You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellousAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:19 amI am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:53 am Mate let’s cut to the chase. The definition of Human in any dictionary and in any language is binary. Therefor the non binary are not human. It is a satanic word to refute what we all are. Mankind Male/Female
Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?
Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?
Human
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human Boing
Last edited by Philosphicalous on Fri Nov 17, 2023 3:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human
Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 amYou’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next. I think thats a marvellous achievementAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:19 amI am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:53 am Mate let’s cut to the chase. The definition of Human in any dictionary and in any language is binary. Therefor the non binary are not human. It is a satanic word to refute what we all are. Mankind Male/Female
Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?
Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human
Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:23 amThe 'personal feeling' of 'the word' WAS, 'I do NOT like it'.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:10 amI shared a personal view of my feelings of the word because I don’t like it’s definition.
WHICH EXPLAINS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, other than 'you' do NOT like the 'Human' word, ABOUT WHY 'you' have CHOSEN TO CALL "your" 'self' A 'Man', INSTEAD.Which is WHAT, EXACTLY?Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:10 am You still refuse to accept the word Human has a definition that is clearly defined.
LOOK I KNOW that the word 'Human' AND the word 'human' HAS A DEFINITION. WHY would 'you' ASSUME I REFUSE to ACCEPT that 'this' or ANY word HAS A DEFINITION?
And, as 'you' STILL SEEM TO BE ABSOLUTELY CONFUSED here, I AM JUST TRYING TO FIND OUT HOW 'you' are DEFINING the 'Human' word here.
Or, what do 'you' think or BELIEVE is the so-called called and alleged CLEAR DEFINITION for the 'Human' word?
Are 'you' even AWARE that 'you' REFUSING TO JUST WRITE DOWN the so-called CLEAR DEFINITION of the 'Human' word is SHOWING and REVEALING that, ACTUALLY, 'you' do NOT even KNOW what 'it' IS, EXACTLY?
The definition for human is male/female humanity everybody on earth I’m not defending the word, it’s an archaic word and exceedingly problematic for the non binary earthlings
Re: Human Boing
Just so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 amYou’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellousAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:19 amI am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 1:53 am Mate let’s cut to the chase. The definition of Human in any dictionary and in any language is binary. Therefor the non binary are not human. It is a satanic word to refute what we all are. Mankind Male/Female
Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?
Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?
1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.
2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.
3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.
4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?
5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?
6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?
7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?
Re: Human
What IS 'this life', and, What IS the 'next life'?Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 amYou’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next.Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:19 am
I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.
Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?
Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?
Okay.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human Boing
Dude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to youAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:27 amJust so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 amYou’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellousAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:19 am
I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.
Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?
Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?
1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.
2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.
3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.
4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?
5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?
6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?
7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human
You tell me what YOU think it is first.Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:28 amWhat IS 'this life', and, What IS the 'next life'?Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 amYou’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next.Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:19 am
I am STILL NOT SURE WHY 'you' do NOT like the 'human' word, especially when referring to 'you', human beings.
Also, WHY do 'you', ACTUALLY, prefer that those human bodies with female reproductive organs be CALLED, LABELLED, and OF 'Mankind' but NOT 'humankind'?
Would NOT putting the human bodies with female reproductive organs under the name or label 'human' be FAR LESS CONFUSING than under the name or label 'man', to 'you'?Okay.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human Boing
You don’t belong in a philosophy forum.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:31 amDude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to youAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:27 amJust so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 am
You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellous
1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.
2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.
3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.
4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?
5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?
6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?
7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?
Re: Human Boing
SO, 'you' come here, to this philosophy forum, TELL 'us' that 'you' identify as a 'man', BECAUSE 'you' do NOT like the word 'human', make some Truly IDIOTIC remark like, 'A human is man, including a male and female it is binary', and ASK 'us',Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:31 amDude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to youAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:27 amJust so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 am
You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind. I think that marvellous
1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.
2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.
3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.
4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?
5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?
6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?
7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?
1. What does it mean to be Human?
2. Do you “identify” as Human?
BUT, 'you' REFUSE to INFORM 'us' of how 'you' ARE, personally, 'defining the meaning' of the word 'Human', 'human', 'Man', and 'man'.
