Deleted 500
The Two Types of Enlightenment and Their Relationship
same
Last edited by Luxin on Thu Mar 18, 2021 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Deleted 500
This must be how eternal recurrence got started!
It never needed to recur since it never changed and therefore remained the same!
It never needed to recur since it never changed and therefore remained the same!
REPLY TO AGE
Sorry dear man, you're brilliant and spotted my inconsistency. I cannot answer your enquiries.
Forgive me please, and take care.
Luxin.
Forgive me please, and take care.
Luxin.
Re: Deleted 500
Eternal Recurrence is simply an idea we invented. In Nietzsche's version, it was used mostly as a challenge in how much do you love your life if you were informed that it will repeat forever.
Re: Deleted 500
Recurrence implies a beginning, so eternal recurrance implies a beginning but no ending, which explains the Christian belief that when born again one is born to eternal life.
Re: Deleted 500
How can something eternal have a beginning and since when, except in medieval times, has Christian belief ever made sense. It was never meant to be logical but only, on a purely psychic level, believable. Based on all the weird crap people believe in these days, it makes perfect sense that people from long ago believed as they did; their stories were far grander than what we have feeding us today. Their intelligence no less than ours, the only difference, they were far less confused in their understanding of a world divinely ruled, than the real one we have facing us today.
Re: Deleted 500
Anything that recurs, first must occur.
- The first occurance of something is the creation of that something, not the recurrance of that something.
- After the occurance happens the first time, then for reality to correlate with the concept of eternal, recurrence would continue on without end.
Re: Deleted 500
It makes sense to those who speak religion lingo, in the same way that dark matter, which has never had a relationship with any of the five senses, makes sense to those who speak STEM lingo.
The lingos of both religion and STEM function on a premise. For religion, a creator is based on the premise that creation must have a creator. For STEM, dark matter is based on the premise that the universe must fit the limitations of STEM explanations.
Re: Deleted 500
Yes! The way you put it does make sense. However, as thought experiments go it does contain a seeming paradox in the sense that if the universe were eternal it does not mandate the idea that any presumed type of eternal recurrence is possible or probable within it. That would require an operational universe, not one whose density and energy will become so low and tenuous, caused by the dilution of an expanding universe, where in the end, all that's left is the cold, empty space that's doomed to last forever.Walker wrote: βWed May 01, 2024 1:57 pmAnything that recurs, first must occur.
- The first occurance of something is the creation of that something, not the recurrance of that something.
- After the occurance happens the first time, then for reality to correlate with the concept of eternal, recurrence would continue on without end.
These are questions which have no relevance to life or philosophy, but as an abstraction, interesting to ponder nonetheless...at least, I think so.
Re: Deleted 500
But, the existing eternal Universe does not expand, and could not ever expand.Dubious wrote: βThu May 02, 2024 2:49 amYes! The way you put it does make sense. However, as thought experiments go it does contain a seeming paradox in the sense that if the universe were eternal it does not mandate the idea that any presumed type of eternal recurrence is possible or probable within it. That would require an operational universe, not one whose density and energy will become so low and tenuous, caused by the dilution of an expanding universe, where in the end, all that's left is the cold, empty space that's doomed to last forever.Walker wrote: βWed May 01, 2024 1:57 pmAnything that recurs, first must occur.
- The first occurance of something is the creation of that something, not the recurrance of that something.
- After the occurance happens the first time, then for reality to correlate with the concept of eternal, recurrence would continue on without end.
Re: Deleted 500
How do you know that?Age wrote: βThu May 02, 2024 3:53 amBut, the existing eternal Universe does not expand, and could not ever expand.Dubious wrote: βThu May 02, 2024 2:49 amYes! The way you put it does make sense. However, as thought experiments go it does contain a seeming paradox in the sense that if the universe were eternal it does not mandate the idea that any presumed type of eternal recurrence is possible or probable within it. That would require an operational universe, not one whose density and energy will become so low and tenuous, caused by the dilution of an expanding universe, where in the end, all that's left is the cold, empty space that's doomed to last forever.Walker wrote: βWed May 01, 2024 1:57 pm
Anything that recurs, first must occur.
- The first occurance of something is the creation of that something, not the recurrance of that something.
- After the occurance happens the first time, then for reality to correlate with the concept of eternal, recurrence would continue on without end.
Re: Deleted 500
Entropy is one side of the coin. The other side is the intelligence inherent within matter that becomes a self-perpetuating collector and organizer of energy, displayed in orderings of form that appear as stars, and life.Dubious wrote: βThu May 02, 2024 2:49 amYes! The way you put it does make sense. However, as thought experiments go it does contain a seeming paradox in the sense that if the universe were eternal it does not mandate the idea that any presumed type of eternal recurrence is possible or probable within it. That would require an operational universe, not one whose density and energy will become so low and tenuous, caused by the dilution of an expanding universe, where in the end, all that's left is the cold, empty space that's doomed to last forever.Walker wrote: βWed May 01, 2024 1:57 pmAnything that recurs, first must occur.
- The first occurance of something is the creation of that something, not the recurrance of that something.
- After the occurance happens the first time, then for reality to correlate with the concept of eternal, recurrence would continue on without end.
These are questions which have no relevance to life or philosophy, but as an abstraction, interesting to ponder nonetheless...at least, I think so.
From what I gather, the intelligence is what organizes the Higgs field.
Say it. G... G... G...