Yes at last a thread title I can agree with.
Yes they are not just illusory they are pure invention!!
Search found 8645 matches
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 7:44 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
- Replies: 22
- Views: 306
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:43 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 201
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:42 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 201
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:45 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God is...
- Replies: 58
- Views: 730
Re: God is...
Using mathematics as a tool in science does not give the assurance of certainty that the mathematical proof of God [Godel] is real. Gödel mapped the claim onto five other claims and has done this in a mathematically unobjectionable manner. That is all there is to it. It just means that from now on ...
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:37 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God is...
- Replies: 58
- Views: 730
Re: God is...
Dog is god This is a no brainer. DOG. Is mysterious, but has over millenia tended towards GOD. Domesticated over 25,000 years ago, debate remains if the dogwolf domesticated us rather than we them.. Old English docga , a late, rare word, used in at least one Middle English source in reference specif...
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:34 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
- Replies: 10
- Views: 151
Re: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
The whole thing colapses with the first axiom.
Axiom 1: If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive.
Axiom 1: If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive.
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:32 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
- Replies: 10
- Views: 151
Re: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
I can answer this in one word.
The soundness of Godel's argument....
ZERO
The soundness of Godel's argument....
ZERO
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:50 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 201
Re: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
I heard that Buddha almost quit trying before becoming a lifetime teacher. He obviously didn't quit junk food. Fatty.jpeg Back then being fat was a sign of oppulence. ANd since there was no such things as junk food, you could be healthy and fat at the same time. Obvously he was not great at running...
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:40 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 201
Re: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
Was diagnosed with diabetes 4 years ago, but rather than start taking medication I looked ways to reverse the disease. The doctor simply did not know it was possible, but I had heard tales. Long story short I completely reversed my diabetic state simply by trawling YouTube. Recently I wanted to sha...
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:49 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: What could make morality objective?
- Replies: 9903
- Views: 1060016
Re: What could make morality objective?
Perhaps here's one form of the fallacy behind some forms of anti-realism: Each of us constructs reality 'in the mind', based on sense data. Therefore, reality is nothing more than each person's mental construct based on sense data. If it is, then the empiricist skepticism - and ultimately solipsism...
- Tue Apr 16, 2024 10:19 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: the name for our age...
- Replies: 15
- Views: 229
Re: the name for our age...
Sisyphus has been around long before Homer first penned the myth in the Odyssey. And he has always been used one way or another in every age. I see no particular reason why this is more relevant to "Our Age" than to any other, probably less. Ages are nominated usually when they are comple...
- Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:53 pm
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: What is tolerance?
- Replies: 159
- Views: 1960
Re: What is tolerance?
Now lets talk about Trumps indictments, or are you going to persist with the fiction that they are all made up nonsense??? :D :D :D https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictments_against_Donald_Trump Huh? I don't think Trump's indictments are nonsense (although the New York case currently being tried se...
- Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:44 pm
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: [b][i]Morality is objective[/i][/b] is not even wrong. It is a statement without any meaning what ever.
- Replies: 19
- Views: 292
Re: [b][i]Morality is objective[/i][/b] is not even wrong. It is a statement without any meaning what ever.
*** Let us set the record straight on this idiotc question that keeps coming up "Is moraltiy sujective or objective", " "what would it take?" etc.. The whole problem seem to be a mischaracterisation of what the subject/object argument is all about. Things are not objective ...
- Tue Apr 16, 2024 1:34 pm
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: [b][i]Morality is objective[/i][/b] is not even wrong. It is a statement without any meaning what ever.
- Replies: 19
- Views: 292
Re: [b][i]Morality is objective[/i][/b] is not even wrong. It is a statement without any meaning what ever.
I have no idea why you should care. Great. I'll save myself the effort then. I have long found it is not worth my time to bother with Skeptic. He loses concenration after reading a few words then get angry and talks bollocks, As you can see Will, all he does is troll and the take a series of dumps ...
- Tue Apr 16, 2024 10:51 am
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: [b][i]Morality is objective[/i][/b] is not even wrong. It is a statement without any meaning what ever.
- Replies: 19
- Views: 292
[b][i]Morality is objective[/i][/b] is not even wrong. It is a statement without any meaning what ever.
*** Let us set the record straight on this idiotc question that keeps coming up "Is moraltiy sujective or objective", " "what would it take?" etc.. The whole problem seem to be a mischaracterisation of what the subject/object argument is all about. Things are not objective o...