Philosophy Now Forum

I don't know if there's some sick attention going on (by people connected to this site), but I have the suspicion for this and sufficiently so in my own view. This is therefore my last post here for all foreseeable future. I'll see what comes up, but if this is the case then this is strange/bizarre ...

Upon the NASA news of this: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/18may_orphanplanets/ . Are the planets without the gravity center of a sun/star making up for the alleged Dark Matter? Is therefore Dark Matter a bad physics/astronomy joke? Read about it yourself if you want to. I...

The above writing relates in big parts to my declaration of the Standard Model to be complete. It follows: "The Standard Model of Elementary Particles May Now Be Complete!" (Posted by Terje Lea 2011-05-15 19:28:16) By my writings (these 2 below) and given that no new elementary particles a...

I've recently posted some more writing on my blogs concerning the Standard Model of Physics. It goes, 2011-05-17 01:14:59, http://blog.t-lea.net/#post192 : "Some Words on the Standard Model" "The Standard Model by Wikipedia: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Standard_Mode...

Hi and welcome to the forum, creativesoul!

"Actuality does not care how you feel about it." by creativesoul

I'll object just for the fun of it and say that "actuality may care how you feel about it insofar as it is represented by people who care for you!"

Cheers!

You about that! What does "You about that!" actually mean? I know you're not a native English speaker but your writing style is often difficult to understand. You're a sensible man, John. I just mean that those views are definitely his and they enter his record of writing. Nothing more th...

It's just gibberish. There is no fore-telling. I take it that you go directly against the both of these two doctors (PhDs)! You about that! Well, what I hoped to achieve by the synonyms or two concepts divided by the slash mark ("/") was to keep people in line with the written information...

Under "Quantum Physics, Psychology and Foreseeing", I've written further on Entanglement/Telepathy and thus it relates here, by http://blog.t-lea.net/#post194 : There's some discussion on the ability of "foreseeing"/"telling accurately what the future holds" and in this...

Thanks, Izzywizzy, for your kind words! But you are still in debt to show us how superior you are! Besides, this thread really relates to this: The billowing "millions" of mentally ill people by diagnosis, but mentally healthy in the functional respects (that is, there is no unifying guide...

I agree with "Megalomania, god complex" and "Erotomania(?), obsessive love, Münchausen by Proxy, self mutilation(?), sadism, machochism(?)"! Well done, HexHammer! Now, which of the two categories do they go into? And how do they relate to in the spectrum of these 2 categories? Fo...

I'm posting this in a new post so that people are given a clearer chance to follow what is going on. Good? This has first been published on my blogs. I'm not sure if you're interested, but I've declared "The Standard Model of Elementary Particles May Now Be Complete!" The foundation follow...

Thanks, HexHammer! This is actually almost the same that I added to my webpage, http://t-lea.net/somatists.html , going at it for 5-6 years now, a good while ago: "Telepathy can be very inexact and it can be troubling to discern it all. With telepathy, you may want to investigate " quantum...

I take this to heart immediately, ...but it's an industry full of fraudsters. !!! I have no wish to approve of idiots and I have no wish to "create" a false science or a science that not strictly adheres to the HDM qualifying method!!! My only point is that telepathy is under serious evalu...

I'll try to locate it even! Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:29 pm Post subject: Re: is telepathy possible? Hi I would like to defend the position that Telepathy exists. Especially, this is an answer to I_blame_blame. First, the existence of telepathy in science is based on particle physics, namely quant...

Thanks a lot again, chaz wyman!