Search found 159 matches
- Mon Nov 30, 2015 9:41 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Heres the whole thing: I think Moyo is trying to have his cake and eat it too because the human consciousness is the loneliest place in the entire universe. We might imagine that an inter-subjective agreement on the identity of an "object" represents some sort of transcendent "truth&q...
- Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:46 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
I'm back for a bit... I've never met people as slight headed as those on this forum. 1 divided by zero not included. This is what i did. I twisted the flow of this debate so that "being the mindless ..*things* that you are" , you ended up saying what i was saying and i ended up saying what...
- Mon Nov 16, 2015 3:14 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
lol......coward!
- Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:53 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: Zero divided by Zero equals 0 & 1 & ∞
- Replies: 116
- Views: 34370
Re: Zero divided by Zero equals 0 & 1 & ∞
LETS SEE what WE HAVE here :^) Recall that an equivalent realtion partitions a set into equivalence classes. We start of with the cartesian product X = Z X Z* , where Z is the integer numbers and Z* is the integers without "0". We then have an equivalence relation (a,d)R(b,c) iff ad=bc (t...
- Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:17 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Hobbes You keep avoiding How is the concept "that which is objective" related to "that which is objective". Explain the relationship. Explain your fucking question! The relationship is that they appear near each other on the page, but are otherwise the same collection of letters...
- Sun Nov 15, 2015 8:43 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Hobbes You keep avoiding
How is the concept "that which is objective" related to "that which is objective".
Explain the relationship.
How is the concept "that which is objective" related to "that which is objective".
Explain the relationship.
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:47 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Again please do not avoid;
How is the concept "that which is objective" related to "that which is objective "
Explain the relationship.
How is the concept "that which is objective" related to "that which is objective "
Explain the relationship.
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:56 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Hobbes...i removed the bold and italics when i rephrased it here;
You know what i mean...all i know is "A" is equal to "A" .There is the concept "that which is objective"...how is it related to "that which is objective"
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:43 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
One laaast try. How is the concept " that which is objective " related to " that which is objective " I want to see you repeat yourself silly ...and you still wont get it *sigh* Answer they are related to each other, because you have used the same letters. The only difference is...
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:15 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
One laaast try.
How is the concept "that which is objective" related to "that which is objective"
I want to see you repeat yourself silly ...and you still wont get it *sigh*
How is the concept "that which is objective" related to "that which is objective"
I want to see you repeat yourself silly ...and you still wont get it *sigh*
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 4:06 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
better post later
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:47 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
lease, first respond to the post I made above dated: Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:12 am you seem to think i'm making a slight of hand when i talk about meaning. So here is a short reply; meaning happens in minds if objective reality was meaningful it would have to be related to its meaning or, by transitivi...
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 2:50 pm
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Hobbes ; i hope you are not doing this on purpose so i will tr yet again.
Can you conceive of something that is not a concept?
Can you conceive of something that is not a concept?
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:43 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Perhaps we could reitterate a previous post of mine If you say you think there are some aspects about that object that dont have anything to do with concepts then that is a lie thinking cannot help but have something to do with concepts. If the thought was about the aspects then those aspects (which...
- Sat Nov 14, 2015 7:25 am
- Forum: Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics
- Topic: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
- Replies: 232
- Views: 47969
Re: The Axiom Of Identity *Challenged*
Meaning is established when two subjects agree. Subject One: I have a concept of tree; I point: "there is a tree!" Subject Two: "Oh yes, that is a tree." Thus "tree" is that object identified by agreement. Therefore "tree" has meaning. It is not more complica...