Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2017 11:23 pm
Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:19 pm
Walker wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2017 3:07 pm
French no-go zones are not populated by Europeans, or rather, any Europeans who may populate the zones are not the reason why the zones are no-go.
"What is new, is that no-go zones are no longer relegated to the suburbs, where migrants and Muslims have usually been concentrated.
"No-go zones, through mass migration, have been emerging in the heart of Paris, Bordeaux, Toulouse, Marseille, Grenoble, Avignon -- districts "privatized" here and there by a mix of drug traffickers, Salafist zealots and Islamic youth gangs. The main victims are women. They are -- both Muslim and non-Muslim -- sexually harassed; some are sexually assaulted."
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1040 ... o-go-zones
So, in summary, the imports create enclaves (so much for any semblance of integration) patiently waiting for their numbers to explode until the Europeans have to create these islands for themselves having retreated into a minority. Isn't the future going to be just lovely!
Gustav might say that there is no calculation involved other than opening the floodgates and letting nature take it’s course. The abiding question is why. Then again, he may not. What do you think?
I haven’t read much of Gustav mostly because his posts were too long. I have very little patience reading virtual essays whose ideas do not conform to their length however well-written they may be.
Anyways, he’s banned – though I can’t understand why but it’s not my call. I’m merely renting space and can be evicted for whatever reason any time which would be hardly traumatic since nothing of value would be erased.
Not having contributed to his posts, I’m not in a position to second guess him. In any event many of my views, right or wrong, are probably more extreme than his; I’ll keep those to myself.