I wouldn't call it virtue signaling. She does a lot of that, but that's when you do or say things that show you are attacking the bad people. You're taking a stand, you are siding with the oppressed.Walker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 30, 2022 5:07 pmThat's an interesting take that I didn't consider. No to that. I have a broader view of the world. Perhaps that's why folks just can't understand what I write.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sat Jul 30, 2022 12:27 pmLike his writing (or my reply) is like Elizabeth Warren?
It's in the sense that Warren used her fantasy pedigree as a form of virtue signaling. She got to check the “minority box,” and get that special consideration for being a minority. She liked being a feather in diversity's cap. Or as she likely would say, diversity's headdress.
She got to be the “diverse,” in a diverse faculty, and she made her (fantasy) roots known to get the vote from the oppressed tribes of Massachusetts, and from those white liberals who are not her blood brothers but are instead, filled with white guilt over treatment of the aboriginals.
It’s a type of virtue signaling. Victim signaling. It's a notch up from pandering by faking a Southern accent when campaigning for political office in the South, which is what panderers such as the one and only Obama, and that cupcake Clinton, would do. Come to think of it, cursing around cursers is also a form of pandering, like effecting a Southern accent ... but I digress.
This is deeper and it's not about action. It's claiming to be part of an oppressed group and also one considered cool. Even conservatives have sometimes claimed (falsely) Native blood for the cool side of that equation.
Virtue signaling is an astute concept and both sides do it but in different ways, generally.