Philosophy Now Forum

accelafine wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 11:17 pm What does he do that's particularly 'dictatorial'? Asking for a friend.

He uses the exact same scam that Hitler used to rise to power.
By repeating the same emotionally charged sound bite he has
converted many.

So, what is the actual irrefutable Truth here, was there never any evidence of election fraud? Or, was there some evidence of election fraud? The key fact here is that if we collected the total of all of the voter fraud cases everywhere in the USA for the last three years: 1499 that is not enough v...

Pete, we are talking at cross purposes; I’m a philosopher, and it seems you are primarily interested in rhetoric. I happen to think your strategy is also weak from a propaganda point of view, but I am not skilled in rhetoric. Instead of “There never was any evidence of election fraud sufficient to ...

#NeverAnyElectionFraud --- Spread the Word!
This counter-propaganda must be endlessly repeated

Pete, we are talking at cross purposes; I’m a philosopher, and it seems you are primarily interested in rhetoric. I happen to think your strategy is also weak from a propaganda point of view, but I am not skilled in rhetoric. Instead of “There never was any evidence of election fraud sufficient to ...

So, what is the actual irrefutable Truth here, was there never any evidence of election fraud? Or, was there some evidence of election fraud? The key fact here is that if we collected the total of all of the voter fraud cases everywhere in the USA for the last three years: 1499 that is not enough v...

For all practical purposes there never was any evidence of election fraud. Do you mean this from: your perspective? Some people's perspective? Every one's perspective? Thus, is 'your claim' here: your truth? Some people's truth? The actual irrefutable Truth? I knew there was hardly any cases I now ...

There is a difference between the qualified and unqualified versions of the "no fraud" claim, Pete, and it's crucial. Omitting the "nearly sufficient to change the outcome" qualification isn't summarising, it's traducing. Instead of generating a useful discussion of the evidence...

But that in itself is a lie, Peter! As such, it muddies the waters in the interests of the MAGA people. I wouldn’t post it if I were you. (1) There never was any evidence of election fraud nearly sufficient to change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election summed up as the sound bite: #NeverA...

(1) There never was any evidence of election fraud nearly sufficient to change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election summed up as the sound bite: #NeverAnyElectionFraud (2) It is a verified fact that Trump keeps repeating this. (3) Continuing to repeat this lie endlessly <is> the Nazi "...

#NeverAnyElectionFraud --- Spread the Word!
This counter-propaganda must be endlessly repeated

The common sense understanding of truth is the correspondence theory of truth. From now on referred to as CTT. If the CTT is true,what does it refer to? Another CTT? Depending on your perspective that is a tautology or an infinite regress. So what is truth? PS;The CTT is the theory that a propositi...

You did have a sequence of replies that were reasonable and
addressed the points that I made.

When I actually proved my point so that there was no actual
rebuttal you began spouting nonsense.

When construed as a Boolean return value from termination analyzer H for input input D that does that opposite of whatever Boolean value that H returns we know that it must be (True or False) & Wrong. You know this an play head games so that your own behavior matches your chosen name. You are n...

When construed as a Boolean return value from termination analyzer H for input input D that does that opposite of whatever Boolean value that H returns we know that it must be (True or False) & Wrong. You know this an play head games so that your own behavior matches your chosen name. You are no...