Why the Scientific FSK is the Most Credible and Reliable

[Veritas Aequitas]

Why the Scientific FSK is the Most Credible and Reliable
viewtopic.php?f=12&t=39585

Which is an FSK. Is it more credible and reliable than science? That was my point.
And you granted my other point which was popularity does not mean that science is credible and reliable.

Yes it is an evaluating FSK to evaluate and compare the credibility, reliability and objectivity of FSKs in generating the emergence and realization of reality, facts, truth, knowledge and objectivity.

Let's say, examinations are established by examiners to evaluate [based on an evaluation FSK-A with criteria] the competence of a group of 50 competitors [say divers in an Olympic competition] [each with their own FSK] and marks upon 100 are given; say competitor with FSK-Y is given the highest rating at 99/100.
Surely it is irrelevant to ask whether FSK-A has higher diving competence than FSK-Y.

Similarly it is irrelevant to ask whether the evaluating FSK has a higher FSK than that of Science and other FSKs competing against Science.

The criteria used in the evaluating-FSK must be self-evident, for example,
the criteria of testability, reproducibility, repeatability is undeniable by any rational person.
If science claimed 'water is H20' in general [no considering isomers], anyone can do the test repeatedly to get the same result all the time.
As such, all the criteria must be self-evident, universal and not easily disputed.

In this case, it is irrelevant to ask whether the evaluating FSK is more credible and reliable than the scientific FSK and other FSK related to the establishment of reality of the universe.

[Veritas Aequitas]

When I made the claim re the OP, I often get queried why the Scientific facts, truths and knowledge are the most credible and reliable.

IN another thread you are claiming that mind independent reality is absurd.
Sadly you have not joined up the dots since you "FSK" nonsense is nothing if not utterly reliant on realism.

It is utterly painful seeing your brain grind into some sort of reason over the years.

As usual, you are very unintelligent, i.e. without a thinking rational brain.

Philosophical Realism claims reality and things are mind-independent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism

When I refer to FSK, it is implied a human-based FSK.
Human based mean grounded on human mind and body.
Grounded on human mind and body means not mind-independent.
Therefore a human-based FSK can NEVER be grounded [reliant] on mind-independent realism [philosophical].

Once I exploited your low IQ blabbering, once is enough.
You should just shut up from now on, the more you counter, the more you are exposing your low IQ.

[Sculptor]

When I made the claim re the OP, I often get queried why the Scientific facts, truths and knowledge are the most credible and reliable.

IN another thread you are claiming that mind independent reality is absurd.
Sadly you have not joined up the dots since you "FSK" nonsense is nothing if not utterly reliant on realism.

It is utterly painful seeing your brain grind into some sort of reason over the years.

As usual, you are very unintelligent, i.e. without a thinking rational brain.

Philosophical Realism claims reality and things are mind-independent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism

When I refer to FSK, it is implied a human-based FSK.
Human based mean grounded on human mind and body.
Grounded on human mind and body means not mind-independent.
Therefore a human-based FSK can NEVER be grounded [reliant] on mind-independent realism [philosophical].

Once I exploited your low IQ blabbering, once is enough.
You should just shut up from now on, the more you counter, the more you are exposing your low IQ.

Dimwit.
Your FSK is a plea for objective. Objectivity is nothing without realism.
This is not rocket science.

[Veritas Aequitas]

IN another thread you are claiming that mind independent reality is absurd.
Sadly you have not joined up the dots since you "FSK" nonsense is nothing if not utterly reliant on realism.

It is utterly painful seeing your brain grind into some sort of reason over the years.

As usual, you are very unintelligent, i.e. without a thinking rational brain.

Philosophical Realism claims reality and things are mind-independent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism

When I refer to FSK, it is implied a human-based FSK.
Human based mean grounded on human mind and body.
Grounded on human mind and body means not mind-independent.
Therefore a human-based FSK can NEVER be grounded [reliant] on mind-independent realism [philosophical].

Once I exploited your low IQ blabbering, once is enough.
You should just shut up from now on, the more you counter, the more you are exposing your low IQ.

Dimwit.
Your FSK is a plea for objective. Objectivity is nothing without realism.
This is not rocket science.

You are the real ignorant dimwit.
Philosophically your statement above is meaningless.

There are many types of realism.
There are also many types of anti-realism.

In another perspective,
a realist can be at the same time an anti-realist in a different sense, and vice-versa.

There are two senses of objectivity;
Two Senses of 'Objective'
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39326
i.e.

1. Philosophical Realism -Objectivity = illusory
2. FSK-ed Objectivity - realistic

In your case, your objectivity is grounded on Philosophical Realism.
1. Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?t=40167
as such, your objective based on philosophical realism is illusory.

In my case, my objectivity is conditioned upon a human-based FSK of which the scientific FSK [grounded on scientific anti-realism] is very realistic.
Scientific Objectivity
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=39286

Your sense of scientific objectivity grounded on scientific realism [philosophical realism] is illusory.

Counter the above line by line.
Don't put your tails between your legs, yelping, blabbering and run.