Philosophy Now Forum

Are you going to invent this language from scratch, or are you going to extend English to meet your needs?

Why doesn't English meet your needs presently?

Any sufficiently technically competent person can easily reverse-engineer the correct x86 emulation of this source-code by H(P,P) without knowing anything else besides this source-code and that H emulates its input with an x86 emulator. That you cannot do this conclusively proves that you are not a...

Ah so you simply "do not believe in" x86 assembly language. Strawman. Assembly is source code. C is source code. Show me a complete memory dump of your system. Starting at address 000011a2 Give me all the details so that I can reproduce the experiment on my own hardware (in case you are lying to us).

I only glanced at your words for a half second to realize that you are still denying the dead obvious verified facts. That only speaks to your inability to process feedback and correct your work. There are no facts in your work - only bullshit. I am denying the validity of your methodology and dism...

By reverse engineering what the behavior of the input to H(P,P) would be if we assume that H performs a pure x86 emulation of its input for the first emulation and the first nested emulation. The x86 source-code of P specifies everything that we need to know to do this. _P() [00001352](01) 55 push ...

-1^2=55/55 https://i.postimg.cc/Wb2j0y3N/face-with-tears-of-joy-1f602.png Hey! Is this you? truth is always relative to a particular model. it's a property that varies depending on the model of the axioms. There are simply different models of number systems in which statements that are true in one ...

It doesn't take any of these things for a C function to analyze the x86 machine language trace of another C function. Pete, you are a fucking bullshitter. How have you obtained the "x86 execution trace" of a C program which doesn't compile to an x86 executable? #include <stdint.h> #define u32 uint3...

A=A equivocates to an infinite variety of things therefore is subject to equivocation. This infinite variety of things can be expressed as: 1. (A=A), (B=B), (C=C),... 2. (A=B), (A=C), (A=D),... (where B,C,D... are variations of A.) Congratulations. You have re-invented types/propositions. Everythin...

mutually exclusive fact claims can be simultaneously true if you are just willing to make that the entire point of your new logic and forget everythiong else. What a colourful wordsalad that was. Which part of "no privileged descriptions" is going over your head exactly? There is no such thing as "...

It does not have to be source-code. In only has to specify the actual behavior of the actual input. 👆👆👆 This right here is why you don't understand the issue. You can't specify the "actual behavior" of a self-modifying program at compile-time , because a self-modifying program changes its own "actu...

You prove that you don't have a clue in this post: Pure functions? What the heck are those ?!?! Q.E.D Your decider keeps being wrong. Every. Damn. Time. If you decide to stop being an idiot maybe you'll spot the difference between applying the function "max" to parameters "1 2 3 4 5" - which return...

I give up. You are incompetent on this subject. Your competence decider is as broken as your halting decider. You are still oblivious to the fact that the definition of P (in the form of plain-text source code) is not being passed as an input to H! Learn about quoting, and self-evaluating forms dum...

It need not be text. Definition of "source code". a text listing of commands to be compiled or assembled into an executable computer program. Another definition a computer program written in text form that must be translated into another form, such as machine code, before it can run on a computer W...

You simply do not have enough sufficiently relevant technical background to correctly review my work. This work has already been very extensively reviewed with thousands of reviews and none of the reviews brought up the issue that you raised about source-code versus x86 machine language. Pete. Your...

It does not have to be source-code. In only has to specify the actual behavior of the actual input. Can you fucking read? For any program H that might determine if programs halt, a "pathological" program P, called with some input, can pass its own source and its input to H and then specifically do ...