Search found 629 matches
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:28 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQM
- Replies: 248
- Views: 5822
Re: LGBTQM
Well, so do readers then. They will see a reasonable response and attempt at discussion and your abject avoidance of the same. So good job. Idiosyncratically, you “win” in your own mind, but every reader sees that at the basest level of resistance you fold like a paper tiger. Oh no. 'The readers' m...
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:24 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQ Should be prioritised as adoptive parents.
- Replies: 26
- Views: 6021
Re: LGBTQ Should be prioritised as adoptive parents.
“Cis” is not offensive. It literally just means a person that agrees with their birth designation. As for the rest of your statement, it doesn’t make sense. Either we can refer to women as a subgroup of humans or we cannot. I think it makes sense that we can. WTF? Who are you to say that 'cis' isn'...
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:20 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQM
- Replies: 248
- Views: 5822
Re: LGBTQM
I know everything I need to know. There's no point in further engagment and I'm certainly not your 'bro'. Well, so do readers then. They will see a reasonable response and attempt at discussion and your abject avoidance of the same. So good job. Idiosyncratically, you “win” in your own mind, but ev...
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:18 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQ Should be prioritised as adoptive parents.
- Replies: 26
- Views: 6021
Re: LGBTQ Should be prioritised as adoptive parents.
[ Women are not a subgroup of themselves. Take your offensive 'cis' and shove it. “Cis” is not offensive. It literally just means a person that agrees with their birth designation. As for the rest of your statement, it doesn’t make sense. Either we can refer to women as a subgroup of humans or we c...
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:15 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Dear wokeroaches
- Replies: 18
- Views: 449
Re: Dear wokeroaches
Now this is from a funny X account. It's full of stuff like this. Hilarious. Post it on here and all the humourless, self-important wokeroaches will clutch their pearls in horror.
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:10 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQM
- Replies: 248
- Views: 5822
Re: LGBTQM
I know everything I need to know. There's no point in further engagment and I'm certainly not your 'bro'.
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:09 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Dear wokeroaches
- Replies: 18
- Views: 449
Re: Dear wokeroaches
No wonder she left. The people on here are beyond pathetic. You don't even get a laugh on here.
- Sun May 26, 2024 8:02 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQM
- Replies: 248
- Views: 5822
Re: LGBTQM
Yep. Definitely a narcissist. A highly educated idiot. They are all over the place
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:55 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Dear wokeroaches
- Replies: 18
- Views: 449
Re: Dear wokeroaches
Just as well I'm not 'veg' then
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:53 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Dear wokeroaches
- Replies: 18
- Views: 449
Re: Dear wokeroaches
Fuck off.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2024 7:48 amOh no, dementia is terrible especially when you forget who you are.
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:51 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQM
- Replies: 248
- Views: 5822
Re: LGBTQM
Under thirties are hands down the most narcissitic generation the world has even seen (the only one in fact). They seem to spend their entire existence divided between virtue-signalling over non-causes, having tantrums when others don't play their little games and use language that they demand they ...
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:42 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Dear wokeroaches
- Replies: 18
- Views: 449
Re: Dear wokeroaches
''Men who support women's right to things that also benefit men (abortion, contraception, sex work) but dismiss as trivial nonsense issues that benefit only women (women-only spaces, lesbian dating sites, maternal health, women's sport) are telling you clearly who they are.'' J K Rowling She could ...
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:40 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQ Should be prioritised as adoptive parents.
- Replies: 26
- Views: 6021
Re: LGBTQ Should be prioritised as adoptive parents.
Q is for queer. Gender isn’t so straightforward and there are plenty of people that don’t fall into binary categories. The blasé dismissal of this fact comes more from ignorance than anything, as the rest of this thread demonstrates. She's back!! (correct pronoun?) Glad to see you back AstroCat - I...
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:37 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQM
- Replies: 248
- Views: 5822
Re: LGBTQM
Blah blah blah I'm not reading that. You lost me at 'non binary' and 'gender'. Piss off. Then your earnestness (or lack thereof) in intellectual discourse is revealed. Big shrug from me, readers will see. It's not worth reading. All you are doing is writing meaningless buzzwords and phrases. What a...
- Sun May 26, 2024 7:36 am
- Forum: Gender Philosophy
- Topic: LGBTQM
- Replies: 248
- Views: 5822
Re: LGBTQM
And no one gives a flying rat's arse if you are a lesbian or not. What does it have to do with anything? And what's 'tribal' about standing up for women's rights? 'Hate term'. FFS. Americans. We have them to thank for fucking up the human race. I declared my preference because it’s related to the s...