Philosophy Now Forum

Where is my post about rage and lust, and Harvey Weinstein? How many of my threads have been silently destroyed?

It's difficult to separate love from beauty. To be bound through genuine favoring, is to love what is beautiful. Yet, to move in the sphere of what is one's own, is to love. Ergo, the most ugly and excessively vicious child is a mother's own, and so is often the thing loved.

It is interesting to speak of a useless trait. However, is it useless? I'm not sure Epiphenominalism can not mean something else, i.e., that the awareness and the physical state are two sides of the same coin. Ergo, the movement of the atoms, and the agent, are the same thing, we are the determinati...

People blame Trolls for their difficulties, but what does harm is the human. When Trolls stir the cauldron of human confusion, and gather all the apathetic materials of their blanched bloodless hearts into a conflagration which licks the inside of their foul beings with the dark malignity of Tartaru...

To, perhaps, assume that one must think with all newness and sharpness everything one thinks, each time it is thought, including what is herein experienced as thinking in this sentence. Only then will the perpetual pons asinorum swim in his erudition as what is indistinguishable from the view over t...

“If that is true then there should exist a dynamical theory which time is an emergent phenomena within it.” Say you define time by using a ruler and a machine. The ruler measures points on a surface, and the machine tells you each time an atom lets off a quantum of radiation during its decay. Time ...

“We still don't have a theory with time as an emergent property. I think that such a theory cannot exist. I am discussing this in another thread.” If time means the same thing as space, as in space/time, and we understand the so-called 'heat event' (the raw data from which various theories such as ...

You amuse yourself, but no one else.

"Nice."

So, you advocate strict thought control?

How is it that you know what is not available to him? The concept of substance as it is used with regard to the Eucharist is not arcane, what is mysterious is the change of substance. Is this a courtroom game, like: “Is it impossible that he knows?” With the ploy that either way one must make a con...

I've been more often scolded by the force of the gigantic popularity of the reverse claim, which crashes against the shore and shatters into pieces like a wave over the mediocre masses of humanity. That philosophy is elitist, practiced largely by elites historically, and that the ordinary hard-hande...

Theory of BB does not claim to be a theory which explain the creation of time. It does in the sense of space-time, which is the only sense the claim of "Big Bang" deals with. And even if it didn’t the point would be the same in principle. “There is no time reference at which timeless God ...

I will not answer, seeing as it is beneath a troll's dignity, a troll, and that means: one who utterly despises the essential mediocrity which is in the smell of the wretched human present in each vulgar human word humans tap out on their computer keyboards.

This argument "cannot create at a specific moment" is empty since it speaks against what happens. One cannot put an arbitrary rule, non-contradiction, above what happens. Instead one should measure the rule by what is. Note, I appreciate the sense, out of nothing, i.e., where there is no t...

DIALOGUE OF THE TROLLS (Or, on the region of Questioning as the annihilation of the Human Being) Participants of the Dialogue Troll Troll Stranger, who is called Stranio Troll. I see you are in the orange clogs of a stranger; here we sport exclusively green clogs. My dear troll, from where do you ha...