Search found 907 matches
- Sun Jun 20, 2021 8:46 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: What is philosophy?
- Replies: 255
- Views: 27556
Re: What is philosophy?
No time like the present. So, what is "the ACTUAL 'data'"? Well that will all depend on what 'you' and 'I' agree with and accept. Do 'you' agree with and accept that red-shifted objects are moving away from us is actual data? No. The red-shift is the data; any explanation for that data, s...
- Thu Jun 03, 2021 10:55 am
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
I wasn't meaning you personally. Nothing wrong with opinions. One of Philosophy's greatest achivements is offering methods for knowing what questions make sense; how to ask questions; what the answers might mean; what is it like to ask them; ". And without explicit foundations and logic, these...
- Tue Jun 01, 2021 4:39 am
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
Is this an objection, or just an observation? It is an observation. The practice of philosophy is little more than a parlour game. I do not think anything I said would engender that response, no. I wasn't meaning you personally.[/quote] Nothing wrong with opinions. One of Philosophy's greatest achi...
- Mon May 31, 2021 8:12 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
There are very few philosphical matters than have been totally abandoned. Whilst much has been refined, all the old arguments are still with us. Philosophy is not about solutions but about asking questions anf point out possible consequence. Science is about describing the universe in ever more det...
- Mon May 31, 2021 3:51 am
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
haha Lol but I was being serious!! There are very few philosphical matters than have been totally abandoned. Whilst much has been refined, all the old arguments are still with us. Philosophy is not about solutions but about asking questions anf point out possible consequence. Science is about descr...
- Tue May 25, 2021 11:17 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Tue May 25, 2021 8:36 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
When it works better and is consonant with other theories. That is the progress of science. And that is the progress of philosophy. No. Philosophy does not progress. It is a system of and methods of asking questions. Once it concludes, it is dead. Can you prove that? If not, have you considered the...
- Tue May 25, 2021 12:19 am
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Fri May 21, 2021 7:26 am
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: How Good Do We Have To Be?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1287
Re: How Good Do We Have To Be?
With so many serious problems in the world, Jean Kazez asks whether there’s any excuse to buy ourselves new toys, or even take up more worthy pastimes like playing the violin. Her reflections take in Paul Farmer, Peter Singer, Susan Wolf and Nietzsche. https://philosophynow.org/issues/58/How_Good_D...
- Thu May 20, 2021 8:52 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
Except that philosophy can have co-existing competing paradigms since it does not primarily relate the the physical world. Yes certainly philosophy can have many co-existing paradigms. But ultimately they have to have some correlation with the physical world lest they are pure fantasy. Yes but I wa...
- Tue May 18, 2021 11:24 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Tree of Knowledge
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2337
Re: Tree of Knowledge
Rick wrote: "Let’s hope that taste doesn’t lead you astray!" I find this comment to be both bizarre and interesting. I mean perhaps it is you that has been led astray? How could you know that it is not? Could you prove it? It also opens up the question: "How can one determine whether ...
- Tue May 18, 2021 11:10 pm
- Forum: Articles in Philosophy Now
- Topic: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
- Replies: 137
- Views: 39512
Re: Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996)
Kuhn's work on paradigms applies not only to the philosophy of science but to the philosophy of philosophy as well. Except that philosophy can have co-existing competing paradigms since it does not primarily relate the the physical world. Yes certainly philosophy can have many co-existing paradigms...
- Tue Jul 07, 2020 12:38 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Mind
- Topic: Consciousness = Self-awareness?
- Replies: 30
- Views: 9203
Re: Consciousness = Self-awareness?
I just Googled for an experiment of that ilk and it seems that my intense behavioural study of the pooches at home is paying off :lol: http://www.sciencealert.com/it-s-offici ... sciousness While I think the experiment is interesting I don't find it conclusive of self awareness.. or consciousness.....
- Sat Jun 20, 2020 10:31 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Society, Slavery and Employment
- Replies: 1
- Views: 855
Re: Society, Slavery and Employment
<> THE INTERESTING conclusion from the above is that a ‘slave’ having guaranteed care during his life, may therefore be in a better position than the wage slave who may be cast aside into beggary when his labour is no longer required. And that is why some people have in the past, and perhaps still ...
- Sat Jun 20, 2020 10:28 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: Are You Enjoying Your Life?
- Replies: 64
- Views: 9759
Re: Are You Enjoying You Life?
Too true. And if you are not enjoying your philosophy there is something wrong with your life.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Jun 20, 2020 9:32 pm If you are not enjoying your life there is something wrong with your philosophy.