Philosophy Now Forum

promethean75 wrote, Do u even know who Hume was? He wuz a rastafarian rationalist. A very, very important one in epistemology. Having, written a thesis about Hume, yes. David Hume, 1711-1776, CE was an a posteriori philosopher. We have never seen the universe made, as we reason from a watch to a wat...

I used the correct format for the Work Cited page, but it did not post correctly.

Thank-you dear sir, Anglican Priest: Peter Mullen. Regaining, the method of truth through reasoning is a tool, which you have proven. Knowing, philosophy has its own baggage, implying that God exists was a necessary truth. Thank-you, Sir. :idea: Work Cited :idea: Mullen, Peter. “The Ontological Argu...

Aha, Issue 152 what an accomplishment might be produced, live long and prosper.

Buddha did not accept a single god or a permanent self. Asat or Sat from Rig Veda 10.129. Composing, around 1200 BCE early priests asked question as the Vedic tradition evolved in explanation. The atman meaning personalities or the brahman meant prayer. External reality, the self, and ritual or symb...

This discussion is just a diatribe of opinions of people's ability to speak that does not make them smart. Most of this discussion, is you name the fallacy because most of the argument is a fallacy. Try and argue, the British Analytical this would give you at least a thesis. Each discipline argues f...

A community college class just taken on the New Testament, would change your thinking. Ancient writings become intelligible, may become faith. Think and become coherent, use your ability to reason. Nietzsche and his aphorisms are not coherent, you do not understand, ‘God is dead’ because it is an ec...

Nihil, not being a philosophical theory officially. As I was taught, “You can only think of the concept of nothingness…”

Being, very heuristic in the realm of absolute truths that were provable. An a priori and Kantian truth, you were proving epistemological solipsism. The claims is dependent upon subjective taste to be arguable. Replace your opinions or aspects of it with a necessary order, the Greek word phusis or p...

Having, written a response of nonsense. Coming, to the conclusion that the terms needed learning, from a dictionary or college and or both. I could not come down to a thesis with main ideas only that you need to learn the Latin terms probare from the noun probus pro and be. Absolute truths were of a...

Ataraxia and the skeptics following Pyrro and the ought about knowledge. Reasonableness in their matters, yes, there was no certainty. Plato and Socrates wanted to find the truth. The article was really existential and true about the mysteries of life. Believing, in a paraphrase of Pojman, “...Under...

Needing, to apply the principle of charity, of which I was reminded, and not merely to win the argument. Going, for the jugular and then manufacturing direct data and with appeals does little to advance knowledge or understanding. “Scientia potentia est.” by Meditationes Sacrae, circa 1597 CE.

Phil8659 prove that religion and science?

Focusing, on the tree of knowledge of good and evil, symbolizing wisdom ( The Bible , The New Oxford Annotated Bible Fourth Edition New Revised Standard Version With Apocrypha, 2010 CE, 2 Sam 14.17, Kings 3.9.) “Know that the welfare of everything…Consists in the mixture of good and evil…If evil wer...

A human being seventeenth century CE was capable of making a choices, yes analytically, "One who solves problems." According, to Immanuel Kant existence was not a predicate. Tolerances were tactic, and to be proved, however your use of the term, you choose your opinions. Metaethical, for m...