Even after 'you' went on to CLAIM some absolute NONSENSE, I put it to you dear friend be you binary or non, that the non binary no longer qualify to be human and or to even identify as being a human. I speak standing on the solid rock of the origin and meaning of the “word” Human. while going on ABOUT some 'solid rock origin and meaning of the word 'Human'.
AND, to make ALL of 'this' even MORE Truly ABSURD 'you' CLAIM that 'you' joined 'this forum' to, LAUGHABLY, so-call, 'genuinely discuss' 'this premise'.
1. If 'you' GENUINELY want to have A DISCUSSION around the meaning and/or definition of A word, THEN 'you' PROVIDE 'your' OWN personal definition, which 'you' are USING here.
2. Saying that 'you' identify as a 'Man', BECAUSE 'you' do NOT like the word 'Human', is NOT REALLY A 'premise', NECESSARILY. Or, NOT one WORTHY of DISCUSSING anyway.
Re: Human
1. If and when 'you' TELL 'me' to do some 'thing', then do NOT expect that I will. However, ASK 'me' to CLARIFY some 'thing', and then I will do 'that' almost as soon as I see the QUESTION.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:31 amYou tell me what YOU think it is first.Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:28 amWhat IS 'this life', and, What IS the 'next life'?Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 2:24 am
You’re stuck on my feelings. Get over it. Everyone is mankind. The non binary are not human or a part of mankind. They don’t qualify. They exterminated themselves from mankind in this life and the next.Okay.
2. What does the 'it' word here even REFER TO, EXACTLY, which 'you' WANT 'me' TO, FIRST, TELL 'you' what 'I think' is?
Re: Human Boing
Are 'you' AWARE that 'you' just responded to "your" OWN 'self' here "philosphicalous"?Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:55 amYou don’t belong in a philosophy forum.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:31 amDude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to youAge wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:27 am
Just so 'you' ARE AWARE just about ALL of 'this' makes NO logical sense to 'me'.
1. I am NOT 'stuck' on 'your' feelings.
2. There is NOTHING here for 'me' to so-called 'get over'.
3. Saying, randomly, 'Everyone IS mankind', is just LUDICROUS.
4. What IS 'the' 'non binary', and, What IS 'the' 'binary', and how, EXACTLY, is the so-called 'non binary' NOT 'human' NOR even a PART OF so-called 'mankind'?
5. Who, or what, are 'they', which, supposedly, do NOT qualify?
6. Who, or what, supposedly, EXTERMINATED "themselves", FROM 'mankind'?
7. Does SHARING what 'you' think is 'marvelous' REALLY BELONG in a philosophy forum?
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human Boing
My research shows that the good folk here think your opinions are ridculus and that you need to go. I shall now comfortably put you on ignore forever more.Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:08 amAre 'you' AWARE that 'you' just responded to "your" OWN 'self' here "philosphicalous"?Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:55 amYou don’t belong in a philosophy forum.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:31 am
Dude I’m not here to define the meanings of words to you
Re: Human Boing
Okay GREAT.Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:17 amMy research shows that the good folk here think your opinions are ridculus and that you need to go. I shall now comfortably put you on ignore forever more.
What we, now, can VERY CLEARLY SEE is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of HOW these people would 'TRY TO' get OUT OF backing up and supporting what they SAY and CLAIM here, after they have been QUESTIONED and CHALLENGED OVER their WORDS and CLAIMS, and when they OBVIOUSLY COULD NOT back up and support their Truly ABSURD CLAIMS.
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:51 am
Re: Human Boing
Not as absurd as the claim that there are 65000 posts a day on this platform when you and Harbatrol are on the only two phucken Dick Whackers to respond to me. :lol
A very very very lackluster first impression.
A very very very lackluster first impression.
Re: Human Boing
Was "english" your FIRST language, as 'it' is said?Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:28 am Not as absurd as the claim that there are 65000 posts a day on this platform when you and Harbatrol are on the only two phucken Dick Whackers to respond to me. :lol
Okay.
But I STILL AWAIT for 'the one' who identifies as A 'man', and who does NOT like the 'human' word, to EXPLAIN what 'it' MEANS by 'man' AND 'human' when 'it' USES those words.