Search found 8651 matches
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:40 pm
- Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
- Topic: Dopson's Paradox
- Replies: 32
- Views: 4503
Re: Dopson's Paradox
THis is called the "Liars; paradox " THis PARADOX does not bear your name, you camera shy dope. I have to say that your YouTube effort is the worst I have ever seen. It's like watching paint dry. I could not watch more than a few seconds witing for you to gather what few thoughts were tryi...
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 8:22 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
- Replies: 27
- Views: 362
Re: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
You seriously underestimate the consequences of Godel's incompleteness theorems. Furthermore, Godel did not invent them. He painstakingly discovered them. Godel and Einstein were close friends during their time at Princeton. It is still not clear who will eventually turn out to be the most influent...
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 2:20 pm
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: How to be a Moral Realist
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1175
Re: How to be a Moral Realist
The levels of your self-delusions are breathtaking. You keep digging yourself deeper and deeper, not seemingly capable of joining up the dots. To be fair, the paper he is referencing is not only very very disimilar to anyting VA argues, but it is also far too clever and technical for VA to even und...
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:13 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: How to be a Moral Realist
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1175
Re: How to be a Moral Realist
It is a tragic shame that you cannot apply this insight to your posts on "objective morality", since you seem to be using the "geometric method" to impose your own will upon the moral landscape yet can have not objective justification for doing so. Don't be too hasty. I am not w...
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 11:12 am
- Forum: Ethical Theory
- Topic: How to be a Moral Realist
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1175
Re: How to be a Moral Realist
And still you avoid the issues.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Mon Jun 29, 2020 4:50 amYour usual counter is that 'nervous laugh' 'lol' blah, blah, blah, because you fear the truth.
- Fri Apr 19, 2024 10:40 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
- Replies: 27
- Views: 362
Re: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
Yes at last a thread title I can agree with. Yes they are not just illusory they are pure invention!! You seriously underestimate the consequences of Godel's incompleteness theorems. Furthermore, Godel did not invent them. He painstakingly discovered them. Godel and Einstein were close friends duri...
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 7:44 pm
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
- Replies: 27
- Views: 362
Re: Heaven and hell are not just "illusory"
Yes at last a thread title I can agree with.
Yes they are not just illusory they are pure invention!!
Yes they are not just illusory they are pure invention!!
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:43 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 209
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 1:42 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 209
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:45 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God is...
- Replies: 62
- Views: 791
Re: God is...
Using mathematics as a tool in science does not give the assurance of certainty that the mathematical proof of God [Godel] is real. Gödel mapped the claim onto five other claims and has done this in a mathematically unobjectionable manner. That is all there is to it. It just means that from now on ...
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:37 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: God is...
- Replies: 62
- Views: 791
Re: God is...
Dog is god This is a no brainer. DOG. Is mysterious, but has over millenia tended towards GOD. Domesticated over 25,000 years ago, debate remains if the dogwolf domesticated us rather than we them.. Old English docga , a late, rare word, used in at least one Middle English source in reference specif...
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:34 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
- Replies: 24
- Views: 331
Re: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
The whole thing colapses with the first axiom.
Axiom 1: If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive.
Axiom 1: If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive.
- Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:32 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Religion
- Topic: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
- Replies: 24
- Views: 331
Re: The Soundness [???] of Godel's Argument for God
I can answer this in one word.
The soundness of Godel's argument....
ZERO
The soundness of Godel's argument....
ZERO
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:50 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 209
Re: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
I heard that Buddha almost quit trying before becoming a lifetime teacher. He obviously didn't quit junk food. Fatty.jpeg Back then being fat was a sign of oppulence. ANd since there was no such things as junk food, you could be healthy and fat at the same time. Obvously he was not great at running...
- Wed Apr 17, 2024 5:40 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
- Replies: 13
- Views: 209
Re: Thinking for others, is dangerous..
Was diagnosed with diabetes 4 years ago, but rather than start taking medication I looked ways to reverse the disease. The doctor simply did not know it was possible, but I had heard tales. Long story short I completely reversed my diabetic state simply by trawling YouTube. Recently I wanted to sha...