Search found 322 matches

by Mark Question
Tue Aug 26, 2014 5:41 am
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: Epistemology defeats itself with its own premisese
Replies: 30
Views: 7238

Re: Epistemology defeats itself with its own premisese

russel did some logical thinking and found out that there is logically no class, without being a member of itself. paradox means illogical. Yes, so one solution to this problem was to create additional axioms which excluded any class as being a member of itself. logically all classes have to be mem...
by Mark Question
Tue Aug 26, 2014 5:37 am
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: Epistemology defeats itself with its own premisese
Replies: 30
Views: 7238

Re: Epistemology defeats itself with its own premisese

Arising_uk, -No, I was really considering some truths. I do not know all the historic work of Goedel, but it seems to be extensible to any formalism. The reason is: it would lead to a circular reasoning. It has at most consistance, but it cannot "proof" itself under the proof considerations of the ...
by Mark Question
Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:25 am
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: Epistemology defeats itself with its own premisese
Replies: 30
Views: 7238

Re: Epistemology defeats itself with its own premisese

... See Godel theorem about this problematic. Never really understood this theorem but doesn't it just show that Maths and Logic are not the same thing? As as far as I understood it Russell logicized Number and Godel mathematised his logic and then used mathematical operations to produced what he s...
by Mark Question
Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:05 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?
Replies: 39
Views: 4729

Re: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?

This is a good indication of why cozy chatters (socalled philosophers) are utterly useless, as they exorbiant amount of time on very basic things. They would be fired from any serious buisness, when they can't make a simple correspondence with another person, but begins to ask having basic words ex...
by Mark Question
Fri Aug 22, 2014 10:57 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?
Replies: 39
Views: 4729

Re: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?

Ginkgo Difference is, science needs to test thus leading to proof and evidense, philosophy only thinks and spekulates. In philosophy logical argumentation is The Test. Logical (only empirical) argumentation is also The test in empirical science. You need philosophy when you try to argument why mone...
by Mark Question
Fri Aug 22, 2014 5:07 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?
Replies: 39
Views: 4729

Re: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?

Ginkgo Difference is, science needs to test thus leading to proof and evidense, philosophy only thinks and spekulates. In philosophy logical argumentation is The Test. Logical (only empirical) argumentation is also The test in empirical science. You need philosophy when you try to argument why mone...
by Mark Question
Wed Aug 20, 2014 8:35 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?
Replies: 39
Views: 4729

Re: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?

This is a good indication of why cozy chatters (socalled philosophers) are utterly useless, as they exorbiant amount of time on very basic things. They would be fired from any serious buisness, when they can't make a simple correspondence with another person, but begins to ask having basic words ex...
by Mark Question
Wed Aug 20, 2014 5:22 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?
Replies: 39
Views: 4729

Re: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?

Language is a language. Logic is a method in more or less logical language. Hi Mark, I don't even think that logic is a method, because its premisses can lead to any construction. Moreover, using "more or less logical language", you obviously refer to different kinds of logics. Some consider logic ...
by Mark Question
Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:29 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?
Replies: 39
Views: 4729

Re: Any Wittgenstein Followers here?

Language is a language. Logic is a method in more or less logical language. Earth is spherical Orange is spherical Earth is orange Orange is fruit Earth is not fruit Earth is not orange Earths shape is spherical Oranges shape is spherical Earths shape is oranges shape Logical truth is 100% logically...
by Mark Question
Mon Aug 04, 2014 4:16 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: A Measure of Truth
Replies: 64
Views: 15545

Re: A Measure of Truth

T his is but an illusion, some times things are very counter intuitive, or some times it requires specific knowledge, and so far you have only given feeble examples 1st graders could come up with. intuitive knowledge and specific knowledge are logically reasoned examples and logical answers by you....
by Mark Question
Sun Aug 03, 2014 10:10 am
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: A Measure of Truth
Replies: 64
Views: 15545

Re: A Measure of Truth

logical reasons are logical. This is but an illusion, some times things are very counter intuitive, or some times it requires specific knowledge, and so far you have only given feeble examples 1st graders could come up with. intuitive knowledge and specific knowledge are logically reasoned examples...
by Mark Question
Fri Aug 01, 2014 7:37 am
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: A Measure of Truth
Replies: 64
Views: 15545

Re: A Measure of Truth

You havn't answerd either of the questions, so it's illogical. do you have logical answers to those questions? The M16 in it's early years got rusty, thus jammed and was more trouble than it was worth. But it was soon upgraded with better alloys thus it worked quite well, but still jammed much more...
by Mark Question
Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:31 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: A Measure of Truth
Replies: 64
Views: 15545

Re: A Measure of Truth

HexHammer wrote:
Mark Question wrote:logical reasons are logical.
You havn't answerd either of the questions, so it's illogical.
do you have logical answers to those questions?
by Mark Question
Thu Jul 31, 2014 10:18 am
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: A Measure of Truth
Replies: 64
Views: 15545

Re: A Measure of Truth

logical reasons are logical.
by Mark Question
Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:56 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: A Measure of Truth
Replies: 64
Views: 15545

Re: A Measure of Truth

Mark Question You have no idea what you are talking about. Then tell me how the M16 was described before the Nam war, and in the early stages and late. Or just tell me how a buddy of mine who's father in law had his sperm channel removed so he was sterelized, but his wife still got pregnant! How? i...