Philosophy Now Forum

Did ANY one CLAIM that the 'concept of separation' was NOT a part of the 'one'? Does it matter? We might NOT KNOW UNTIL you ANSWER the QUESTION. If the concept of seperation was part of the one then the concept of multiplicity is part of the one as well. So what? And, does 'this' matter? Under thes...

BECAUSE absolutely EVERY 'thing' could agree. 'We' again WAIT. Okay. 1. That fact that everything "could" agree only points to the potential of agreement. NO it DOES NOT. you REALLY DO LOOK AT and SEE 'things' FROM the VERY NARROWEST and SMALLEST of perspectives sometimes "eodnhoj7&q...

9. To create a distinction requires a distinction between further distinctions thus one distinction leads to another with an inevitable ambiguity as to why there is a distinction to begin with and why there are distinctions to begin with. Distinction is thus spontaneous in nature as what we are left...

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 4:06 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 05, 2023 3:31 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sat Jul 01, 2023 8:14 am

'We' WAIT, UNTIL you ANSWER the ACTUAL QUESTION posed, and ASKED.

The questions are answers.

TO WHO, EXACTLY?

It is relative thus your question can have no distinct answer.

But I have NEVER said NOR stated that 'things' are one. So, WHY SAY and STATE what you did here? So if things are not one then there is multiplicity? Do you COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND the ACTUAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN the words 'thing' AND 'things'? If yes, then what IS the ACTUAL DIFFERENCE? And to wha...

the way the education system works, is that we are taught that the various disciplines are distinct and separate... but they are not... history and economics and psychology and math and astronomy are all the same subject... we arbitrarily separate them...into categories.... take a look at animals.....

I do not understand your question here. Then you are not one with me and if you are not one with me you cannot state everything is one. BUT I can state WHATEVER I like and want to. WHY do you BELIEVE that I can NOT? And 'you' being 'one' with "another" does NOT even make logical sense any...

Are you even aware of what the 'everything' word means and refers to, exactly? If yes, then what does the 'everything' word mean and refer to, exactly? Why would you conclude that a 'thing' might not be a 'thing'? What does the 'it' word here refer to, exactly? 1. The word "everything" is...

YES I AM ABSOLUTELY SURE. Is 'what' the right question, to ask, and WHERE and in regard to 'what', EXACTLY? But you are NEVER wrong in what you STATE, right? 1. And how do you know you are sure? BECAUSE absolutely EVERY 'thing' could agree. 2. Are you sure that is the right question? 'We' again WAI...

But here, 'you are right, and we are wrong' correct "eodhnoj7"? So, to you, is the unity of the football team, for example, not made up of the distinct players within the team but rather by just one 'thing: alone, right? 'Everything', for one word. Really? If yes, then WHY, EXACTLY? 1. If...

Wrong AGAIN. The words that are stated under the label "eodnhoj7" here can be and are being very easily differentiated from the words stated under the label "age" here. Then if you can differentiate then things are not one as the differentiation necessitates difference and with ...

2. Beyond comparison and beyond form makes existence no-thing (not a thing) as a thing requires definition. Beyond comparison and beyond form makes existence all things, not no-thing. Remember existence is not a thing in this sense. Existence is all things. Existence is the entirety. Existence is b...

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:10 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:04 pm

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:03 pm
Wrong again, what’s your point?

Now you are doing the same thing you accuse me of...repeating.

Wrong again. What’s your point.

Why does there have to be a point?

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:10 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:05 pm

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:03 pm
Wrong again, what’s your point.

That is your subjective state (if meaning is subjective according to you).

There is 'just is-ness'.

Wrong again. What’s your point.

Why does there have to be a point?

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:10 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:06 pm

Darkneos wrote: ↑Fri Jun 30, 2023 8:04 pm
Wrong again, what’s your point?

There is 'just is-ness'.

Wrong again. What’s your point.

Why does there have to be a point?