You deliberately choose not to take in and process the meaning of my comments. Your real purpose, or your primary purpose has nothing to do with Lindsay. All issues, for you, resolve into the primary theological question(s). Your primary purpose is Christian apologetics.
I certainly do not *blame* you for that or for what you choose to focus on. As I recently explained to Henry it is at this point less about the content of what is believed, but rather the structure of the argument that is used to support or defend the belief.
I have been thinking about *metaphysical dreams* (Weaver's term for metaphysical systems and their juncture with existential belief-systems). You are a man with a very precise metaphysical dream. That is why I refer to your *fanatical belief*. You see it one way, and you really believe it is that way and no other. You cannot see your system as a *lens* that you might compare to other existent lenses, and through that comparison be able to see and understand the value in other approaches or organizations of perception.
You know that I believe that the Hebrew system, or tendency, is to condemn as *demoniac* all other religious systems. And Christianity certainly inherited that. If that works for you, I cannot argue against your choice (though I certainly oppose some or many of your conclusions).
You have helped me to *destroy* in myself different aspects of absolutism in respect to metaphysical dreams. If your object is *apologetics* it is ironic that you achieve anti-apologetics.
And that in regard to everyone that you talk with here. You convince no one, and you inadvertedly drive people to alternatives -- or to give up *belief* altogether.
I am pretty sure that you understand very little of this -- how could you? But I write it out for my own benefit and also so that others can read and muse on it.
