Search found 5880 matches

by Eodnhoj7
Mon May 25, 2020 9:24 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: Is It Possible To Think Without Language?
Replies: 704
Views: 52999

Re: Is It Possible To Think Without Language?

Language is the manifestation of symbols. Each symbol acts as a median towards another phenomena. Each phenomena acts as a median towards another phenomena as well, therefore each phenomena is symbolic in nature. Language is inseperable from reality as reality is a series of symbols. This is under t...
by Eodnhoj7
Mon May 25, 2020 9:18 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Religion
Topic: God
Replies: 0
Views: 41

God

With the absence of one God comes a replacement by another God. For example if God is replaced in a belief system by a humanist interpretation, man becomes the God. God is an overarching term as a apex of power and control. The phenomenon which people believe represents the totality or summation of ...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat May 23, 2020 4:06 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Doubling and Halving Necessitate all Phenomenon as Dynamic
Replies: 0
Views: 51

Doubling and Halving Necessitate all Phenomenon as Dynamic

The doubling of positives results in a negative as a form of gradation occurs. For example the "reddest red" necessitates there being grades of red where one red is less than another, a deficiency in red occurs. The doubling of negatives results in a positive as a negation of negation occurs. For ex...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed May 20, 2020 3:04 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: Truth/Falsity as a False Dichotomy
Replies: 6
Views: 11669

Re: Truth/Falsity as a False Dichotomy

The truth/false dichotomy is a false dichotomy given the expression of contexts reflect truth values to have multiple grades of meaning. All contexts are derive a truth/false value given the contexts through which they are presented. For example "a unicorn exists" maintains a simultaneous true and ...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat May 16, 2020 5:55 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Movement, Particles and Lines
Replies: 0
Views: 51

Movement, Particles and Lines

1. A particle moves from point A to point B. 2. This movement of the particle is the inversion from one position to another position. 3. The inversion from one position to another is the replication of the particle across space. 4. All movement is the manifestation of fractions/fractals of the dista...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat May 16, 2020 12:55 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong
Replies: 30
Views: 518

Re: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong

1. Existence is dependent upon context. Something may exist in one context but not another. In the universal ontological context, if something exists - then it exists. If there is a context in which ontological entities cease to exist, the context is bullshit. A unicorn fails to exist as an empiric...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat May 16, 2020 12:51 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong
Replies: 30
Views: 518

Re: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong

Neutrality as both true and false. And what about the 4th possibility? neither true nor false. 1. True 2. False 3. True and False 4. Neither True or False 5. Neutrality as both "positive" and "negative", positive as "both/and", negative as "neither/nor" still necessitates a third state of "neutral ...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat May 16, 2020 12:42 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong
Replies: 30
Views: 518

Re: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong

What's the middle term between Truth and Falsity? Neutrality as both true and false. For example the proposition "Unicorns exist" is true under the context of "dream" and false under the context "empirical". It is both true and false. To exist always carries the implied context of reality. To opera...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat May 16, 2020 12:04 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong
Replies: 30
Views: 518

Re: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong

Skepdick wrote:
Sat May 16, 2020 12:01 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Fri May 15, 2020 4:49 pm
Its triadic as there is always a middle term.
What's the middle term between Truth and Falsity?
Neutrality as both true and false.

For example the proposition "Unicorns exist" is true under the context of "dream" and false under the context "empirical". It is both true and false.
by Eodnhoj7
Fri May 15, 2020 5:54 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Expression and Definition
Replies: 1
Views: 95

Expression and Definition

All expression is inherently empty in itself. What gives definition to expression is its progress from one term into a new one. This progression allows for a relation of parts which enables a greater clarity. Each term is effectively renewed through a new one. Each word is defined through the contex...
by Eodnhoj7
Fri May 15, 2020 4:49 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong
Replies: 30
Views: 518

Re: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong

False, one can both know and not know truth. The notion of "Falsity" too is a subject to Meno's paradox. "The argument known as “Meno's Paradox” can be reformulated as follows: If you know what you're looking for, inquiry is unnecessary. If you don't know what you're looking for, inquiry is impossi...
by Eodnhoj7
Fri May 15, 2020 12:10 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong
Replies: 30
Views: 518

Re: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong

If that is a truth then you contradict yourself. Sounds like you already know what "truth" is. That's Meno's paradox. And a violation of the trillema. False, one can both know and not know truth. As assumed truth is evident as is. As regressive not all truth is evident as subject to regress. As cir...
by Eodnhoj7
Thu May 14, 2020 7:27 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong
Replies: 30
Views: 518

Re: Science Is All Lies: Prove me wrong

Skepdick wrote:
Thu May 14, 2020 4:38 pm
The biggest lie ever told is that Truth exists and that it should be sought.

Convincing people to seek truth, is a bit like playing hide-and-seek with a puppy.

It's a game in which the seeker is not in control.
If that is a truth then you contradict yourself.
by Eodnhoj7
Thu May 14, 2020 7:12 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: The Unavoidability of Belief within Reason
Replies: 170
Views: 27425

Re: The Unavoidability of Belief within Reason

All phenomenon break down to point particles. No they do not. There are no actual particles, only motion. I've stated several times there are no "points" in nature but you seem to make a point to ignore this fact. Movement requires the change of one particle from one position to another. This movem...
by Eodnhoj7
Thu May 14, 2020 6:10 pm
Forum: Epistemology - Theory of Knowledge
Topic: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses
Replies: 36
Views: 18103

Re: 'Knowledge' and 'Belief' as Primordial Antitheses

Words are defined by their usage. Meaning is use. Words are no more defined by their usage than musical notes are defined by theirs: definition may only applies to limit(s). s/t = 1 = light (without displacement) s/t ≠ 1 = displacement (particular matters) Any/all s/t phenomena is defined by its pa...