## Search found 6828 matches

Wed Apr 14, 2021 1:54 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: P = -P
Replies: 33
Views: 855

### Re: P = -P

x through x is x existing as x. Not "through." "X qua x"--"x 'as x itself'" In other words, not an impression of x or anything else like that. X itself. Saying "x" itself is not the same as "x" qua "x". One shows one x the other two x's. "x" qua "x" shows multiple "x's" and with multiple "x's" show...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:35 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: P = -P
Replies: 33
Views: 855

### Re: P = -P

Seriously, what the frig are you talking about? You couldn't be more confused. False, x qua x is x through x. Holy crap you haven't the foggiest idea. If you cannot provide a proper counter-argument without resorting to ad hominums then you are projecting. Qua: "in the capacity of; as being." x thr...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:24 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: P = -P
Replies: 33
Views: 855

### Re: P = -P

x qua x is the repetition of x as x repeats. Seriously, what the frig are you talking about? You couldn't be more confused. False, x qua x is x through x. It shows one x as multiplying with this multiplication being the sameness of identity. x cannot be the same as x unless there is multiple x's. x...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:18 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: P = -P
Replies: 33
Views: 855

### Re: P = -P

What's being pointed to isn't an--or "the"--act of observation. Where in the world are you getting such a nonsensical idea from? That which is pointed to is that which imprints. If I point to "x" then "x" imprints itself upon me. This imprintation is acceptance, acceptance is assuming, assuming is ...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:47 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: P = -P
Replies: 33
Views: 855

### Re: P = -P

Both pointing and what is being pointed to is the act of observation. What's being pointed to isn't an--or "the"--act of observation. Where in the world are you getting such a nonsensical idea from? That which is pointed to is that which imprints. If I point to "x" then "x" imprints itself upon me....
Tue Apr 13, 2021 9:10 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Change as Mirroring of Nothing
Replies: 0
Views: 31

### Change as Mirroring of Nothing

Change is the repetition of a phenomenon if it mirrors nothing. Take for example a line. The line exists as one. However if a zero dimensional point is introduced it divides the line. The line mirroring the zero dimensional point introduced results in another line. The mirroring of nothing results i...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 9:09 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Infinity as Change
Replies: 185
Views: 2428

### Re: Infinity as Change

"Change is a variation of the original source where the source exists through its continual change. For example the number 1 on the number line observes 1 existing through new forms, as new numbers, which are composed of 1. As composed of 1 they are variations of one. Change is the preservation of ...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 6:13 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Infinity as Change
Replies: 185
Views: 2428

### Re: Infinity as Change

"It is the continual repetition of a phenomenon which makes it infinite." A phenomenon cannot be infinite as it is subject to change. The underlying substance, if not subject to change, is infinite. The number one as an idea changes in the sense of describing different phenomenon, therefore it is n...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 6:11 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Infinity as Change
Replies: 185
Views: 2428

### Re: Infinity as Change

But you said, " 'to accept' is 'to assume' ". Which means you could accept/assume ABSOLUTELY ANY thing as being "what is present as existing", like, for example, accepting/assuming that the earth, presently as existing, is flat or at the absolute center of the Universe, and that this means that you...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 6:08 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: P = -P
Replies: 33
Views: 855

### Re: P = -P

In other words if you're talking about the act of referencing, you're not even addressing my comments, because that is NOT what I'm talking about. Then what are you even talking about, do you even know? As I wrote, now divided up into two convenient parts: (1) Not the act of referencing, (2) but wh...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 12:11 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: P = -P
Replies: 33
Views: 855

### Re: P = -P

" NOT the act of referencing." No. And again: The act of referencing is pointing, to point is to observe, thus the act of referencing is the act of observation. In other words if you're talking about the act of referencing, you're not even addressing my comments, because that is NOT what I'm talkin...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 12:10 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Infinity as Change
Replies: 185
Views: 2428

### Re: Infinity as Change

Are you saying that whatever you assume is true then this means that you are open? Accepting what is present as existing is openness. But you said, " 'to accept' is 'to assume' ". Which means you could accept/assume ABSOLUTELY ANY thing as being "what is present as existing", like, for example, acc...
Tue Apr 13, 2021 12:08 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Infinity as Change
Replies: 185
Views: 2428

### Re: Infinity as Change

Advocate wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:31 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:20 am Accepting what is present as existing is openness.
Acceptance is of two kinds, usually confused, which do you mean, acknowledgement or capitulation?
Acknowledgment is accepting terms of condition.
Wed Apr 07, 2021 3:20 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Infinity as Change
Replies: 185
Views: 2428

### Re: Infinity as Change

But 'to assume' infers to be CLOSED, and to NOT be OPEN. To be Truly OPEN is to NOT 'assume', NOR 'believe, ANY thing. To be open is to accept what is in front of them, to accept is to assume. Are you saying that whatever you assume is true then this means that you are open? Accepting what is prese...
Wed Apr 07, 2021 1:17 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Infinity as Change
Replies: 185
Views: 2428

### Re: Infinity as Change

Very true, but LOL obviously one would NOT KNOW, until they ask. Also, if one was Truly OPEN, and Truly curious enough, then ONLY THEN that one could and would KNOW. And what does it mean to be open other than to assume what is in front of them? But 'to assume' infers to be CLOSED, and to NOT be OP...