Page 5 of 8

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 12:10 pm
by HexHammer
Greta wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:
HexHammer wrote:That would explain your skill of reasoning.
You idiot, what do you think someone like me does for a living? I teach philosophy and science.
It must be hard to squeeze that in between all the window cleaning ;)

I'm happy to have a Hex-free chat about Chalmers. HH's views about DC are well enough documented.
Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 12:42 pm
by Terrapin Station
HexHammer wrote:
Terrapin Station wrote:At any rate the reason I said this is simply that it's clear as day from comments you've made. You have no understanding of what the conventional definition of circularity is.
I think I've PLENTY of times proved that you have no deeper understanding of anything and I have superior understanding! You like most other people here can only do parrot speeches!
I don't doubt that you think that. If only that had some value beyond what it is.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 12:43 pm
by HexHammer
Terrapin Station wrote:I don't doubt that you think that. If only that had some value beyond what it is.
Needest I say you were dead wrong in "irreducible complexity" ..shall I go on?

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 1:02 pm
by Greta
HexHammer wrote:
Greta wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:
You idiot, what do you think someone like me does for a living? I teach philosophy and science.
It must be hard to squeeze that in between all the window cleaning ;)

I'm happy to have a Hex-free chat about Chalmers. HH's views about DC are well enough documented.
Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.
No, YOUR views are well enough documented. Sheesh.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 3:08 pm
by Terrapin Station
HexHammer wrote:
Terrapin Station wrote:I don't doubt that you think that. If only that had some value beyond what it is.
Needest I say you were dead wrong in "irreducible complexity" ..shall I go on?
As if I'd ever used that phrase or said anything about that. In that discussion, I simply asked you this: "You'd say there aren't elementary particles in the (current) standard model?"

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:58 pm
by HexHammer
Terrapin Station wrote:As if I'd ever used that phrase or said anything about that. In that discussion, I simply asked you this: "You'd say there aren't elementary particles in the (current) standard model?"
Liar!

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:00 pm
by HexHammer
Greta wrote:
HexHammer wrote:
Greta wrote: It must be hard to squeeze that in between all the window cleaning ;)

I'm happy to have a Hex-free chat about Chalmers. HH's views about DC are well enough documented.
Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.
No, YOUR views are well enough documented. Sheesh.
So you weren't sarcastic, hmmm thanks! :mrgreen:

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:46 pm
by Terrapin Station
HexHammer wrote:
Terrapin Station wrote:As if I'd ever used that phrase or said anything about that. In that discussion, I simply asked you this: "You'd say there aren't elementary particles in the (current) standard model?"
Liar!
Well, you're welcome to quote me otherwise.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 11:04 pm
by Greta
Should we declare this thread officially dead?

It seems we are not allowed to have a civilised chat about Chalmers.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 3:39 am
by Ginkgo
HexHammer wrote:So does many people, and can only make parrot speeches, not really think critically and abstract which those who earn more money typically can, as their reasoning skills typically are higher.
What a load of BS. Higher wages have nothing to do with intelligence. BTW your grammar is appalling.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 3:46 am
by Ginkgo
HexHammer wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:You asked a question and I provided the answer.
True enough but it was imo a poor answer.
You opinion in this thread has been nothing but nonsense and babble. I gave you the correct answer.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 3:51 am
by Ginkgo
HexHammer wrote:Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.
The "hard" and "easy'' problems of consciousness.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:49 pm
by HexHammer
Ginkgo wrote:
HexHammer wrote:So does many people, and can only make parrot speeches, not really think critically and abstract which those who earn more money typically can, as their reasoning skills typically are higher.
What a load of BS. Higher wages have nothing to do with intelligence. BTW your grammar is appalling.
And how do you know? You who haven't tried to sign a million dollar contract.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:50 pm
by HexHammer
Ginkgo wrote:
HexHammer wrote:
Ginkgo wrote:You asked a question and I provided the answer.
True enough but it was imo a poor answer.
You opinion in this thread has been nothing but nonsense and babble. I gave you the correct answer.
No, you don't have the mental aptitude to understand what the correct answer is.

Re: The Conscious Mind by David Chalmers

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:51 pm
by HexHammer
Ginkgo wrote:
HexHammer wrote:Awww, well please point out just 1 well documented thing that he says.
The "hard" and "easy'' problems of consciousness.
This explains exactly nothing, and only shows how easily manipulated you are.