Search found 1996 matches

by Age
Mon Jun 10, 2019 8:54 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 108
Views: 1307

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

You have a great ability of twisting things around, and then actually believing in your own distorted thinking. Once again, you have completely missed the mark. I guess you are terrible at drawing the mark. But I would be lying if I said I am interested in engaging you further. As to the accuracy o...
by Age
Mon Jun 10, 2019 8:48 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 108
Views: 1307

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

Do you know you keep having to explain "What X is" BEFORE you can explain "How X behaves"? No. I am not doing that. But if you have somehow understood what X is from the indecipherable string of characters I offered, I guess it's clear you are easy to please. Therefore, the question "What is X?" is...
by Age
Mon Jun 10, 2019 8:05 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 108
Views: 1307

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

By the way, considering your logic you could only go on for 26 times before you would circle back again anyway. You don't know how to invent new symbols beyond the ones you were given? What is Z? ▲ What is ▲? ⍌ What is ⍌ ? 字 What is 字 ? Щ What is Щ ? 🤮 Also, did you know you can combine symbols to ...
by Age
Mon Jun 10, 2019 5:54 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 108
Views: 1307

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

Yes you did. You just explained "What X is", FIRST. You said, Let X be "knowledge". So, knowing "What X is", FIRST, can be far more useful then knowing "How X behaves". So let X = knowledge is an explanation? So that is how philosophy works! What is X? Knowledge. What is Knowledge? P. What is P? Q....
by Age
Sun Jun 09, 2019 11:57 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 108
Views: 1307

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

So you have just illustrated why knowing "What is X?" FIRST is more useful than knowing "What X does". I haven't done any such thing? Yes you did. You just explained "What X is", FIRST. You said, Let X be "knowledge". So, knowing "What X is", FIRST, can be far more useful then knowing "How X behave...
by Age
Sat Jun 08, 2019 4:19 am
Forum: Ethical Theory
Topic: How can we defeat "us vs. them" mentality?
Replies: 7
Views: 118

Re: How can we defeat "us vs. them" mentality?

Very simply just do not have a "us" verse "them" attitude. Truthfully there is NO "them" existing anyway.
by Age
Sat Jun 08, 2019 3:58 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 108
Views: 1307

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

To me, I recognise that you would have to be able to at least answer the question "What is X?" first. Without first knowing "What X is" what use is there in knowing "What X does?" OK. Let X be "knowledge". Okay. So you have just illustrated why knowing "What is X?" FIRST is more useful than knowing...
by Age
Fri Jun 07, 2019 8:24 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 108
Views: 1307

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

So I pose a question to all which deem themselves wise philosophers: Do you recognize that the question "How does X behave?" is infinitely more useful than the question "What is X?" No. To me, I recognise that you would have to be able to at least answer the question "What is X?" first. Without fir...
by Age
Thu May 30, 2019 12:59 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Rights and Equality and Love
Replies: 2
Views: 62

Re: Rights and Equality and Love

Impenitent wrote:
Wed May 29, 2019 10:24 pm
there is no universal ethical standard

-Imp
Is this the truth?

Is there no universal ethical standard, or, is there no universal ethical standard that you know of?
by Age
Thu May 30, 2019 12:39 am
Forum: Political Philosophy
Topic: What ideal and work can *save the world*?
Replies: 25
Views: 396

Re: What ideal and work can *save the world*?

Now you are getting even further away from what I was saying. I'm actually on point, the root cause are your lack of knowledge and low IQ! Do you remember that it was i that wrote something, to which you replied to? If yes, then do you also recall that it was i that said your reply does not have mu...
by Age
Tue May 28, 2019 12:20 pm
Forum: Political Philosophy
Topic: What ideal and work can *save the world*?
Replies: 25
Views: 396

Re: What ideal and work can *save the world*?

Yes, failed coup-conspirators should be prosecuted, however, how close to the source should the lance drain and can the layers of obfuscation even be pierced? Can these predictions come true, or given the reality-bending properties of propaganda as evidenced by the media’s shocked surprise at Trump...
by Age
Tue May 28, 2019 7:12 am
Forum: Political Philosophy
Topic: What ideal and work can *save the world*?
Replies: 25
Views: 396

Re: What ideal and work can *save the world*?

There is many of you, but only one I. What will start to make life better for every one is when you adults start accepting and taking responsibility for the wrong that you all do. Quite simply when you seriously want to change for the better, be open and honest, then the "world" starts becoming a m...
by Age
Mon May 27, 2019 1:10 am
Forum: Political Philosophy
Topic: What ideal and work can *save the world*?
Replies: 25
Views: 396

Re: What ideal and work can *save the world*?

There is many of you, but only one I. What will start to make life better for every one is when you adults start accepting and taking responsibility for the wrong that you all do. Quite simply when you seriously want to change for the better, be open and honest, then the "world" starts becoming a mu...
by Age
Fri May 24, 2019 1:46 am
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: Would you like to live your life again ?
Replies: 13
Views: 231

Re: Would you like to live your life again ?

Yes, EXACTLY.
by Age
Wed May 22, 2019 12:05 am
Forum: Philosophy of Science
Topic: Einstein on the train
Replies: 775
Views: 8511

Re: Einstein on the train

Also you say in the second premise / statement that IF someone CAN demonstrate that square circles DO ACTUALLY EXIST then you WILL ACCEPT THAT . But this does NOT show nor explain HOW nor WHY you WILL THEREFORE be listening and accepting . WHAT IS the exact moment WHERE you CHANGED from NOT listeni...