Philosophy Now Forum

Luxin wrote: ↑Sat May 02, 2020 7:36 amA

Why are you deleting your posts, 'now'?

I agree with your ideas. My suggestion is that one simply makes positive changes, and then they will discover the real Truth, which will demonstrate and explain why holding onto incorrect interpretations, such as the one above, has delayed humans from reaching the truth for generations cookie click...

If anyone believes in 'objective moral truths', then why do they not just write down what the 'objective moral truths' are, exactly? If 'objective moral truths' exist, then writing down the list of them would be a very simple and easy task, right? Belief is not required to objectively consider a to...

But no one has to be of the so-called 'caliber' of "godel" to know that what you are trying to claim here is just the stuff of pure insanity. “The thing about smart people is that they seem like crazy people to dumb people.” ― Stephen Hawking Is that why "stephen hawking" appear...

Now, if you want to keep claiming that "godel's" work aligns with some claim that there is a 'multiverse' and not a 'Universe' and/or that "godel's" work will prove that God exists, then by all means keep claiming this. Godel's work is mathematical. So, it is not about the physi...

It is not possible to prove anything about the physical universe. If this is what you believe is true, then so be it. That is not merely a personal belief. It is the standard position in the epistemology of science. Once again, here 'we' have another who uses the, 'it is the standard position', as ...

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/will-the-universe-ever-stop-expanding1/ From your link, which by the way provides absolutely nothing that could remotely be used as actual prove of an expanding Universe, what is first noticed is that the 'presumption' that the Universe is expanding is bel...

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/will-the-universe-ever-stop-expanding1/ From your link, which by the way provides absolutely nothing that could remotely be used as actual prove of an expanding Universe, what is first noticed is that the 'presumption' that the Universe is expanding is bel...

I feel your pain. Next time please ask complex questions. Simple ones throw me for a loop. This has become very obvious. Well now you know. Complexify , bro! Then we can make solid progress. But, to me, absolutely every thing in Life is simple and easy. So, I cannot so-call 'complexify' what is Tru...

I don't imagine the average person makes the objective/subjective distinction. But, as the saying goes, "The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation." -- Thoreau. They don't think much, at least about the basis for their beliefs...they're too busy just trying to live. But we're philos...

That's what most people seem to do...to say they disbelieve in objective moral truths, and that morality is all subjective, but then act as if their own beliefs are mostly objectively true anyway. 8) I don't imagine the average person makes the objective/subjective distinction. But, as the saying g...

Even so, I think I will follow my whims, just in case they turn out to be objectively true. 🙂 That's what most people seem to do...to say they disbelieve in objective moral truths, and that morality is all subjective, but then act as if their own beliefs are mostly objectively true anyway. 8) I don...

If He's fictitious, it doesn't matter what you follow. There's no obligation to follow anything...not even your own whims. Even so, I think I will follow my whims, just in case they turn out to be objectively true. 🙂 That's what most people seem to do...to say they disbelieve in objective moral tru...

Ironic. That's exactly why I don't bother with you...you're just never rational, it seems. That's rich coming from someone who believes the Bible is literal truth. :? Well, we're going to see about that. This is your only 'argument' here. 'We are going to see about that'. The only, real, come back ...

No one can make you reasonable. Ironic. That's exactly why I don't bother with you...you're just never rational, it seems. Coming from the one who tries to argue, from its very own, very obviously very 'subjective' views, that it is a so-called "objectivist" you seem to have missed the tr...