Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 2:04 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 1:41 pm
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 1:17 pm
You're getting carried away by incidentals mon ami. Can we take a few steps backwards, to the point before I said "I wish time travel were possible." In other words, let's discuss 1 = 0. I'm all ears.
DID 'you' or DID NOT 'you' READ the WORDS I WROTE, WHEN I SAID;
Before we MOVE ON, do you STILL want to CLAIM that there ACTUALLY EXISTS a so-called 'appropriate counter' to MY CLAIM?
IF, and WHEN, you ANSWER this QUESTION, appropriately, then I WILL TELL you HOW and WHY 1 does NOT equal 0.
If you DID NOT, then now you HAVE, hopefully.
But if you DID READ THOSE WORDS, previously, then WHY SAY and WRITE here;
let's discuss 1 = 0. I'm all ears
I FOREWARNED you, EARLIER, VERY CLEARLY, in very clearly written words, THAT
I WILL TELL you HOW and WHY 1 does NOT equal 0
IF, and WHEN you HAVE ALREADY ANSWERED the PRECEDING QUESTION, APPROPRIATELY.
Is it like I REALLY DO KNOW what IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN? Or, do these people REALLY NOT READ the WORDS that I ACTUALLY SAY and WRITE here?
Or, is there some 'thing' ELSE going on here?
First of all, I need to apologize to you. I'm not a good reader, so you might come to the wrong conclusions from my responses that'll, to you, seem bizarre.
you CAN 'apologize', or even PRETEND TO 'apologize', AS MUCH as you like and for AS LONG as you like. BUT, while in your so-called "apology" you are then going to MAKE ANOTHER CLAIM, then I suggest you are ABLE TO back up and support 'this ONE', 'this TIME.
Now, if you are going to MAKE the Truly ABSURD CLAIM that 'I' might have 'come to the wrong conclusions' BECAUSE 'you' are NOT a 'good reader', then what ACTUAL PROOF do you HAVE that 'I might have come to ANY wrong conclusion here, from your responses'?
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 2:04 pm
If you're actually keepin' track of the convo, you should be able to find something that'll clear things up for ya.
BUT, from MY PERSPECTIVE, I have NOT got LOST ANYWHERE. That is; ABSOLUTELY NOTHING is 'muddied' here, which would NEED 'clearing up', well to me anyway, and I have ALSO 'kept track' ALL of the way here.
Is there ANY 'thing' in what I have SAID and WRITTEN here to make you ASSUME or BELIEVE that I NOT 'actually been keeping track of 'the conversation' here'?
If yes, THEN INFORM 'us' ALL here now.
This is what I have OBSERVED, from MY PERSPECTIVE,
you MADE a CLAIM, which WAS INFERRED, and since you have NOT BACKED DOWN from THAT CLAIM NOR CLAIMED that 'that' was NOT IMPLIED, YOUR CLAIM STANDS.
I COUNTERED THAT CLAIM, APPROPRIATELY.
you THEN CLAIMED that there EXISTS an 'appropriate counter' to MY CLAIM. you, STILL, have NOT PROVIDED ANY PROOF for YOUR CLAIM, NOR have you ANSWERED WHETHER, you STILL want to CLAIM that there ACTUALLY EXISTS a so-called 'appropriate counter' to MY CLAIM?
We are STILL WAITING for YOUR ANSWER here.
you have also MADE OTHER CLAIMS, which I have ALSO QUESTIONED you ABOUT, and which we are STILL WAITING for you TO ANSWER.
IF you were ACTUALLY keeping track of THIS DISCUSSION, then you WOULD ALREADY KNOW what HAS HAPPENED and OCCURRED, ALSO.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sun May 07, 2023 2:04 pm
An intriguing remark there, as regards the 1 = 0 claim the OP made. We're on the same page thus. Gracias for being so persistent with me, I'm a poor thinker.
If you SAY SO.
But "others" are just NOTICING and SEEING ANOTHER ATTEMPT at 'trying' NOT TO ANSWER the QUESTION/S that have been posed, and ASKED, TO you, and thus NOTICING even FURTHER ATTEMPTS to just KEEP MAKING CLAIMS, but then 'TRYING TO' RUN AWAY and HIDE when QUESTIONED and/or CHALLENGED OVER 'those CLAIMS'.
BUT, this is ONLY what 'artificial intelligence', and/or one's WITHOUT ACTUAL PROOF, CAN DO.
For example, 'you' CLAIM, 'An intriguing remark there, as regards the 1 = 0 claim the opening post made'.
Besides that CLAIM and statement not making ANY real sense, I WILL now CHALLENGE 'you' to INFORM 'us' of 'what', EXACTLY, was THE 'intriguing remark there', and to INFORM 'us' of HOW, EXACTLY, 'that remark' was IN REGARDS to the 1 = 0 claim, IN the opening post.
Oh, and while 'you' are at 'it' here, ALSO INFORM 'us' of 'what', EXACTLY, IS THE CLAIM, IN the opening post, which 'you' are REFERRING TO here.
Now, ONCE AGAIN, we WILL WAIT, to SEE, if you do PROVIDE ANSWERS, and PROOF, or just 'TRY TO' RUN AWAY and HIDE AGAIN. Just like 'artificial intelligence' or one WITHOUT PROOF can ONLY, REALLY, DO.
So, AGAIN, we WAIT, to SEE.