Philosophy Now Forum

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:20 am

commonsense wrote: ↑

Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:04 am

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 02, 2020 10:19 pm

Yes. If the article is true. What is true doesn't change depending on who its author is.

How do you know if it’s true?

Which part of it are you disputing, and why?

I don’t dispute any of it. I just don’t know if it’s true.

Just because evidence is 'circumstantial' doesn't make it wrong, or any less compelling. Circumstantial evidence is less credible than physical evidence. In this case it's the only possible 'kind' of evidence because obviously no one physically witnessed the actual transference of the virus from on...

Then you shouldn't assume things. Watch the video. And why? Is there some part of the article that is wrong? What difference does it make? It's just a site where writers can post articles as far as I can tell. Should I believe a schizophrenic just because he writes an article? Yes. If the article i...

You obviously didn't watch the video, because it has nothing to do with the article. This is exactly what I mean. If something is true then what difference does it make who's delivering the message, or on what forum? You are 'checking' to see if it fits with your political agenda. Fuck people. I do...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAk7aX5hksU&t=1117s “Donald Trump calls it the “Chinese virus” – to widespread fury. China has expelled prominent American journalists and launched a disinformation campaign that accuses the American army of starting it. Taiwan has accused the World Health Organisati...

Just because evidence is 'circumstantial' doesn't make it wrong, or any less compelling. Circumstantial evidence is less credible than physical evidence. In this case it's the only possible 'kind' of evidence because obviously no one physically witnessed the actual transference of the virus from on...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAk7aX5hksU&t=1117s “Donald Trump calls it the “Chinese virus” – to widespread fury. China has expelled prominent American journalists and launched a disinformation campaign that accuses the American army of starting it. Taiwan has accused the World Health Organisati...

Just because evidence is 'circumstantial' doesn't make it wrong, or any less compelling. Circumstantial evidence is less credible than physical evidence. In this case it's the only possible 'kind' of evidence because obviously no one physically witnessed the actual transference of the virus from on...

Do you have any insight into your projection? Wake up! I am speaking of projection, the pathological action of falsely attributing to others what is true of yourself. What you claim to be true about Arising_uk can honestly be said by A_uk about you. You seem to be unaware of this tendency, even tho...

Your responses are wasted on me, they are just meaningless words heard as blah blah blah. To be honest, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about ever, so I don't know why you even bother responding to me. If I could just grasp what ever it is you are trying to say to me then I guess we ...

I believe the "evil right wing" are winning because the evil left wing are relatively MORE evil. There are always extremists on each side [natural re Bell Curve], the issue is which evil is more evil than the other. In effective decision making, one will calculate the weighted-average from a long l...

Your responses are wasted on me, they are just meaningless words heard as blah blah blah. To be honest, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about ever, so I don't know why you even bother responding to me. If I could just grasp what ever it is you are trying to say to me then I guess we ...

Why do evil right wing fascists always win elections - if not now, then in the near future? .... No wonder why fascism persists even to this day. But I do wonder, why is Fascism so popular? I believe the "evil right wing" are winning because the evil left wing are relatively MORE evil. There are al...

None. The ones answering in the U.S. conducted surveys we must assume were also the ones electing Hitler in the first place. And one must also assume that the people who voted for Hitler in 1930 are also the same people who said National Socialism was a good idea, badly implemented in 1946. You are...

Several polls were made in the years 1946-1960 showing that Hitler enjoyed support from 50+ % of the German population. None of the polls show that. Some of the polls support "A majority in the years 1945–49 stated National Socialism to have been a good idea but badly applied". That is agreement wi...