Philosophy Now Forum

It seems to me that most of what we say if full of unproven assumptions. The sentence I have just written does not assume anything because of the introduction unit "it seems to me". The second sentence I have just written does not assume anything either, because it is purely analytical. Or do you s...

There is a mantra in the field of scientific inquiry: If you ask a stupid question - you will get a stupid answer. I am of the opinion that all ontological questions in the form of "What is X?" are stupid questions. We live in a dynamic universe. Change is the only constant is colloquial wisdom. Ti...

[/color]4 user_id=17231] Efficiency is subject to to many variables that make it inefficient...hence a paradox. Computational complexity is only subject to three. Space, time and randomness. It's in the very abstract I quoted. False considering Time can be observed strictly as a variation of space ...

If I misunderstand you...it is my choice under game theory. That's all you needed to say. If you choose to misunderstand. I choose to ignore you. I am pointing out a contradiction in game theory as game theory, when subject to its own parameters, is self-negating. Understanding does not have to be ...

1. Obtain a temporary e-mail address at https://www.guerrillamail.com 2. Edit your profile and update your e-mail address to the temporary one above. 3. Follow activation instructions in the message received at https://www.guerrillamail.com 4. Generate random password at https://passwordsgenerator....

You are doing ineffective witchcraft. None of your work is even vaguely adjacent to science. Science is witchcraft in the modern sense as it is strictly just transmuting phenomena into other useless phenomena. Now tell me what science is exactly? What I am arguing is "definition"...nothing else...I...

BWHAHAHAHA!...I saw dousing in the first few words and realized I just roped you into a long winded argument...noone really cares about. ... Well only pedants of the English language, so it's "dowsing" you loon not "dousing" as if it was the latter you'd be playing with a hosepipe which to be hones...

I tried to engage with him [Logik] to see where he was coming from.. but I couldn't find anything. "...And there was an old man, who lived in the greenwoods, and nobody knew him, or what he had done, but mothers would say to their children, beware of mad John..." Atla said in this thread that he ha...

1. Obtain a temporary e-mail address at https://www.guerrillamail.com 2. Edit your profile and update your e-mail address to the temporary one above. 3. Follow activation instructions in the message received at https://www.guerrillamail.com 4. Generate random password at https://passwordsgenerator....

https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/philos.pdf One might think that, once we know something is computable, how efficiently it can be computed is a practical question with little further philosophical importance. In this essay, I offer a detailed case that one would be wrong. In particular, I argue...

You have no objective standard for what constitutes "science" thus your base axiom of what is or is not scientific is subject to your own subjective belief. Yeah, I do. Luck/entropy is the objective standard. principle of maximum entropy . The more I practice - the luckier I get. Obviously, there's...

You have no objective standard for what constitutes "science" You are doing ineffective witchcraft. None of your work is even vaguely adjacent to science. Science is witchcraft in the modern sense as it is strictly just transmuting phenomena into other useless phenomena. Now tell me what science is...

No the truth is you just repeat the same bullshit about the dousing rods...when I argued for the millionth time that they are "a" testing parameter not "the" testing parameter. You argue this strictly being you have no other intellectual cards to play and this is the best you can do...and it is bor...

Arising_uk wrote: ↑

Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:39 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote:...
And with that being said...you can go back to screwing yourself.

And once again your monomania gets the better of you.

Monad as Triad...get it right.

What he represents is pure evil egocentric, however his genius is to be respected and commended. People hate him because he makes everyone look stupid...and the truth is the majority of people here are. That's one way to mis-understand my position. You draw no distinction between egocentrism and ra...