Search found 2866 matches

by TimeSeeker
Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:35 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

You are just like the "other", human being, here. So are you. You both state that you KNOW some thing, but when asked to provide an example of what "it" is, you both FAIL TREMENDOUSLY in providing any at all. Have you looked in the mirror recently? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Do you know when (date and...
by TimeSeeker
Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:17 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

Age wrote:
Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:15 am
ALSO, what are you SO CERTAIN that I am actually lying about exactly?
If you had Universal Knowledge - surely you would know the answer to this question?

What is with the superfluous questions?
by TimeSeeker
Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:11 am
Forum: Gender Philosophy
Topic: The Insidious Power of Pronoun Discrimination
Replies: 161
Views: 1041

Re: The Insidious Power of Pronoun Discrimination

Superfluous use of 'self'. It makes you look like a wanker. Ignorant criticism. Individuation is a thought-process - you can aim it at anything you so desire. You can individuate the atoms in a molecule. You can individuate self from society. Also. I am a wanker. I am not one to turn a blind eye to...
by TimeSeeker
Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:08 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

So, some times you insist that you have NO knowledge, that there is NO absolute certain knowledge, and that you are NOT 100% CERTAIN of any thing, but then AT OTHER TIMES you say that you actually do have knowledge, and more than others, and that you are also 100% ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN of some things....
by TimeSeeker
Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:05 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

I don't think Age is liar in the premeditated and intentional sense, i.e. knowing the truth and deliberately twist the truth and state something else. Age is merely ignorant of the 'zombie parasites' in his brain are compelling him to BELIEVE in something that is irrational ultimate 'X' to be real,...
by TimeSeeker
Sun Dec 02, 2018 7:58 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Quantum computing, is this the start of AI intelligence?
Replies: 23
Views: 182

Re: Quantum computing, is this the start of AI intelligence?

Your thinking is stuck with the present. I am discussing possibilities in the future extrapolated from the present facts. OK sunshine. I am the one currently working on building this stuff - so I am well aware of the theoretical and practical limits ;) Extrapolation from 'present facts' is irreleva...
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 6:22 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Double Slit Experiment
Replies: 49
Views: 455

Re: Double Slit Experiment

Using wave functions to describe complexity is convenient. But that does not give you the correct picture of reality. Quite the contrary, you get the wrong image. That is what I call ignorance, it is not ignorance as in "I don't WANT to understand", but the ignorance as in: "I HAVE to ignore realit...
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 4:33 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

We have already gone over the answer, THAT I HAVE ALREADY GIVEN, many times already. You even admitted that you were somewhat perplexed and confused by my answer of "No". Also, did you want the date and time, relative to what and who? And, What does 'tsunami' mean to you? How do you define 'tsunami...
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 4:19 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

Age wrote:
Sat Dec 01, 2018 4:19 pm
Do you want me to respond to YOUR posts that I have already responded but you have edited also?
No. Only to the question.

Do you know when (date and time) and where (location) on Earth will the next tsunami take place?
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 4:18 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

But what gave you the IDEA that I do have the answer to this question? You said you experience only one event. You said you don't experience time like humans do. You said you don't experience 'future' like humans do. You said you know things that humans don't. For the readers: observe how he is dod...
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 4:08 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

But what gave you the IDEA that I do have the answer to this question? You said you experience only one event (leading me to BELIEVE that you don't experience past and future) You said you don't experience time like humans do (confirming my suspicion) You said you don't experience 'future' like hum...
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:57 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Relativistically 1 is not a Constant
Replies: 6
Views: 121

Re: Relativistically 1 is not a Constant

If you are a relativist - there is no such thing as 1 or 0. There are things approximate to 1 and approximate to 0. But both are unattainable. All floating point arithmetic is subject to range-precision trade-off: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic And all relativism is floating...
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:54 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

You already know what will happen. You have knowledge of the future. I don't. YES, we have gone through that already. Then I don't understand why you are asking me a question to which you already know the answer. I don't know what will happen - YOU DO! Similarly, I don't have the answer to this que...
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:23 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical
Replies: 222
Views: 1366

Re: Supporting Evidences and References are Critical

Age wrote:
Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:22 pm
But if I just answer, then what WILL happen?

If you just answer this question; then ....
You already know what will happen. You have knowledge of the future. I don't.
by TimeSeeker
Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:09 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Statements are inherently meaningless.
Replies: 18
Views: 188

Re: Statements are inherently meaningless.

I don't think you understand how science works. I think I do. Perhaps your conception of science is mistaken? I don't think you know how to make coffee. From growing the plants to brewing the drink. I have a pretty good idea. But I am happy with my coffee machine too. I don't think you understand t...