Search found 3532 matches

by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:13 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Are Assumptions Proof?
Replies: 1
Views: 8

Are Assumptions Proof?

Discuss.
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:09 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory
Replies: 174
Views: 3148

Re: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory

You are palpably very concerned to be taken seriously, it's why you try so very very hard to look so clever. Everyone can smell your desperation, you reek of status anxiety. Dowsing rods are not, and never have been, a technology for measuring anything at all, other than the gullibility of the fool...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:05 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity
Replies: 25
Views: 474

Re: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity

Scott Mayers wrote:
Sat Jun 08, 2019 7:29 pm
If this is an appeal to philosophers, shouldn't you first define "Computational Complexity" at least?
He cannot without eventually contradicting himself given it's probabilistic interpretation.
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:02 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory
Replies: 174
Views: 3148

Re: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory

Actually probability theory necessitates all things as possible because of its scientific nature. Correct. Right now most scientists consider faster-than-light travel to be impossible. But there is non-zero probability that they are all wrong. When you demonstrate how to travel faster than light - ...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:58 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity
Replies: 25
Views: 474

Re: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity

Actually direction is relative by nature considering all intervals are directional by nature considering they measure the measurement of a phenomena away/towards a baseline measurement. Don't be a silly dualist now. When you are speaking about 'intervals' you are talking about magnitudes. Scalar qu...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:45 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory
Replies: 174
Views: 3148

Re: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory

And I already told you ages ago that those "frameworks" with their "proofs" can be used to "prove" mutually exclusive claims, rendering them entirely worthless. Astrology is as capable of proving anything as any other of your voodoo frameworks is. Your entire body of evidence depends on instrumenta...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:39 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory
Replies: 174
Views: 3148

Re: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory

I don't care if I am taken seriously or not, these are "interpretations" and those "tools" you keep referencing are strictly group agreed interpretations. They are also the kind of 'interpretations' which meet this criterion: Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improb...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:35 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity
Replies: 25
Views: 474

Re: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity

Really, then maybe you should read more considering time is relative and I Can read a book upside down and backwards at the same time... No. Really. I am trying. Reverse character order. Reverse word order. It's bullshit. "space. with left are we Thus itself. space of approximation an to conducive ...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:21 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory
Replies: 174
Views: 3148

Re: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory

I don't need to argue with you about the impossible details at the boundaries of science. You are just trying to use a transparent maneuver to save face after making a tremendous fool of yourself. Let's just remind ourselves that one of your big ideas was that pyramids can be used to repair mental ...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:16 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory
Replies: 174
Views: 3148

Re: Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory

ROFL!!! You did it again...you said something about "pedants"...and I was like: ROFL!!!! Lol! Well one thing is being proved, If you don't wear your tin-foil hat your pyramid scrambles your brain. Congratulations....I just read that whole sentence. Should have worn my tin-foil hat first though.
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:16 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 136
Views: 1674

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

Prove why falsifiability is correct...and why it is "not" the munchausseen trillema which negates your premise axiom of "computing" as the foundation for your perspective. That depends on what you accept as valid proof. That is a fallacy as we are left with bandwagon/authority fallacy considering s...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 26, 2019 3:50 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity
Replies: 25
Views: 474

Re: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity

False considering Time can be observed strictly as a variation of space where one space is divided through another. Thus we are left with space and randomness where randomness is a percieve multiplicity of spaces conducive to an approximation of space itself. Thus we are left with space. Since time...
by Eodnhoj7
Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:58 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Language
Topic: Unproven assumptions
Replies: 21
Views: 322

Re: Unproven assumptions

It seems to me that most of what we say if full of unproven assumptions. The sentence I have just written does not assume anything because of the introduction unit "it seems to me". The second sentence I have just written does not assume anything either, because it is purely analytical. Or do you s...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:20 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: The ontological error of Philosophy
Replies: 136
Views: 1674

Re: The ontological error of Philosophy

There is a mantra in the field of scientific inquiry: If you ask a stupid question - you will get a stupid answer. I am of the opinion that all ontological questions in the form of "What is X?" are stupid questions. We live in a dynamic universe. Change is the only constant is colloquial wisdom. Ti...
by Eodnhoj7
Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:19 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity
Replies: 25
Views: 474

Re: Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity

[/color]4 user_id=17231] Efficiency is subject to to many variables that make it inefficient...hence a paradox. Computational complexity is only subject to three. Space, time and randomness. It's in the very abstract I quoted. False considering Time can be observed strictly as a variation of space ...