Search found 621 matches
- Wed May 05, 2021 1:24 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Psycopathy of Muhammad(anism) and Nazism
- Replies: 28
- Views: 4822
Re: Psycopathy of Muhammad(anism) and Nazism
I even gave you the definition. And whinging is exaclty what you are dooing Hence I clarified: whining is "exaclty" (sic) what you are "dooing" (sic). Boohoo. I attack one whinger. You attack half the human race. It's you that looks ridiculous. To all others - Sculptor can/will ...
- Wed May 05, 2021 12:58 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Psycopathy of Muhammad(anism) and Nazism
- Replies: 28
- Views: 4822
Re: Psycopathy of Muhammad(anism) and Nazism
FFS Stop WHINGING! I think you mean to accuse me of "whining" because that is precisely what you are doing. It's not a personal attack. You're stating the opposite of what is true. It is a personal attack(s) as that is all you can do. It's what you are saying that is incoherent. If that i...
- Wed May 05, 2021 10:58 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
- Replies: 40
- Views: 6105
Re: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
That’s correct. And since you cannot know what you think you know, you can only believe what you think you know. Yes you can - you can know you merely think and/or believe something(s) while consciously knowing you truly know not . Knowing one knows not is a valid knowledge. In fact, it is the most...
- Wed May 05, 2021 10:28 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Proof of Nothing
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4059
Re: Proof of Nothing
To place nothing as part of a two sided coin, ie one side, is to equate nothing to something thus it is no longer nothing. Dually I stated nothing can neither be proven or disproven. To prove nothing is to prove nothing thus an absence of proof exists as nothing cannot be proven. To disprove nothin...
- Wed May 05, 2021 10:14 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: 2=1!
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3469
Re: 2=1!
1 line divided by a zero dimensional point results in two lines. 0 is a process of halving thus an manifestation of multiplicity of parts. In reality, there is no such thing as a "point", let alone a "zero dimensional point". Mathematicians use "points" as devices beca...
- Wed May 05, 2021 10:00 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Psycopathy of Muhammad(anism) and Nazism
- Replies: 28
- Views: 4822
Re: Psycopathy of Muhammad(anism) and Nazism
It is almost always the case that when an argument emplys the absolute "everything", it is undersminung anything useful that it might have to offer. Your opening statement is stupid, and plain wrong. "everything" is a big word. Hyperbole makes you look like a whinging child. I d...
- Wed May 05, 2021 1:21 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
- Replies: 40
- Views: 6105
Re: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
All knowledge negates all belief-based ignorance(s) ad infinitum . Yes, all knowledge negates all belief-based ignorances by replacing them with belief-based truisms. You can only "believe" in something if you don't actually know it. Confusing belief for knowledge is like confusing darkne...
- Wed May 05, 2021 12:59 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Proof of Nothing
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4059
Re: Proof of Nothing
To place nothing as part of a two sided coin, ie one side, is to equate nothing to something thus it is no longer nothing. Dually I stated nothing can neither be proven or disproven. To prove nothing is to prove nothing thus an absence of proof exists as nothing cannot be proven. To disprove nothin...
- Sun May 02, 2021 2:43 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Proof of Nothing
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4059
Re: Proof of Nothing
... I disagree that we cannot infer an absolute nothing. But it has to be at the absolute level of "Totality" (not merely our empirical universe). I argue that if we are to be appropriately fair to reasoning, we cannot assume that an Absolute Infinite and continuous whole would 'exist' [o...
- Sun May 02, 2021 1:49 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: 2=1!
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3469
Re: 2=1!
I think we should define different zero as we define different infinity. The problem solved. The problem one will encounter if/when doing this is they will no longer be describing anything in the real, physical universe. That is fine if the purposes for doing the same are for another system, but it...
- Sun May 02, 2021 1:42 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
- Replies: 40
- Views: 6105
Re: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
Hey, it's someone typing as if they're teaching something . . . about a topic they're completely ignorant about. That's a new one on a message board. Not. You're accusing others of what you are yourself guilty of. It's a very good thing it's not the way you "think" it ought to be. One nee...
- Sat May 01, 2021 1:35 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
- Replies: 40
- Views: 6105
Re: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
nothing, this post is for you. It’s just one more attempt to help you understand what nearly everyone else understands. If "nearly everyone" understood the difference between knowledge and belief, the "believer vs. unbeliever" division could/would not exist. This division exists...
- Sat May 01, 2021 12:28 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
- Replies: 40
- Views: 6105
Re: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
(Propositional) knowledge being justified true belief is a standard philosophical view going all the way back to Plato at least. So there's nothing "new age" about it. It's a view that goes back almost 2500 years, and that has persisted until the present. In fact, it's one of the least co...
- Fri Apr 30, 2021 5:57 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
- Replies: 40
- Views: 6105
Re: Evil as Belief-Based Inversion
Actually it is commonly used in this way. Yes, because it is commonly misunderstood/abused in that way. Knoweldge is a "justified true belief". Belief is not knowledge. You can only "believe" something if you don't know. Just because you beleive in a thing does not necessarily m...
- Fri Apr 30, 2021 4:57 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Proof of Nothing
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4059
Re: Proof of Nothing
Any/all considerations of "nothing" in isolation is errant, as "nothing" is but one side of a two-sided coin . Just as the presence of yang is required for the presence of yin (by way of contrast ), "something" is required for any/all considerations of "nothing&quo...