Search found 11774 matches

by Arising_uk
Tue Sep 17, 2019 10:38 am
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: Quadrant Model
Replies: 31
Views: 329

Re: Quadrant Model

Finally, some one who is curious and OPEN enough to at least ask a clarifying question. So, thank you. God, just like the Universe, is made up of two parts: 1. A physical visible part. And, 2. An invisible part. What 'invisible part'? 'God', in the physical sense, is every physical thing. ... Okay....
by Arising_uk
Mon Sep 16, 2019 11:02 am
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: Quadrant Model
Replies: 31
Views: 329

Re: Quadrant Model

Age wrote:
I say that 'I' am God and that I can prove it. Most of 'you', human beings, consider this to be about as much as a 'nutjob' as one could get.
What do you mean by 'God'?
by Arising_uk
Mon Sep 16, 2019 10:29 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Kant
Replies: 231
Views: 2317

Re: Kant

Yadda yadda ..bla bla...bla... Why would anyone waste time on Kant, the babblehead? It's outdated nonsense!! It well may be Hex but have you actually read him? The reason why some have to read Kant and the other Germans is that they are studying Continental Philosophy and as such he was a larger st...
by Arising_uk
Sun Sep 15, 2019 2:22 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Kant
Replies: 231
Views: 2317

Re: Kant

Phenomena = appearances, and noumena = things-in-themselves, so far so good (if I understood correctly).... [\quote]You didn't. But did he understand that technically and objectively, all phenomena are noumena (the noumena in the human head)? So some of the noumenon is directly 'knowable'. As you a...
by Arising_uk
Sun Sep 15, 2019 9:59 am
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Kant
Replies: 231
Views: 2317

Re: Kant

Kant said many things but in this case I guess you'll be talking about this. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Critique_of_Pure_Reason.html?id=hnARAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y So read him for yourself and get back to us with your critique. See you in about a ye...
by Arising_uk
Sun Sep 15, 2019 1:47 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

All assumptions, as assumed, are inherently recursive and circular ... Not sure what you mean by recursion here as that generally has a base case that halts the recursion so not circular at all? ...this "form" is assumed "as it" considering it is an empty context in and of itself. No idea what this...
by Arising_uk
Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:54 pm
Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
Topic: Individualism vs. Collectivism
Replies: 337
Views: 4364

Re: Individualism vs. Collectivism

Immanuel Can wrote:... God Himself....
'God' has a gender?
You'd better hope 'its' not a Herself then.
by Arising_uk
Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:56 am
Forum: The Lounge
Topic: Quadrant Model
Replies: 31
Views: 329

Re: Quadrant Model

Go on tell us, we know you're dying to.
by Arising_uk
Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:43 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Try to escape a cycle...and you can't...that should answer all of the above.
Is the above true or is it just another assumption?

If the former can you tell me how you got it?
by Arising_uk
Thu Sep 12, 2019 1:00 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

So the principle of identity does not apply to 1=1? and P=P does not necessitate equality as a part of "logic"? The former is a principle of equality in Mathematics, at base it is telling you that the number of objects on the left equals the number of objects on the right. As for the latter, I've a...
by Arising_uk
Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:57 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

Equality, is thus both undefined and subject to equivocation within the law of identity while dually necessitating that identity is not just assumed through recursive Directional forms ... No idea what you are trying to say but "Equality" is a mathematical concept and "Identity" I guess can be a lo...
by Arising_uk
Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:06 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

But that is what Eastern religions thought when they invented the concepts of yin and yang. One became two. They didn't know that since they were one, yin and yang did not exist Yet to come up with the idea requires knowledge of yin and yang. Once again good scotch proves its value for getting to t...
by Arising_uk
Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:04 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

Eodnhoj7 wrote:So the law of identity is not necessary for logic?
If you mean this "A=A" then no in Propositional Logic '=' is not used. I guess it could be but it is not necessary, you could say (P->P)^(P<-P) which is the bi-conditional and this is a tautology which is always true and as such necessary.
by Arising_uk
Sun Sep 08, 2019 3:32 am
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
A=A, the most basic law of identity sets the grounds for circularity in these respects. ...
But it's not the most basic 'law' is it, in fact it does not even appear in propositional logic.
by Arising_uk
Fri Sep 06, 2019 3:22 pm
Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
Topic: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void
Replies: 127
Views: 1343

Re: Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

Words are in essence empty, words appear to fill in the gap (VOID) with what appears to be some solid thing in and of itself separate from the word, but at grassroots, isn't any thing at all. ... If this is what you believe then I wonder why you bother talking at all? It takes one to perceive itsel...