There ARE NO 'readers' save MAYBE HALF a DOZEN, and 'they' ALREADY KNOW 'your' LIES and DISTORTIONS WELL and need NO FURTHER EXPLANATION from 'me'.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:56 pmAnd obviously if I asked you to inform the readers here of what is supposedly and allegedly not correct in what I have said, then you will not do so.Atla wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 3:33 pmIT would HELP, 'age', IF 'you' said things that ARE actually CORRECT.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 9:21 am
1. Because of your disability here "atla" you could not name one presumed assumption you allege and claim I have here.
And,
2. Although you lack any and all ability to just support your claims you also appear to have another complete lack of ability to know what some words actually mean and/or refer to exactly.
Again, this is because of the very severe disability, which you keep proving you have here.
But as I keep informing you your very severe disability here "atla" is the result of presuming and believing things to be true, which actually are not.
The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
The absolute disability of this one can be clearly seen here, once again.Atla wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 6:13 amThere ARE NO 'readers' save MAYBE HALF a DOZEN, and 'they' ALREADY KNOW 'your' LIES and DISTORTIONS WELL and need NO FURTHER EXPLANATION from 'me'.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:56 pmAnd obviously if I asked you to inform the readers here of what is supposedly and allegedly not correct in what I have said, then you will not do so.
Again, this is because of the very severe disability, which you keep proving you have here.
But as I keep informing you your very severe disability here "atla" is the result of presuming and believing things to be true, which actually are not.
Its own presumptions and beliefs have led it far, far astray also, once more.
But this was just how Truly disabled some people were, back then.
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
And ABSOLUTELY NO ONE will read 'your' BLATHERINGS in the 'FUTURE', as 'we' ALL KNOW.Age wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 7:03 amThe absolute disability of this one can be clearly seen here, once again.Atla wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 6:13 amThere ARE NO 'readers' save MAYBE HALF a DOZEN, and 'they' ALREADY KNOW 'your' LIES and DISTORTIONS WELL and need NO FURTHER EXPLANATION from 'me'.Age wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:56 pm
And obviously if I asked you to inform the readers here of what is supposedly and allegedly not correct in what I have said, then you will not do so.
Again, this is because of the very severe disability, which you keep proving you have here.
But as I keep informing you your very severe disability here "atla" is the result of presuming and believing things to be true, which actually are not.
Its own presumptions and beliefs have led it far, far astray also, once more.
But this was just how Truly disabled some people were, back then.
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
But this has already been proven untrue.Atla wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 9:55 amAnd ABSOLUTELY NO ONE will read 'your' BLATHERINGS in the 'FUTURE', as 'we' ALL KNOW.
Also, and by the way, why do you write some words in capital letters?
Are you shouting and getting angry?
If yes, then why, exactly?
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
'it' has NOT been proven UNTRUE, NOR WILL 'it' BE, as 'we' ALL KNOW.Age wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:23 amBut this has already been proven untrue.
Also, and by the way, why do you write some words in capital letters?
Are you shouting and getting angry?
If yes, then why, exactly?
THINK AGAIN, 'you' can NOT make 'me' ANGRY.
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
Here we have another example of another who believes that it knows what has happened absolutely everywhere and believes what will happen forever more.Atla wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:31 am'it' has NOT been proven UNTRUE, NOR WILL 'it' BE, as 'we' ALL KNOW.
A lot of people, back then, really were that sure of "themselves", even though how absurd it Truly is.
What do you mean by, 'THINK AGAIN'?
I just asked you a very, very simple question, for clarity. What we have here is another prime example of just how much these people, back then, would continually assume things. They did it so often that they actually presumed that others must do it as often and as regularly as they do.
Also, notice this ones complete and utter disability to just answer the actual clarifying questions posed, and asked to it.
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
BUT the answers are fairly CLEAR and OBVIOUS to 'most' people, 'you' are HOPELESSLY LOST. NOT 'my' JOB to FIX 'your' PROBLEMS.Age wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:36 amHere we have another example of another who believes that it knows what has happened absolutely everywhere and believes what will happen forever more.
A lot of people, back then, really were that sure of "themselves", even though how absurd it Truly is.What do you mean by, 'THINK AGAIN'?
I just asked you a very, very simple question, for clarity. What we have here is another prime example of just how much these people, back then, would continually assume things. They did it so often that they actually presumed that others must do it as often and as regularly as they do.
Also, notice this ones complete and utter disability to just answer the actual clarifying questions posed, and asked to it.
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
If you say and believe so, then it must be so, right?Atla wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:46 amBUT the answers are fairly CLEAR and OBVIOUS to 'most' people, 'you' are HOPELESSLY LOST. NOT 'my' JOB to FIX 'your' PROBLEMS.Age wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:36 amHere we have another example of another who believes that it knows what has happened absolutely everywhere and believes what will happen forever more.
A lot of people, back then, really were that sure of "themselves", even though how absurd it Truly is.What do you mean by, 'THINK AGAIN'?
I just asked you a very, very simple question, for clarity. What we have here is another prime example of just how much these people, back then, would continually assume things. They did it so often that they actually presumed that others must do it as often and as regularly as they do.
Also, notice this ones complete and utter disability to just answer the actual clarifying questions posed, and asked to it.
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
In THIS case, ALMOST certainly YES.Age wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 12:21 pmIf you say and believe so, then it must be so, right?Atla wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:46 amBUT the answers are fairly CLEAR and OBVIOUS to 'most' people, 'you' are HOPELESSLY LOST. NOT 'my' JOB to FIX 'your' PROBLEMS.Age wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 10:36 am
Here we have another example of another who believes that it knows what has happened absolutely everywhere and believes what will happen forever more.
A lot of people, back then, really were that sure of "themselves", even though how absurd it Truly is.
What do you mean by, 'THINK AGAIN'?
I just asked you a very, very simple question, for clarity. What we have here is another prime example of just how much these people, back then, would continually assume things. They did it so often that they actually presumed that others must do it as often and as regularly as they do.
Also, notice this ones complete and utter disability to just answer the actual clarifying questions posed, and asked to it.
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
Re: The Beauty of a Scenery is Man-Made, not God-Made
So, to you, what you believe is true, must not necessarily be true at all. Okay.
Okay. If you say and believe so.