Search found 14253 matches
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:34 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Now let us deal with some facts - facts that the 'gun grabbers' refuse to accept: I quote the following: Murder by Gun Control by L. Neil Smith ...........Gun control may have felt like a nice, warm, fuzzy idea to its advocates back in the 1960s. However today, owing to a great deal of serious lega...
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:33 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Fair enough, Walker, I get your meaning. You're trying to explain to me that the US is a theocracy, which explains why so many Americans are such an immoral murderous gang of bandits who stand willing to trample all over the human rights of anybody who doesn't agree with them. It seems that you and...
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:33 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
The question man makes an assertion.
You're branching out.
You could stop there and be a bigot.
Or, you could expand your awareness sufficiently to form principles applicable to man ... perhaps.
You'd be venturing into philosophy.
How to get there from here ... hmmmm.
You're branching out.
You could stop there and be a bigot.
Or, you could expand your awareness sufficiently to form principles applicable to man ... perhaps.
You'd be venturing into philosophy.
How to get there from here ... hmmmm.
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 8:05 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Philosophically and rationally, You do not give life to yourself. Whatever does, is God. And god has given you the right to shoot any fucker who happens to get up your nose, has he? God bless America. Think it over, Leo. I’ve read your words and you’re very smart, too smart to snarl. There’s nothin...
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:39 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Oh, you're the guy who asks the questions! That's who you are!
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:32 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Now you have enough to work with.
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:30 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Philosophically and rationally,
You do not give life to yourself.
Whatever does, is God.
You do not give life to yourself.
Whatever does, is God.
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:25 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Henry makes a lot of Philosophical Sense. Thread title is wrong, not surprising. Here is the Philosophical Position: The right to defend what is God-given is the right. What is given by God is precious, in your care. Henry offers the position of responsibility. Each human is responsible for what is...
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 7:19 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
I was wondering how long it would take before somebody brought god into the conversation. In the US and the middle east god and guns go hand in hand. Best to recognize reality, and build from there. Much more productive than butterflies. The U.S. Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence, m...
- Tue Dec 08, 2015 6:44 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
- Replies: 83
- Views: 19063
Re: The Right to bear arms for the purpose of domestic resistance.
Henry makes a lot of Philosophical Sense. Thread title is wrong, not surprising. Here is the Philosophical Position: The right to defend what is God-given is the right. What is given by God is precious, in your care. Henry offers the position of responsibility. Each human is responsible for what is ...
- Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:12 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Lawyers, Blondes & Irishmen
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2112
- Mon Dec 07, 2015 12:19 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Lawyers, Blondes & Irishmen
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2112
Re: Lawyers, Blondes & Irishmen
That humour can be used as a weapon, or to sit on others, for sure. But what does humour do for a conversation? Is it a way to kill conversation? Ha, ha, but seriously... Being in social events, sometimes a joke can be extremely uplifting, but sometimes people making nudge, nudges all the time can ...
- Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:57 am
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Lawyers, Blondes & Irishmen
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2112
Re: Lawyers, Blondes & Irishmen
People used to laugh at themselves.
Now folks have notions to laugh at others.
One approach leads to mental toughness.
The other approach leads to bigotry.
Don Rickles Goes Nuts at Ronald Reagan's 2nd Inaugural - Jan., 1985!!!
Now folks have notions to laugh at others.
One approach leads to mental toughness.
The other approach leads to bigotry.
Don Rickles Goes Nuts at Ronald Reagan's 2nd Inaugural - Jan., 1985!!!
- Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:00 am
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: When Will Humanity Become Human?
- Replies: 100
- Views: 19362
Re: When Will Humanity Become Human?
. ................................................................ https://ilovekadampabuddhism.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/empathy.jpg?w=350&h=352 Self cherishing means something in Buddhism A mental attitude that considers oneself to be supremely important and precious. It is regarded as a pr...
- Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:36 am
- Forum: Applied Ethics
- Topic: When Will Humanity Become Human?
- Replies: 100
- Views: 19362
Re: When Will Humanity Become Human?
Actually I think it more appropriate just to ask deep philosophical questions & open the thread up to stimulating conversations with fellow members here. Do you really want me to ask & immediately ANSWER the questions that I put forward? Don't ALL OF US post just another in a long line of s...