Search found 6020 matches

by Eodnhoj7
Tue Jul 07, 2020 4:59 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

False, I am following my own premises where everything is an assertion. Your premises do not allow that thus contradict themselves on their own terms. Space and time are measurably discrete units. Discrete units implies discretion. Definite assertions can (only) be definitely true or definitely fal...
by Eodnhoj7
Mon Jul 06, 2020 5:29 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

How can I be projecting my own personal viewpoint by stating "image", "form" and "likeness" are synonyms? The argument presented is a statement of definition as to how "image", "form" and "likeness" relate. The point being made was that you can't see your own hypocrisy: you accused me of making ass...
by Eodnhoj7
Sun Jul 05, 2020 6:59 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

Again assertions with no argument. Image, likeness and form are synonyms. You follow with the assertions: Image, likeness and form are synonyms. The accuser is the accused. How can I be projecting my own personal viewpoint by stating "image", "form" and "likeness" are synonyms? The argument present...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat Jul 04, 2020 5:11 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

This is an assertion, not an argument. The letters used to type your response are forms. I'm not here to argue about such things, as there is no point - it is embedded in your psyche along with many other things I care not to address. Yes you are. You cannot sever from reality without creating a ne...
by Eodnhoj7
Fri Jul 03, 2020 4:42 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

False, reality as composed of forms, and symbols acting as forms... Reality is not composed of forms/symbols acting as forms. This is an assertion, not an argument. The letters used to type your response are forms. Reality as beginning and ending is a statement of relation...It becomes it's new who...
by Eodnhoj7
Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:13 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

Both therefore proposition one is true and as true necessitates symbols as real phenomenon in themselves. Not both: reality precedes symbols, not the other way around. False, reality as composed of forms, and symbols acting as forms which mediate to further forms, necessitates the symbol as occurin...
by Eodnhoj7
Thu Jul 02, 2020 4:48 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: Suspicion, Proof and Fact
Replies: 16
Views: 506

Re: Suspicion, Proof and Fact

From the common and conventional perspective, yes, what constitutes a scientific fact lies outside the scientific method. However, I presumed you are familiar with the Modern Physics of Einstein and Quantum Mechanics where the scientific facts and its referent CANNOT be independent of the Scientifi...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:14 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

Yes it is, your equation relative to Pi and Phi, is a series of symbols which represent a series of relations. It defines reality. Symbols define reality? Or reality defines symbols? Both therefore proposition one is true and as true necessitates symbols as real phenomenon in themselves. One must b...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:00 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Infinite Regress and Finiteness
Replies: 4
Views: 80

Re: Infinite Regress and Finiteness

The continual change, as the diverging of one category into another, necessitates a finite number approaching infinity. This finite number is always changing through a regress to infinity, ie infinite regress, considering the change itself is unending. Infinite, never ending change, results in an i...
by Eodnhoj7
Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:09 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

Reality is defined through symbols... Reality is not defined through symbols. Yes it is, your equation relative to Pi and Phi, is a series of symbols which represent a series of relations. It defines reality. ...as the equations you offer are composed of symbols... The equations/symbols are not of ...
by Eodnhoj7
Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:01 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: Suspicion, Proof and Fact
Replies: 16
Views: 506

Re: Suspicion, Proof and Fact

There is no question of " what constitutes what an actual fact is cannot be tested." Note Wittgenstein's " Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. " (Tractatus 7) As such, whenever 'that what ' is raised in your mind, you should just remain silent, i.e. 'shut up' on that question. So ...
by Eodnhoj7
Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:09 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Infinite Regress and Finiteness
Replies: 4
Views: 80

Infinite Regress and Finiteness

The continual change, as the diverging of one category into another, necessitates a finite number approaching infinity. This finite number is always changing through a regress to infinity, ie infinite regress, considering the change itself is unending. Infinite, never ending change, results in an in...
by Eodnhoj7
Mon Jun 29, 2020 5:19 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 87
Views: 18928

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

But if reality is defined through a symbol... ...and it is not . Reality is defined through symbols as the equations you offer are composed of symbols, the equations are not real in themselves (according to you) except as definitions of phenomena which are occuring. 4/√Φ is a series of symbols thus...
by Eodnhoj7
Mon Jun 29, 2020 5:12 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V15
Replies: 14
Views: 177

Re: Simply defining Gödel Incompleteness and Tarski Undefinability away V15

The formal proof in such a formal system would simply be the sequential steps of the membership algorithm. // Simplest possible formal system having a single axiom. // (implemented as a membership algorithm) void main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if (argc != 2) printf("Input a finite string such as: \...
by Eodnhoj7
Mon Jun 29, 2020 5:05 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Principle of Explosion Sequence
Replies: 0
Views: 26

Principle of Explosion Sequence

All phenomena result from void voiding itself into form, with form voiding itself into many forms. Logically this sequence is a result of the Principle Explosion, where from contradiction anything results, empirically this sequence is a result of the Big Bang, where from nothingness everything resul...