FSRK = Language Games?
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 6:21 am
I am not saying the FSRK is precisely the same as Language Games in forms but merely in substance, i.e. the principles involved.
In a way, the language game is a embodied human-based linguistic FSRK that generate linguistic knowledge.
As such, those who agree with the later-Wittgenstein should be able to reconcile to the concept of a language game in terms of principles to that of an FSRK of which the scientific FSRK is the most credible and objective.
Discuss??
Views??
My FSRK is also a self-contained [with a Framework] System of thought and action that based on a "form of life" that can only be characterized in terms of what people do and think, how they live - and not in objective mind- and body- free terms.The later-Wittgenstein argued, against formal logic, that categories such as game could not be characterized using necessary and sufficient conditions but were, instead, defined by family resemblances.
His notion of a language-game preserves the common Thought as Language metaphor, but challenges the notion that meaning can be given in terms of the objective world.
A language-game is a Self-contained system of thought and action and is based on a "form of life" that can only be characterized in terms of what people do and think, how they live - and not in objective mind- and body- free terms.
Philosophy in the Flesh
In a way, the language game is a embodied human-based linguistic FSRK that generate linguistic knowledge.
As such, those who agree with the later-Wittgenstein should be able to reconcile to the concept of a language game in terms of principles to that of an FSRK of which the scientific FSRK is the most credible and objective.
Discuss??
Views??