Philosophy Now Forum

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon May 27, 2024 10:04 pm Fuck off and get banned.

you, really, hate having your views and/or beliefs challenged. And, you, really, detest even more when you are shown and proved to be Wrong, contradictory, and/or hypocritical here.

FFS popeye - The ultimate science we have is physics - IT is the measure that GIVES any "meaning" to these "all things"/ Biology is the 3rd tier (after chemistry) Your conclusion that absent of conciousness the world (*lets state the universe*) is utterly meaningless requires yo...

You miss my point, that you have circled back to what the context Harbal in his OP has asked without actually providing an answer. Sure, conscious minds are required to quiz the "meaning of life" - but you still haven't answered that question. This is why I don't start many threads: I ask...

You miss the point, that there is meaning only to biological life and biological consciousness, there are no disciplines that are not dependent upon the meanings biology provides. Again biology is the measures and the meanings of all things. Subjectively you are the center of your universe and you ...

Biology is the measure and the meaning of all things. In the absence of a biological, read-conscious subject, the world is utterly meaningless. FFS popeye - The ultimate science we have is physics - IT is the measure that GIVES any "meaning" to these "all things"/ Biology is the...

Then so is my question. You do not wish to discuss meaning in general? No. I'm just a bit fed up with being told that if I don't believe in God, life/existence must have no meaning for me. Well I just wanted to know what meaning it has when you believe in God. Were you also told that "santa cl...

What part of 'you are on ignore' do you not understand you stupid old fart? The irony here. you, obviously, must of read it, to reply to it. So, either the ignore function is not functioning, or, you just cannot help "yourself". Either way your presumptions we notice, still, continue. The...

The silly old demented fool doesn't seem to have heard of 'age of consent' laws, and because HE, at 80, has decided that a young adult of 16 is a 'child', then apparently the law is a 'paedophile'. Yeah and I hear ya, 3/4 of the problem is that people still talk to this ** , now Harbal does (like u...

you already provided it LIAR . Where is this EVIDENCE that I am sexually attracted to prepubescent children? The silly old demented fool doesn't seem to have heard of 'age of consent' laws, and because HE, at 80, has decided that a young adult of 16 is a 'child', then apparently the law is a 'paedo...

Not necessarily, Age. A child is a young person IMO. All children are also young persons. And not all persons are children (in the sense of being "underage" in legal terms, though all persons might be 'children' of a parent--to clarify). You've assumed I meant something that I did not. Wh...

By "some children" do you mean young persons (children) between age 16-18? How does one rationally and logically arrive at the definition of a 'young person' is 16-18 years of age? To do so would obviously imply that those younger than 16 are not even persons. Which is just beyond all sen...

Age, it doesn't sound to me like Atto endorses or is endorsing pedophilia. As far as I can discern, it sounds like he is very much opposed to it. "attofishpi" not just approves but even actually endorses and promotes the "british law" that adult human beings of any age are permi...

Where I'm from a sixteen year old is legally allowed to make their own decision on who they have sex with (over sixteen) and yes, that could be with an 80 year old if they were so inclined. Then, wherever you are from that is one very sick society. From where 'we' are from we do not allow the abuse...

Er, Age - all children are younger than 80. Once more you have completely and utterly missed what I meant . So, I made it more clearer. I am not saying it is perfectly ok for an ADULT to have sex with a 16 year old. In fact most British people frown up ADULTS partaking in what is legally ok in Brit...

AGAIN FOR THE Nth TIME:- Where is your EVIDENCE that I am a PEDOPHILE? you already provided it LIAR . Where is this EVIDENCE that I am sexually attracted to prepubescent children? I never said you were. As can be clearly seen and proved in the actual words that I have said, written, and used above ...