How does Geometry help teach Grammar?
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2022 9:58 pm
Plato was, to my knowledge, the first person to recommend learning grammar and the principles of predication using geometry. Why?
The definition of a thing tells us that every thing is expressed as a binary construct, a relative constrained by correlatives. When we factor in Symbols and methods of using those symbols to effect binary recursion, we achieve four categories of grammar which we can use traditional names to call: Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.
Three of these are logical, while the fourth, geometry is analogical. Geometry is completely metaphorical. The relative difference, called a line, can represent any relative difference what so ever which makes it a perfect pairing partner to the preceding three logical systems of grammar.
Binary recursion can only produce a binary result, and one of those binary uses is embodied in the words, true and false. Thus, we pair two or more well defined systems of grammar to help guide us in using any particular one of them. Just writing equations to geometric figures teaches one all of the basics of naming in any system of the logical systems of grammar. Therefore, one can learn the principles of grammar by pairing two common programs, Geometer's Sketchpad and MathCad.
However due to the primitive state of geometry when I started my studies, I ended up producing geometry the likes of which has never been seen before and that work, and the different works I produced in geometry is in Universal Language pdf portfolios on the Internet Archive.
One learns first how to write equations to figures, then one learns a very robust form of geometry by which they can write any equation with.
So, one learns grammar by using two or more systems of grammar, pairing one with the other as demonstrated by Euclid. Thus, one learns how to name the parts of a figure and write the mathematics to express it, and then one learns to write equations as the geometric figure itself.
However, if you are as lame as many have demonstrated and cannot even agree with the first step in pairing logic with analogic, it is because no amount of study will keep you from being a babbling mystic.
Line upon line, precept upon precept, i.e., the original metaphor for using geometry to learn how to reason goes back to the Judeo-Christian Book, a book which repeatedly tells the reader that mankind will be to illiterate to read it until after a certain time in human history, so let us, for now, cite just Plato as metaphor is not in the range of most, especially how brilliantly it is used in the JCS.
The definition of a thing tells us that every thing is expressed as a binary construct, a relative constrained by correlatives. When we factor in Symbols and methods of using those symbols to effect binary recursion, we achieve four categories of grammar which we can use traditional names to call: Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.
Three of these are logical, while the fourth, geometry is analogical. Geometry is completely metaphorical. The relative difference, called a line, can represent any relative difference what so ever which makes it a perfect pairing partner to the preceding three logical systems of grammar.
Binary recursion can only produce a binary result, and one of those binary uses is embodied in the words, true and false. Thus, we pair two or more well defined systems of grammar to help guide us in using any particular one of them. Just writing equations to geometric figures teaches one all of the basics of naming in any system of the logical systems of grammar. Therefore, one can learn the principles of grammar by pairing two common programs, Geometer's Sketchpad and MathCad.
However due to the primitive state of geometry when I started my studies, I ended up producing geometry the likes of which has never been seen before and that work, and the different works I produced in geometry is in Universal Language pdf portfolios on the Internet Archive.
One learns first how to write equations to figures, then one learns a very robust form of geometry by which they can write any equation with.
So, one learns grammar by using two or more systems of grammar, pairing one with the other as demonstrated by Euclid. Thus, one learns how to name the parts of a figure and write the mathematics to express it, and then one learns to write equations as the geometric figure itself.
However, if you are as lame as many have demonstrated and cannot even agree with the first step in pairing logic with analogic, it is because no amount of study will keep you from being a babbling mystic.
Line upon line, precept upon precept, i.e., the original metaphor for using geometry to learn how to reason goes back to the Judeo-Christian Book, a book which repeatedly tells the reader that mankind will be to illiterate to read it until after a certain time in human history, so let us, for now, cite just Plato as metaphor is not in the range of most, especially how brilliantly it is used in the JCS.