Philosophy Now Forum

False, I am following my own premises where everything is an assertion. Your premises do not allow that thus contradict themselves on their own terms. Space and time are measurably discrete units. Discrete units implies discretion. Definite assertions can (only) be definitely true or definitely fal...

How can I be projecting my own personal viewpoint by stating "image", "form" and "likeness" are synonyms? The argument presented is a statement of definition as to how "image", "form" and "likeness" relate. The point being made was that you can't see your own hypocrisy: you accused me of making ass...

Again assertions with no argument. Image, likeness and form are synonyms. You follow with the assertions: Image, likeness and form are synonyms. The accuser is the accused. How can I be projecting my own personal viewpoint by stating "image", "form" and "likeness" are synonyms? The argument present...

This is an assertion, not an argument. The letters used to type your response are forms. I'm not here to argue about such things, as there is no point - it is embedded in your psyche along with many other things I care not to address. Yes you are. You cannot sever from reality without creating a ne...

False, reality as composed of forms, and symbols acting as forms... Reality is not composed of forms/symbols acting as forms. This is an assertion, not an argument. The letters used to type your response are forms. Reality as beginning and ending is a statement of relation...It becomes it's new who...

Both therefore proposition one is true and as true necessitates symbols as real phenomenon in themselves. Not both: reality precedes symbols, not the other way around. False, reality as composed of forms, and symbols acting as forms which mediate to further forms, necessitates the symbol as occurin...

From the common and conventional perspective, yes, what constitutes a scientific fact lies outside the scientific method. However, I presumed you are familiar with the Modern Physics of Einstein and Quantum Mechanics where the scientific facts and its referent CANNOT be independent of the Scientifi...

Yes it is, your equation relative to Pi and Phi, is a series of symbols which represent a series of relations. It defines reality. Symbols define reality? Or reality defines symbols? Both therefore proposition one is true and as true necessitates symbols as real phenomenon in themselves. One must b...

The continual change, as the diverging of one category into another, necessitates a finite number approaching infinity. This finite number is always changing through a regress to infinity, ie infinite regress, considering the change itself is unending. Infinite, never ending change, results in an i...

Reality is defined through symbols... Reality is not defined through symbols. Yes it is, your equation relative to Pi and Phi, is a series of symbols which represent a series of relations. It defines reality. ...as the equations you offer are composed of symbols... The equations/symbols are not of ...

There is no question of " what constitutes what an actual fact is cannot be tested." Note Wittgenstein's " Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. " (Tractatus 7) As such, whenever 'that what ' is raised in your mind, you should just remain silent, i.e. 'shut up' on that question. So ...

The continual change, as the diverging of one category into another, necessitates a finite number approaching infinity. This finite number is always changing through a regress to infinity, ie infinite regress, considering the change itself is unending. Infinite, never ending change, results in an in...

But if reality is defined through a symbol... ...and it is not . Reality is defined through symbols as the equations you offer are composed of symbols, the equations are not real in themselves (according to you) except as definitions of phenomena which are occuring. 4/√Φ is a series of symbols thus...

The formal proof in such a formal system would simply be the sequential steps of the membership algorithm. // Simplest possible formal system having a single axiom. // (implemented as a membership algorithm) void main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if (argc != 2) printf("Input a finite string such as: \...

All phenomena result from void voiding itself into form, with form voiding itself into many forms. Logically this sequence is a result of the Principle Explosion, where from contradiction anything results, empirically this sequence is a result of the Big Bang, where from nothingness everything resul...