in my essay is unsound?

Can you be specific? Can you unpack how a specific phrase is babble?

At risk of exposing my density - I just saw that if one reads this part 2 by itself, it does seem like a political philosophy type. . It seems people are reading it, but saying nothing.

Any comments? Rebuttals ? Suggestions?

Funny; that emoticon that appeared at the end of the Bill sentence is not the one that I thot I put. I meant to put a happy face :D that one that appears is like...unhappy startled. That's definitely not what I meant to put. :D - You know, to have a new voice giving me input is like a breath a fresh...

Thanks G. I appreciate whatever input you, and others, might have. Even Bills is welcomed.)

Ginkgo - for sure, such a discussion on truth and reality should have something of Hegel in it. Not specifically here though. I do not address his dialectic here; but indeed there is something dialectical involved. I lean more toward what Kiekegaard has to say of dialectic.