Search found 8791 matches

by bahman
Wed Feb 07, 2024 7:37 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: The mind is omnipresent in space-time
Replies: 80
Views: 5607

Re: The mind is omnipresent in space-time

What do you mean by 'substance'? By substance, I mean something that exists and has a set of properties. 1. What do you mean by 'properties'. Check dictionary! 2. What are the properties of 'Mind', 'space', 'time', and 'spacetime'? Mind is a substance with the ability to experience and cause. The p...
by bahman
Tue Feb 06, 2024 7:27 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: The mind is omnipresent in space-time
Replies: 80
Views: 5607

Re: The mind is omnipresent in space-time

So are you saying that space is not made of particles? ("Time" is a concept yes?) Space and time are components of spacetime. Spacetime is not made of particles at least with the classical regime. My understanding is that Space is expanding therefore is it made of particles. No one knows ...
by bahman
Tue Feb 06, 2024 11:56 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: The mind is omnipresent in space-time
Replies: 80
Views: 5607

Re: The mind is omnipresent in space-time

"bahman" will you; Firstly, define what the words below actually mean and refer to, to you, exactly? Then, list the order of those words when they came to exist? Starting with what eternally exists, if there are any to you. Mind. The mind is a substance with the ability to experience and ...
by bahman
Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:34 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: The mind is omnipresent in space-time
Replies: 80
Views: 5607

Re: The mind is omnipresent in space-time

Spacetime is a substance. By physical I mean, stuff like objects, electrons, protons, light, and the like. So are you saying that space is not made of particles? ("Time" is a concept yes?) Space and time are components of spacetime. Spacetime is not made of particles at least with the cla...
by bahman
Tue Feb 06, 2024 10:30 am
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: The mind is omnipresent in space-time
Replies: 80
Views: 5607

Re: The mind is omnipresent in space-time

Age wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 10:49 pm
bahman wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:50 pm
VVilliam wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:38 pm

Are you suggesting space is not physical?
Spacetime is a substance. By physical I mean, stuff like objects, electrons, protons, light, and the like.
What do you mean by 'substance'?
By substance, I mean something that exists and has a set of properties.
by bahman
Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:50 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: The mind is omnipresent in space-time
Replies: 80
Views: 5607

Re: The mind is omnipresent in space-time

VVilliam wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:38 pm
bahman wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:27 pm
VVilliam wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 6:55 pm

Are you saying that Spacetime is reality?
No, it is part of reality. Physical makes another part.
Are you suggesting space is not physical?
Spacetime is a substance. By physical I mean, stuff like objects, electrons, protons, light, and the like.
by bahman
Mon Feb 05, 2024 7:27 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Mind
Topic: The mind is omnipresent in space-time
Replies: 80
Views: 5607

Re: The mind is omnipresent in space-time

VVilliam wrote: Mon Feb 05, 2024 6:55 pm
bahman wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 8:47 pm
Dimebag wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:58 pm Would you object to saying space and time are present in mind?
Spacetime is a fundamental aspect of reality without it nothing can be caused.
Are you saying that Spacetime is reality?
No, it is part of reality. Physical makes another part.
by bahman
Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:09 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Religion
Topic: Anselm argument and problem within
Replies: 121
Views: 17975

Re: Anselm argument and problem within

God is the greatest imaginable thing according to Anselm. I can imagine something greater but not the greatest. That is the whole message. You cannot imagine something greater than a truly perfect being/existence. That's like saying you can imagine something more triangular than a perfect triangle....
by bahman
Mon Feb 05, 2024 1:08 pm
Forum: Philosophy of Religion
Topic: Anselm argument and problem within
Replies: 121
Views: 17975

Re: Anselm argument and problem within

Let's focus on omnipotent for a moment. That means that God has to be extremely strong, or better to say infinitely strong. However, according to Cantor's theorem , the infinity is not the largest number. In fact, he shows that there is no largest infinity since there is always a number bigger than...
by bahman
Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:42 am
Forum: Ethical Theory
Topic: Moral Relativists 'Accept' Genocides
Replies: 202
Views: 5877

Re: Moral Relativists 'Accept' Genocides

You cannot expect that 100% of children show a behavior in an experiment! In fact, the result of the first experiment shows that only three-quarters of the children choose the good guy instead of the bad guy. The same applies to other experiments. Moreover, it is shown that children are selfish and...
by bahman
Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:01 am
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible
Replies: 220
Views: 5148

Re: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible

In which, supposed, former post did you, supposedly, explain this? A long time ago and in many posts. Great to see that you noticed and acknowledge one of your so-called 'problems' here. Did you also notice how since the thinking or belief has changed within 'that body', then, according to your log...
by bahman
Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:03 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible
Replies: 220
Views: 5148

Re: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible

Okay, in regard to the laws of nature, mathematics, the empirical world around us, etc., it certainly appears that there are objective truths that transcend the "human condition" itself. My own "beef" with the truth revolves instead around conflicting value judgments. And yet gi...
by bahman
Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:58 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible
Replies: 220
Views: 5148

Re: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible

Yes, you have. You don’t seem to understand what a beginning is. I understand what beginning is. Do you understand what being to exist means? If yes, please elaborate. Beginning is not being then being. No, that is not correct. I used "begin to exist" for the case that something did not e...
by bahman
Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:34 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible
Replies: 220
Views: 5148

Re: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible

If nothing to something is possible, then time had a beginning at some point. Sure, but as I have said several times that does not mean that it began to exist. Yes, you have. You don’t seem to understand what a beginning is. I understand what beginning is. Do you understand what being to exist mean...
by bahman
Sat Feb 03, 2024 7:31 pm
Forum: Metaphysics
Topic: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible
Replies: 220
Views: 5148

Re: Nothing to somthing is logically impossible

It looks like you are just changing from no time to time—just another way of saying from nothing to something. So if nothing to something is impossible, then time has no beginning. Wrong! I won't repeat the argument though. If nothing to something is possible, then time had a beginning at some poin...