Philosophy Now Forum

The above is the reason is why I have been advising Age to consult a psychiatrist. I wrote: Now this will EXPOSE the ones who are OPEN from those who are CLOSED. The above is a PRIME EXAMPLE of a completely AND utterly CLOSED person. So, I have achieved what I set out to achieve, and EXPOSE what I ...

I stated there are 100s of verses which directly implicate 'disbelief' [KFR: Kufr] and 3400++ verses in the Quran's 6236 verses as a threat to the Muslim's faith and the religion of Islam. I produced a few of the above verses as examples but no matter whatever context you read them the implication ...

I stated there are 100s of verses which directly implicate 'disbelief' [KFR: Kufr] and 3400++ verses in the Quran's 6236 verses as a threat to the Muslim's faith and the religion of Islam. I produced a few of the above verses as examples but no matter whatever context you read them the implication ...

This seems like you wanted to just say "God is the absoluteness, it is the absolute property of everything. This god is both logical because this god exists and has great justification towards it's existence, and it is also illogical because it just doesn't make any sense." but decided tha...

Killing non-believers or non-muslims is NOT an evil nor violent act at all. Now this will EXPOSE the ones who are OPEN from those who are CLOSED. Well it's definitely a violent act? Not necessarily so. It certainly is NOT in context of Allah and islam. It is though. Violence is "Behaviour invo...

But you never supported it properly, making your premise based entirely on Ibn Kathir. You need to provide the verses instead of saying "Ibn Kathir says 'fasadan' includes disbelief." There is no specific verse that stated 'disbelief' is a fasadan [threats to Muslims and Islam]. However i...

I do not think you even understand what i'm saying. Most of the verses you mention are not really about the main problem in your argument, and "fitnah" isn't properly defined in that verse. In other words, your argument basically amount to this: 1) Premise: Muslims* should do good deeds f...

I do not think you even understand what i'm saying. Most of the verses you mention are not really about the main problem in your argument, and "fitnah" isn't properly defined in that verse. In other words, your argument basically amount to this: 1) Premise: Muslims should do good deeds fro...

I'm not one of those fool enough to subscribe to groupism. If someone does harm to another, I only blame the individual that did such harm. I mean I'm sure they might belong to many groups, such that if a man does harm to another, I'm not going to blame all men. Neither will I blame all diabetics i...

Because the functions of Personhood are grounded in the essential nature of humanness, and because human beings are persons that maintain identity through time from the moment they come into existence at conception, it follows that the unborn are human persons of great worth because they possess th...

I arrived at that conclusion based on the context of the ethos of the whole Quran. Problem is I did not compile them for ready presentation. So I will have to search for them, if you are familiar with the Quran, you will understand this is not easy. Here are the verses in context - this is a rough ...

Please just do not randomly select a bunch of verses and paste them together though: Context and the wording is important. When it comes to the Quran, that is usually overlooked by Muslims -who just select the most far fetched explanation or just follow the traditional one- and non-Muslims.

"can't it be the case that you not choosing to eat the spinach is because of your predisposition too?" Oh, I'm absolutely predisposed to hate spinach. I've had no bad experiences with the stuff to color my view (except for tryin' it voluntarily). As I see it: spinach is garbage food. But:...

Problem is you are not educating your brain/mind. And your problem is hasty generalization. If you remove Islam and terrorist attacks remain unchanged the evidence will speaks for itself. The rest is you trying to rationalize your position. I am speaking based on objective facts. I have provided yo...

“So, being able to not act in accordance with your desires is evidence for free will in your opinion. I get where you're coming from.” Well, that not what I said at all. The spinach choosing was an example, not a definition. and the example was about ignoring, by choice, predisposition (which isn’t...