Search found 628 matches
- Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:48 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: BRIEF HISTORY of SYMMETRY and ASYMMETRY. / by Socratus /
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2054
BRIEF HISTORY of SYMMETRY and ASYMMETRY. / by Socratus /
BRIEF HISTORY of SYMMETRY and ASYMMETRY. / by Socratus / =====… a) In 1905 Einstein involved negative time in his SRT. b) Nobody knew what negative time can mean and therefore Minkowski in 1908 changed negative time into positive time creating 4-D spacetime. The theory became very bea...
- Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:58 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
Re: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
Infinity, nothingness, time, elementary particles were objects of primal perception. They were described in different ancient books . . . for example Vedas . . . . . purusha and pracriti . . . . . . Hermetic Principles . . . Later these objects became objects of science. The science has own language...
- Mon Nov 21, 2016 2:23 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
Re: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
Book: The quantum self It might even give us some ground to speculate that the vacuum itself (and hence the universe) is ‘conscious. / page 208. by Danah Zohar. / # If we were looking for something that we could conceive of as God within the universe of the new physics, this ground state, coherent q...
- Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:46 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
Re: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
Why is nothing would be something? # a) We cannot reach T=0K. b) We cannot reach the density of “virtual particles” –E=Mc^2 c) It means it is impossible to observe them directly by scientific tools and therefore T=0K and –E=Mc^2 are “nothing” for scientists who want observe these parameters by tools...
- Sat Oct 15, 2016 2:19 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
Re: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
a) The source of everything is an infinite Energy of Nothing: T=0K.. b) Infinite Energy - Nothing is a flat continuum. c) Infinite Nothing is filled by so-called “ virtual particles”. d) Infinite Nothing (T=0K) created these “potential virtual particles” in “His/Her/Its” own flat image (!). From all...
- Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:13 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
Re: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
Who is the greatest mathematician?
Scientists discuss “ the three body problem” of motion and
GOD solved the problem of eight planets and their satellites
movement in our solar system.
Conclusion:
We still don’t grow enough to understand God and His mathematics.
============…
Scientists discuss “ the three body problem” of motion and
GOD solved the problem of eight planets and their satellites
movement in our solar system.
Conclusion:
We still don’t grow enough to understand God and His mathematics.
============…
- Fri Oct 14, 2016 3:50 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
Re: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
Rereading: Why is there something rather than nothing? By Robert Adler 6 November 2014 “Here, then, is how everything could have come from nothing.” http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20141106-why-does-anything-exist-at-all ========… My opinion. a) Everything was created from a infinite Energy of Nothin...
- Thu Oct 13, 2016 4:18 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
Re: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
We are surrounded by THINGS (as outside in nature as inside in our brains)
and we don’t leave place for NOTHING and it is a pity because NOTHING
can tell us something important about THINGS.
============…
and we don’t leave place for NOTHING and it is a pity because NOTHING
can tell us something important about THINGS.
============…
- Wed Oct 12, 2016 3:51 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
- Replies: 20
- Views: 7951
THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/
THE SCIENTIFIC GOD. /by Socratus/ ==.. God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. Yet his shadow still looms. / Friedrich Nietzsche / ==.. Every generation of people kills God but “his shadow still looms” Why? Why is there something rather than nothing? By Robert Adler 6 November 2014 ==...
- Fri Oct 07, 2016 6:29 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Should we be afraid of Artificial Intelligence?
- Replies: 77
- Views: 22902
Re: Should we be afraid of Artificial Intelligence?
On the tablet of stone given to Moses words
were written with the finger of God:
“Globalization – Robotization - Orwell’s world ”.
/ imitation to Exodus 31:18 /
===.
were written with the finger of God:
“Globalization – Robotization - Orwell’s world ”.
/ imitation to Exodus 31:18 /
===.
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:39 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Should we be afraid of Artificial Intelligence?
- Replies: 77
- Views: 22902
Re: Should we be afraid of Artificial Intelligence?
“The Global Pyramid” & Who Really Controls Our Planet. Posted on July 13, 2015 by Royce Christyn in Conspiracies http://yournewswire.com/the-global-pyramid-who-really-controls-our-planet/ ==================… An elite control government. Government control robots Robots control human’s herd. ====...
- Sun Oct 02, 2016 11:05 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Should we be afraid of Artificial Intelligence?
- Replies: 77
- Views: 22902
Should we be afraid of Artificial Intelligence?
Should we be afraid of Artificial Intelligence? ==. Very soon your will speak with a man who smokes cigarette, drinks coffee, emits beam of benevolent energy over you and when you go out in joy - you wouldn’t know that you spoke with robot system R- 3141592. If later you know the truth . . . then, m...
- Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:44 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
- Replies: 25
- Views: 8647
Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
The essence of SRT and QED.
===…
a) SRT.
SRT explains behavior of photon / electron in vacuum.
b) QED.
QED explains interaction of photon / electron with matter.
=========…
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==========…
===…
a) SRT.
SRT explains behavior of photon / electron in vacuum.
b) QED.
QED explains interaction of photon / electron with matter.
=========…
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==========…
- Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:34 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
- Replies: 25
- Views: 8647
Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
The Multiverse and Gods. ======… There are many spaces in Physics. a) SRT has Minkowski spacetime. b) Quantum mechanics first of all is h (!) and h (!) was born from the Kirchhoff 's space - “black body” c) String theory . . . Oh ! String theory is very rich, it has many spaces: 11-D space, 27-D spa...
- Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:50 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
- Replies: 25
- Views: 8647
Re: Scientific logic. / by Socratus /
The essence of motion. ==.. There are two states of love: a) The state “I love” b) The state “ to be loved” Everybody knows that they are two different states. There are two states of motion: a) The state “I move” (self-motion) b) The state “ to be moved” Everybody knows that they are two different...